Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Chinese

Business improvement districts represent a privatising urban governance instrument that visibly transforms urban landscapes. In the United States, the racialised impacts of business improvement districts require examination. Through a discussion of Washington, DC, a city profoundly injured by racist planning histories, we illustrate how business improvement districts, as part of a broader entrepreneurial regime, have driven gentrification citywide since the late 1990s. Focusing on the intersection of redevelopment and ‘creative placemaking’, we make visible the contradictions embedded in this business improvement district urbanism, which has harnessed the work of a network of actors to revalorise urban space while erasing working class places and in DC, its Black cultural, political and economic space.

Keywords

business improvement districts gentrification placemaking private urban governance redevelopment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANC (1974) Advisory Neighborhood Councils Hearing, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session on H.R. 12109, 146, Testimony of Marie Nahikian.

Anderson

Sternberg

(2013) ‘Non-white’ gentrification in Chicago’s Bronzeville and Pilsen: Racial economy and the intraurban contingency of urban redevelopment. Urban Affairs Review 49(3): 435–467.

Alpert

(2015) A NoMa cooperative hopes to redevelop mixed-income housing more successfully than DC’s past attempts. Greater Greater Washington, 19 August. Available at: https://ggwash.org/view/39073/a-noma-cooperative-hopes-to-redevelop-mixed-income-housing-more-successfully-than-dcs-past-attempts (accessed 19 April 2023).

Asch

Musgrove

(2017) Chocolate City: A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation’s Capital. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Banister

(2021) Toll Brothers unveils new name, details for 1,100-Unit DC project ahead of 2022 delivery. Bisnow, 28 September. Available at: https://www.bisnow.com/washington-dc/news/multifamily/toll-brothers-unveils-new-name-details-for-1100-unit-dc-project-110343#:∼:text=The%20under%2Dconstruction%20redevelopment%20of,details%20on%20its%20first%20phase (accessed 19 April 2023).

Boivie

(2017) Lessons from the Waterfront: Economic Development Projects Must do More to Lessen DC’s Worsening Income Inequality. Report, DC Fiscal Policy Institute, Washington, DC.

Bonds

(2013) The place of race in economic geography: Racing economic geography. Geography Compass 7(6): 398–411.

Briffault

(1999) A government for our time? Business improvement districts and urban governance. Columbia Law Review 99(2): 365–477.

Brown

Glasgow

(2011) Z.C. Case no. 11-03- southwest waterfront redevelopment proposed PUD order and response to post-hearing submissions. Report, Washington DC Office of Zoning.

10.

Capitol Riverfront BID (2022) Capitol riverfront’s northern gateways underpass + Virginia Ave corridor vision plan. Available at: https://ctycms.com/dc-capitol-riverfront/docs/underpass-vision-plan.pdf (accessed 8 October 2022).

11.

Carriere

Schalliol

(2021) The City Creative: The Rise of Urban Placemaking in Contemporary America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

12.

Carroll

(1998) The meaning of funk. The Washington Post, 1 February. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/library/dc/chocolate/funk.htm (accessed 19 April 2023).

13.

Cazenave

(2011) The Urban Racial State: Managing Race Relations in American Cities. Lanham, MD and Plymouth: Roman and Littlefield.

14.

Cherkasky

Shoenfeld

(n.d.) Mapping segregation. Prologue DC. Available at: http://mappingsegregationdc.org (accessed 3 November 2022).

15.

Chung

(2014) Why NoMa, not your neighborhood, got $50 million for parks. West North Blog. Available at: https://westnorth.com/2014/05/22/why-NoMa-not-your-neighborhood-got-50-million-for-parks/ (accessed 8 October 2022).

16.

Cirruzzo

(2019) In Emails to city, NoMa residents call for underpass encampments to be cleared. City Paper, 24 October. Available at: https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/177919/in-emails-to-city-noma-residents-call-for-underpass-encampments-to-be-cleared/ (accessed 19 April 2023).

