This introduction to the virtual special issue surveys the development of spatial housing economics from its roots in neoclassical theory, through more recent developments in social interactions modelling, and touching on the role of institutions, path dependence and economic history. The survey also points to some of the more promising future directions for the subject that are beginning to appear in the literature. The survey covers elements of hedonic models, spatial econometrics, neighbourhood models, housing market areas, housing supply, models of segregation, migration, housing tenure, subnational house price modelling including the so-called ripple effect, and agent-based models. Possible future directions are set in the context of a selection of recent papers that have appeared in Urban Studies. Nevertheless, there are still important gaps in the literature that merit further attention, arising at least partly from emerging policy problems. These include more research on housing and biodiversity, the relationship between housing and civil unrest, the effects of changing age distributions – notably housing for the elderly – and the impact of different international institutional structures. Methodologically, developments in Big Data provide an exciting framework for future work.
AccetturoAManaresiFMocettiS. (2014) Don’t stand so close to me: The urban impact of immigration. Regional Science and Urban Economics45: 45–56.
2.
AlonsoW (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BalcilarMBeyeneAGuptaR. (2013) ‘Ripple’ effects in South African house prices. Urban Studies50(5): 876–894.
4.
BallMMeenGNygaardC (2010) Housing supply revisited: Evidence from international, national, and company data. Journal of Housing Economics19: 255–268.
5.
BarrosCPGil-AlanaLAPayneJE (2012) Comovements among U.S. state housing prices: Evidence from fractional cointegration. Economic Modelling29(3): 936–942.
6.
BattyM (2005) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
BellDRutherfordA (2012) Long-term care and the housing market. Scottish Journal of Political Economy59(5): 543–563.
8.
BergL (2002) Prices on the second-hand market for Swedish family houses: Correlation, causation and determinants. International Journal of Housing Policy2(1): 1–24.
9.
BöheimRTaylorM (2002) Tied down or time to move? Investigating the relationships between housing tenure, employment status and residential mobility in Britain. Scottish Journal of Political Economy49(4): 369–392.
10.
BoskerMBrakmanSGarretsenH. (2007) Looking for multiple equilibria when geography matters: German city growth and the WWII shock. Journal of Urban Economics61: 152–169.
11.
BoverOMuellbauerJMurphyA (1989) Housing, wages and UK labour markets. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics51(2): 97–136.
12.
BramleyG (1993a) Land use planning and the housing market in Britain: The impact on housebuilding and house prices. Environment and Planning A25(7): 1021–1051.
13.
BramleyG (1993b) The impact of land use planning and tax subsidies on the supply and price of housing in Britain. Urban Studies30(1): 5–30.
14.
BramleyG (1998) Measuring planning: Indicators of planning restraint and its impact on the housing market. Environment and Planning B25: 31–57.
15.
BramleyG (1999) Housing market adjustment and land-supply constraints. Environment and Planning A21: 1169–1188.
16.
BramleyG (2002) Planning regulation and housing supply in a market system. In: O’SullivanAGibbK (eds) Housing Economics and Public Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 193–217.
17.
BramleyGLeishmanC (2005) Planning and housing supply in two-speed Britain: Modelling local market outcomes. Urban Studies42(12): 2213–2244.
18.
BruecknerJK (1980) Residential succession and land-use dynamics in a vintage model of urban housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics10: 225–240.
19.
BruecknerJK (2000) Urban growth models with durable housing: An overview. In: HuriotJ-MThisseJ-F (eds) Economics of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–289.
20.
BruecknerJKThisseJ-FZenouY (1999) Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review43: 91–107.
21.
CameronGMuellbauerJ (1998) The housing market and regional commuting and migration choices. Scottish Journal of Political Economy45: 420–446.
22.
CameronGMuellbauerJ (2001) Earnings, unemployment, and housing in Britain. Journal of Applied Econometrics16: 203–220.
23.
CanA (1992) Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics22(3): 453–474.
24.
CanAMegbolugbeI (1997) Spatial dependence and house price index construction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics14(1,2): 203–222.
25.
CardDMasARothsteinJ (2008) Tipping and the dynamics of segregation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics123(1): 177–218.
26.