17.

Community DC (2018) NoMa BID. Podcast. I Heart Radio. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.nomabid.org/iheartradio-interview-with-NoMa-bid-NoMa-parks-foundation-president-robin-eve-jasper/ (accessed 3 March 2022).

18.

Council of the District of Columbia (n.d.) Code of the district of Columbia. Available at: https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/titles/2/chapters/12/subchapters/VIII/parts/A (accessed 11 March 2023).

19.

DC BID Council (2017) BID profiles. Report, DC BID Council. Available at: https://www.dcbidcouncil.org/resources (accessed 5 September 2022).

20.

DC.gov (n.d.) Public Law 105-33. Available at: https://dcrb.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dcrb/publication/attachments/National%20Capital%20Revitalization%20and%20Self-Government%20Improvement%20Act%20of%201997%20%28Pub%20L%20105-33%29.pdf (accessed 11 March 2023).

21.

Davidson

(2009) Displacement, space and dwelling: Placing gentrification debate. Ethics Place Environment 12(2): 219–234.

22.

DowntownDC BID (2023) DowntownDC Black lives matter outdoor exhibit at Gallery Place. Available at: https://www.downtowndc.org/news/downtowndc-blacklivesmatter-outdoor-exhibit-at-gallery-place/ (accessed 10 March 2023).

23.

Eisen

(1960) Renewal plan for northeast gets go-ahead: Federal agency approves loan grant for $8.5 million. Washington Post, 21 February. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/docview/141284348/2720C4A2E9894F98PQ/1?accountid=8285 (accessed 19 April 2023).

24.

Fainstein

(2005) Cities and diversity: Should we want it? Can we plan for it? Urban Affairs Review 41(1): 3–19.

25.

Florida

(2003) Cities and the creative class. City Community 2(1): 3–19.

26.

Freund

DMP

(2007) Colored property: State Policy And White Racial Politics In Suburban America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

27.

Fullilove

(2005) Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It. New York, NY: One World/Ballantine Books.

28.

Fullilove

Wallace

(2011) Serial forced displacement in American cities, 1916–2010. Journal of Urban Health 88(3): 381–389.

29.

Gillette

(1995) Between Justice and Beauty: Race, Planning, and the Failure of Urban Policy in Washington, DC. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

30.

Golash-Boza

(2021) Census tract 72, Navy Yard, Washington, DC. Available at: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/b6843312f4c145efbef65a8942fb987b (accessed 8 October 2022).

31.

GSA (2014) Grant agreement with NoMA parks foundation. Report by General Service Administration. Available at: https://www.nomaparks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/50M-NOMA-Grant-Agreement-Council-Approved1.pdf (accessed 8 October 2022).

32.

Harris

(1993) Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review 106(8): 1710–1791.

33.

Harvey

(2008) The right to the city. New Left Review 53: 23–40.

34.

Harshbarger

Perry

(2019) The rise of Black-majority cities. Report, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA, February.

35.

Hochleutner

(2003) BIDs fare well: The democratic accountability of business improvement districts. New York University Law Review 78(1): 374–401.

36.

Hoerl

(2012) Selective amnesia and racial transcendence in news coverage of president Obama’s inauguration. Quarterly Journal of Speech 98(2): 178–202.

37.

Hopkinson

(2012a) Farewell to chocolate city. The Washington Post, 23 June. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/opinion/sunday/farewell-to-chocolate-city.html (accessed April 19 2023).

38.

Hopkinson

(2012b) Go-Go Live: The Musical Life and Death of a Chocolate City. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

39.

Howe

(2024) The city and the city: Tent camps and luxury development in the NoMa business improvement district (bid) in Washington, DC. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 28: 165–181.

40.

Hoyt

(2005) Planning through compulsory commercial clubs: Business improvement districts. Economic Affairs 24(4): 24–27.

41.