ChanS (2001) Spatial lock-in: Do falling house prices constrain residential mobility?Journal of Urban Economics49: 567–586.
27.
ChenP-FChienM-SLeeC-C (2011) Dynamic modeling of regional house price diffusion in Taiwan. Journal of Housing Economics20(4): 315–332.
28.
ChenYFingletonBPryceG. (2013) Implications of rising flood-risk for employment location: A GMM spatial model with agglomeration and endogenous house price effects. Journal of Property Research30(4): 298–323.
29.
CheshirePSheppardS (1995) On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica62(246): 247–267.
30.
CheshirePSheppardS (1998) Estimating the demand for housing, land and neighbourhood characteristics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics60(3): 357–382.
31.
CheshirePSheppardS (2004) Capitalising the value of free schools: The impact of supply characteristics and uncertainty. Economic Journal114(499): 397–424.
32.
CheshirePSheppardS (2005) The introduction of price signals into land use planning decision-making: A proposal. Urban Studies42(4): 647–663.
33.
ClarkC (1951) Urban population densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General)114(4): 490–496.
34.
ClarkWAVMorrisonPS (2012) Socio-spatial mobility and residential sorting: Evidence from a large-scale survey. Urban Studies49(15): 3253–3270.
35.
ConstantAFRobertsRZimmermannKF (2009) Ethnic identity and immigrant homeownership. Urban Studies46(9): 1879–1898.
36.
CookS (2003) The convergence of regional house prices in the UK. Urban Studies40(11): 2285–2294.
37.
CookS (2006) A disaggregated analysis of asymmetrical behaviour in the UK housing market. Urban Studies43(11): 2067–2074.
38.
CookS (2012) β-convergence and the cyclical dynamics of UK regional house prices. Urban Studies49(1): 203–218.
39.
CookSHollyS (2000) Statistical properties of UK house prices: An analysis of disaggregated vintages. Urban Studies. 37(11): 2045–2055.
40.
CookSWatsonD (2015) A new perspective on the ripple effect in the UK housing market: Comovement, cyclical subsamples and alternative indices. Urban Studies. DOI:10.1177/0042098015610482.
41.
CoulsonNE (1999) Housing inventory and completion. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics18(1): 89–105.
42.
CunninghamCR (2006) House price uncertainty, timing of development, and vacant land prices: Evidence for real options in Seattle. Journal of Urban Economics59: 1–31.
43.
DavidPA (2007) Path dependence – A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica – The Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History1(2): 91–114.
44.
DavisDRWeinsteinDE (2002) Bones, bombs, and break points: The geography of economic activity. American Economic Review92(5): 1269–1289.
45.
DurlaufSN (2006) Groups, social influences, and inequality. In: BowlesSDurlaufSHoffK (eds) Poverty Traps. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 141–175.
46.
EvansAW (1973) The Economics of Residential Location. London: Macmillan.
47.
FingletonB (2008) Housing supply, housing demand, and affordability. 45(8): 1545–1563.
48.
GalsterGAnderssonRMusterdS (2010) Who is affected by neighbourhood income mix? Gender, age, family, employment and income differences. Urban Studies47(14): 2915–2944.
GeanakoplosJAxtellRFarmerDJ. (2012) Getting at systemic risk via an agent-based model of the housing market. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings102(3): 53–58.
51.
GibbonsS (2004) The costs of urban property crime. Economic Journal114(498): F441–F463.
52.
GlaeserELGyourkoJ (2005) Urban decline and durable housing. Journal of Political Economy113(2): 345–375.
53.
GlaeserELGyourkoJSaizA (2008) Housing supply and housing bubbles. Journal of Urban Economics64: 198–217.
54.
GonzalezLOrtegaF (2013) Immigration and housing booms: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Regional Science53(1): 37–59.
55.
GoodmanACThibodeauTG (2008) Where are the speculative bubbles in US housing markets?Journal of Housing Economics17: 117–137.
56.
GordonI (2014) Fitting a quart into a pint pot? Development, displacement and/or densification in the London region. In: KochanB (ed.) Migration and London’s Growth. London: London School of Economics, pp. 41–56.
57.
GreenRKMalpezziSMayoSK (2005) Metropolitan-specific estimates of the price elasticity of housing, and their sources. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings95(2): 334–339.
58.
GuptaRMillerSM (2010) Ripple effects and forecasting home prices in Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Phoenix. The Annals of Regional Science48(3): 763–782.
59.
GuptaRMillerSM (2012) The time-series properties of house prices: A case study of the southern California market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics44(3): 339–361.
60.
GyourkoJSaizA (2004) Reinvestment in the housing stock: The role of construction costs and the supply side. Journal of Urban Economics55: 238–256.
61.
GyourkoJSaizASummersA (2008) A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets. Urban Studies45(3): 693–729.
62.
HaanM (2005) The decline of the immigrant home-ownership advantage: Life-cycle, declining fortunes and changing housing careers in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver 1981–2001. Urban Studies42(12): 2191–2212.
63.
HattonTJTaniM (2005) Immigration and inter regional mobility in the UK: 1982–2000. Economic Journal115(507): 342–358.
64.
HazamSFelsensteinD (2007) Terror, fear and behaviour in the Jerusalem housing market. Urban Studies44(13): 2529–2546.
65.
HedmanLGalsterG (2013) Neighbourhood income sorting and the effects of neighbourhood income mix on income: A holistic empirical exploration. Urban Studies50(1): 107–127.
66.
HelmDHepburnC (2012) The economic analysis of biodiversity: An assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy28(1): 1–21.
67.
HilberCVermeulenW (2016) The impact of supply constraints on house prices in England. Economic Journal126(591): 358–405.
68.
HenleyA (1998) Residential mobility, housing equity and the labour market. Economic Journal108(447): 414–427.
69.
HolmesMOteroJPanagiotidisT (2011) Investigating regional house price convergence in the United States: Evidence from a pair-wise approach. Economic Modelling28(6): 2369–2376.
70.
HughesGAMcCormickB (1981) Do council house policies reduce migration between regions?Economic Journal91(364): 919–939.
71.
HughesGAMcCormickB (1985) Migration intentions in the UK. Which households want to migrate and which succeed?Economic Journal95(Supplement): 113–123.
72.
HughesGAMcCormickB (1987) Housing markets, unemployment and labour market flexibility in the UK. European Economic Review31(3): 615–645.
73.
HughesGAMcCormickB (1990) Housing and labour market mobility. In: ErmischJ (ed.) Housing and the National Economy. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 94–108.
74.
IbraimovicTMasieroL (2014) Do birds of a feather flock together? The impact of ethnic segregation preferences on neighbourhood choice. Urban Studies51(4): 693–711.
75.
JonesCLeishmanCWatkinsC (2004) Intra-urban migration and housing submarkets: Theory and evidence. Housing Studies19(2): 269–283.
76.
JorgensonARiceJClarkB (2012) Assessing the temporal and regional differences in the relationships between infant and child mortality and urban slum prevalence in less developed countries, 1990–2005. Urban Studies49(16): 3495–3512.
77.
LeanHHSmythR (2013) Regional house prices and the ripple effect in Malaysia. Urban Studies50(5): 895–922.
78.
LeishmanC (2009) Spatial change and the structure of urban housing sub-markets. Housing Studies24(5): 563–585.
79.
LuckGW (2007) A review of the relationship between human population density and biodiversity. Biological Reviews82: 607–645.
80.
LuoZQLiuCPickenD (2007) Housing price diffusion pattern of Australia’s state capital cities. International Journal of Strategic Property Management11(4): 227–242.
81.
MaclennanDTuY (1996) Economic perspectives on the structure of local housing markets. Housing Studies11: 387–406.
82.
MalpezziSMaclennanD (2001) The long-run price elasticity of supply of new residential construction in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Housing Economics10: 278–306.
83.
MalpezziSMayoSK (1997) Getting housing incentives right: A case study of the effects of regulation, taxes and subsidies on housing supply in Malaysia. Land Economics73: 372–391.
84.
MayerCJSomervilleCT (2000) Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics30: 639–662.
85.
MayoSSheppardS (2001) Housing supply and the effects of stochastic development control. Journal of Housing Economics10: 109–128.
86.