Huron

(2018) Carving Out the Commons: Tenant Organizing and Housing Cooperatives in Washington, DC. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

42.

Hyra

(2017) Race, Class, and Politics in the Cappuccino City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

43.

Institute on Metropolitan Opportunity (2019) American Neighborhood Change in the 21st Century. Report, University of Minnesota Law School, US, April.

44.

Isenberg

(2004) Downtown America: A History of the Place and the People Who Made It. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

45.

Jasper

(2019) An open letter from the NoMa BID about underpass encampments. The NoMa BID, Washington D.C, 21 August. Available at: https://www.nomabid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/An-Open-Letter-From-the-NoMa-BID-About-Underpass-Encampments-2019.pdf (accessed 3 October 2022)

46.

Knight

(1982) Ways and means to make city core an exciting place. Washington Post, 26 July. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1982/07/26/ways-and-means-to-make-city-core-an-exciting-place/1c098ebf-5c13-452e-b06a-cc34e1334712/ (accessed 19 April 2023).

47.

Kudla

(2021) Business improvement areas and the socio-cultural power of lobbying: Imposing market interests to affordable housing development. Environment and Planning: Economy and Space 53(8): 1974–1992.

48.

Levy

(2010) Business improvements in Philadelphia: A practitioner’s perspective. Drexel Law Review 3(1): 71–87.

49.

Lippert

(2012) ‘Clean and safe’ passage: Business improvement districts, urban security modes, and knowledge brokers. European Urban and Regional Studies 19(2): 167–180.

50.

Lipsitz

(1995) The possessive investment in whiteness: Racialized social democracy and the ‘white’ problem in American studies. American Quarterly 47(3): 369–387.

51.

McCann

Ward

(2014) Exploring urban policy mobilities: The case of business improvement districts. Sociologica 8(1): 1–20.

52.

McFarlane

(2003) Preserving community in the city: Special improvement districts and the privatization of urban racialized space. Stanford Agora Online Journal Legal Perspective 4: 1–36.

53.

McFarlane

(2009) Operatively white? Exploring the significance of race and class through the paradox of black middle-classness. Law Contemporary Problems 72(4): 163–196.

54.

McGovern

(1998) The Politics of Downtown Development: Dynamic Political Cultures in San Francisco and Washington, DC. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

55.

McKenzie

(2011) Beyond Privatopia: Rethinking Residential Private Government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

56.

MacKinnon

(2020) Activated alleyways: Mobilising clean and safe dwelling in Business Improvement Areas. In Andres

Zhang

(eds) Transforming Cities Through Temporary Urbanism. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.155–169.

57.

Markusen

Gadwa

(2010) Creative placemaking (The Mayors’ Institute on city design). National Endowment of the Arts. Available at: https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/CreativePlacemaking-Paper.pdf (accessed 19 April 2023).

58.

Maharawal

(2017) Black lives matter, gentrification and the security state in the San Francisco Bay Area. Anthropological Theory 17(3): 338–364.

59.

Malone

(2019) (Im)mobile and (un)successful? A policy mobilities approach to New Orleans’s residential security taxing districts. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(1): 102–118.

60.

Manning

(1998) Multicultural Washington, DC: The changing social and economic landscape of a post-industrial metropolis. Ethnic and Racial Studies 21(2): 328–355.

61.

Manzi

Smith-Bowers

(2005) Gated communities as club goods: Segregation or social cohesion? Housing Studies 20(2): 345–359.

62.

Marshall

(2021) State of the DC multifamily rental market. Saving DC’s rental housing market strike force. 19 February. Available at: https://dhcd.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dhcd/page_content/attachments/DC%27s%20Rental%20Housing%20Market%20Strikeforce%2020210219.pptx.pdf (accessed 19 April 2023).

63.

Michel

Stein

(2015) Reclaiming the European city and lobbying for privilege: Business improvement districts in Germany. Urban Affairs Review 51(1): 74–98.

64.

Monteilh

Weiss

(1998) The economic resurgence of Washington, DC: Citizen’s plan for prosperity in the 21st century. District of Columbia Department of Housing and Community Development. Available at: http://www.globalurban.org/The_Economic_Resurgence_of_Washington,_DC.pdf (accessed 28 September 2022).

65.

Morçöl

Hoyt

Meek

, et al. (eds) (2008) Business Improvement Districts: Research, Theories, and Controversies. Boca Raton and London: CRC Press.

66.

Morçöl

Karagoz

(2020) Accountability of business improvement district in urban governance networks: An investigation of state enabling laws. Urban Affairs Review 56(3): 888–918.

67.

MWCOG (2022) 2022 Homeless enumeration for the Washington Metropolitan Area. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. Washington, DC: The Homeless Services Planning and Coordinating Committee.

68.

National Performance Review (1995) Managing results: Initiatives in select American Cities. National Performance Review. Available at: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/fedstat/24e6.html (accessed 5 September 2022).

69.

Meriwether

(1897) Washington city government. Political Science Quarterly 12(3): 407–419.

70.

Miraftab

(2007) Governing post-Apartheid spatiality: Implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town. Antipode 39(4): 602–626.

71.

Modan

(2008) Mango fufu kimchi yucca: The depoliticization of ‘diversity’ in Washington, DC discourse. City & Society 20(2): 188–221.

72.

NoMa BID (2012) Public realm design plan. Report, NoMA BID. Available at: https://www.nomabid.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/NoMa-2012-Public-Realm-Design-Plan.pdf (accessed 5 July 2021).

73.

NoMa BID (2018a) NoMa BID renewal: Fiscal years 2018–2022. Available at: https://dslbd.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dslbd/NoMa%20BID%20Renewal%202017%20Five_Year%20Business%20Plan_011817.pdf (accessed 5 July 2021).

74.

NoMa BID (2018b) Press release: NoMa parks foundation opens ‘Rain’ installation in M Street NE underpass. Available at: https://nomabid.org/noma-parks-foundation-opens-rain-installation-in-m-street-ne-underpass/ (accessed 8 October 2022).

75.

O’Cleireacain

(1997) The Orphaned Capital: Adopting the Right Revenues for the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

76.

Office of Planning (2005) New communities citywide initiative/Northwest one. Report, Office of Planning of DC. Available at: https://planning.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/op/publication/attachments/NorthwestOneFinal.pdf (accessed 28 August 2021).

77.

Office of Planning (2010) The creative capital: The creative DC action agenda. Available at: https://planning.dc.gov/page/creative-dc-action-agenda (accessed 31 October 2022).

78.

Office of Policy Development and Research (2020) FY 2020 HUD income limits. Report, HUD, 14 April. Available at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/elist/2020-April-14.html (accessed 5 October 2022).

79.

Paris

(1998) African-American women’s activism and ghetto formation in a Washington DC neighborhood. PhD dissertation, American University, Washington DC, USA.

80.

Page

(2019) Angelique Brunner, 97 spurs development and revitalization in DC. Princeton Alumni Weekly, 31 July. Available at: https://paw.princeton.edu/article/angelique-brunner-97-spurs-development-and-revitalization-dc (accessed 5 July 2021)

81.

Pipkin

(2013) Public-private parks deal a first of its kind for DC. Elevation DC, 12 March. Available at: https://www.elevationdcmedia.com/features/YardsParkPartnership_031213.aspx (accessed 19 April 2023).

82.

Pritchett

(2003) The ‘public menace’ of blight: Urban renewal and the private uses of eminent domain. Paper 1199, Cornell University Faculty Scholarship.

83.

Rankin

Delaney

(2011) Community BIAs as practices of assemblage: Contingent politics in the neoliberal city. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 43(6): 1363–1380.

84.