MeenDMeenG (2003) Social behaviour as a basis for modelling the urban housing market: A review. Urban Studies40: 917–935.
87.
MeenG (1999) Regional house prices and the ripple effect: A new interpretation. Housing Studies14(6): 733–753.
88.
MeenGNygaardC (2011) Local housing supply and the impact of history and geography. Urban Studies48(14): 3107–3124.
89.
MillsES (1972) Urban Economics. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
90.
MuthRF (1969) Cities and Housing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
91.
NitschV (2003) Does history matter for urban primacy? The case of Vienna. Regional Science and Urban Economics33: 401–418.
92.
NorthDC (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93.
NygaardC (2011) International migration, housing demand and access to homeownership in the UK. Urban Studies48(11): 2211–2229.
94.
OngRWoodGColic-PeiskerV (2015) Housing older Australians: Loss of homeownership and pathways into housing assistance. Urban Studies52(16): 2979–3000.
95.
PainterGYuZ (2014) Caught in the housing bubble: Immigrants’ housing outcomes in traditional gateways and newly emerging destinations. Urban Studies51(4): 781–809.
96.
PortugaliJ (2000) Self-Organisation and the City. Berlin: Springer.
97.
PryceG (1999) Construction elasticities and land availability: A two-stage least-squares model of housing supply using the variable elasticity approach. Urban Studies36(13): 2283–2304.
98.
PryceGChenYGalsterG (2011) The impact of floods on house prices: An imperfect information approach with myopia and amnesia. Housing Studies26(2): 259–279.
99.
RavensteinEG (1885) The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London48(2): 167–235.
100.
RicardoD (1821) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 3rd Edition.London: John Murray.
101.
RosenthalSSHelsleyRW (1994) Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient. Journal of Urban Economics35: 182–200.
102.
SáF (2015) Immigration and house prices in the UK. Economic Journal125(587): 1393–1424.
103.
SaizA (2007) Immigration and housing rents in American cities. Journal of Urban Economics61: 345–371.
104.
SaizAWachterS (2011) Immigration and the neighborhood. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy3(2): 169–188.
105.
Sanso-NavarroMSanzFVera-CabelloM (2015) The impact of the American Civil War on city growth. Urban Studies52(16): 3070–3085.
106.
SchellingT (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology1: 143–186.
107.
ShiS (2009) The ripple effect of local house price movements in New Zealand. Journal of Property Research26(1): 1–24.
108.
SinningM (2010) Homeownership and economic performance of immigrants in Germany. Urban Studies47(2): 387–410.
109.
StevensonS (2004) House price diffusion and inter-regional and cross-border house price dynamics. Journal of Property Research21(4): 301–320.
110.
StorperM (2010) Why does a city grow? Specialisation, human capital or institutions. Urban Studies47(10): 2027–2050.
111.
TopelRRosenS (1988) Housing investment in the United States. Journal of Political Economy96(4): 718–740.
112.
TsoukisCWestawayP (1994) A forward looking model of housing consumption in the UK. Economic Modelling11(2): 266–279.
113.
Von ThünenJH (1826) Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtscaft and Nationalökonomie. Hamburg. Perthes. Translated version: HallP (ed.) Von Thünen’s Isolate State. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
114.
WheatonWC (1982) Urban residential growth under perfect foresight. Journal of Urban Economics12: 1–21.
115.
WingoL (1961) Transportation and Urban Land. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
116.
YinL (2009) The dynamics of residential segregation in Buffalo: An agent-based simulation. Urban Studies46(13): 2749–2770.
117.
YorkAMSmithMEStanleyBW. (2011) Ethnic and class clustering through the ages: A transdisciplinary approach to urban neighbourhood social patterns. Urban Studies48(11): 2399–2415.
118.
YoungHP (1998) Individual Strategy and Social Structure. An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
119.
YoungHP (2001) The dynamics of conformity. In: DurlaufSYoungHP (eds) Social Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 133–154.
120.
ZhangJ (2004a) Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation54: 533–550.
121.
ZhangJ (2004b) A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology28: 147–170.
122.
ZorluALattenJ (2009) Ethnic sorting in the Netherlands. Urban Studies46(9): 1899–1923.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