RCLCO (2018) Riverfront recaptured: How public vision and investment catalyzed long term value in the capitol riverfront. Report, Capitol Riverfront BID, USA.

85.

Reed

(1999) Stirrings in the Jug: Black Politics in the Post-Segregation Era. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

86.

Richardson

Mitchell

Franco

(2019) Shifting neighborhoods: Gentrification and cultural displacement in American cities. National Community Reinvestment Coalition, 19 March. Available at: https://ncrc.org/gentrification/ (accessed 5 October 2022).

87.

Robinson

(2000) Black Marxism: The Making of The Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

88.

Rodd

(2017) The uncertain future of low-income housing in the heart of DC. Medium, 15 March. Available at: https://medium.com/@ScottCRodd/the-uncertain-future-of-low-income-housing-in-the-heart-of-d-c-8a1b668fa0d2 (accessed 19 April 2023).

89.

Russello

(2009) Commemoration amid criticism: The mixed legacy of urban renewal in southwest Washington, DC. Journal of Planning History 8(3): 175–220.

90.

Schaller

(2019) Business Improvement Districts and the Contradictions of Placemaking: BID Urbanism in Washington, D. C. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

91.

Schaller

Guinand

(2018) Pop-up landscapes: A new trigger to push up land value? Urban Geography 39(1): 54–74.

92.

Schupbach

(2015) Creative placemaking. Economic Development Journal 14(4): 28–33.

93.

Sedgwick

(1988) Privilege of unknowing. Genders 1: 102–124.

94.

Smith

(1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.

95.

Smith

(2006) The birth of DC’s neighborhood commissions: Remarks at a conference in 2006. Sam Smith’s Essays. Available at: https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2016/09/21/the-birth-of-dcs-neighborhood-commissions/ (accessed 19 April 2023).

96.

Stevens

(2016) The impact of business improvement districts in DC. Panel presentation, Tuesdays at APA, American Planning Association), Washington, DC, June 7. (Author Transcription).

97.

Summers

(2015) H Street, main street, and the neoliberal aesthetics of cool. In Hyra

Prince

(eds) Capital Dilemma: Growth and Inequality in Washington, DC. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.299–314.

98.

Summers

(2019) Black in Place: The Spatial Aesthetics of Race in a Post-Chocolate City. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

99.

SWBID (n.d.) Resources. Available at: https://www.swbid.org/resources (accessed 24 October 2022).

100.

US Census (2010–2019) Decennial census and American community survey, 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 (poverty by race in navy yard 2010-2019). Www.Policymap.Com. Available at: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51172175374_447a90cb0c_h.jpg (accessed 31 October 2022).

101.

Vanberg

(2016) Competitive federalism, government’s dual role and the power to tax. Journal of Institutional Economics 12(4): 825–845.

102.

WDCEP (2013) DC neighborhood profiles. Report, The Washington DC Economic Partnership. Available at: http://wdcep.com (accessed 5 October 2022).

103.

WDCEP (2020) DC neighborhood profiles. Report, The Washington DC Economic Partnership. Available at: http://wdcep.com (accessed 5 October 2022).

104.

Weiss

(2002) The economic resurgence of Washington, DC: Citizens plan for prosperity in the 21st century. global urban development. Chairman and CEO Global Urban Development. Available at: http://www.globalurban.org/Lessons_of_WDC_Economic_Strategy.pdf (accessed April 19 2023).

105.

Weiss

(2008) North Massachusetts avenue (NoMa) initiative, USA. Report. Review of Local Economic and Employment Development Policy Approaches in OECD Countries. OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/42751285.pdf (accessed 19 April 2023).

106.

Wilson

(2009) Introduction: Racialized poverty in US cities: Toward a refined racial economy perspective. Professional Geography 61(2): 139–149.

107.

Zitcer

(2020) Making up creative placemaking. Journal of Planning Education and Research 40(3): 278–288.

108.

Zukin

(1982) Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.