The increasing occurrence of discontent and conflict regarding making creative cities across the globe has led scholars to pay significant attention to the political dimension of creative-city policies. This study, by exploring the controversy over the Incheon Art Platform, a warehouse-turned art space in Incheon, South Korea, offers a situated understanding of how the city government’s entrepreneurial approach to the creative city was resisted and reinterpreted by local civil society groups. Against the backdrop of enhanced urban entrepreneurialism and the rise of civil activism in Incheon, the arrival of the creative city concept has generated opposing interpretations of the role of art and culture between the city government and civil society groups. Given the state’s expansionist policy toward the cultural sector in the nation, the entrepreneurial version of a creative city was first resisted by local cultural actors along with government-sponsored artists and subsequently sparked an artist-inspired anti-entrepreneurism protest in the city. This paper demonstrated how the creative city became a subject of political struggle within the unique relationship between the state and the cultural sector in South Korea, thereby contributing to enriching global urban knowledge on making and remaking creative cities beyond the Global North.
Alternative Space LOOP (2024) About Alternative Space LOOP. Available at: http://altspaceloop.com/about (accessed 5 September 2024).
2.
Art Council Korea and Institute for Culture and Society (2008) The Current Situation of Alternative Spaces in Korea. Art Council Korea (in Korean).
3.
BanIJ (2008) A study on the first generation of alternative spaces in Korea, 1999–2008: From “neutral” spaces to “reverent” spaces. In: SsamjiS (ed.) Why Do We Ask About an Alternative Space?Seoul: Mediabus, pp.8–33 (in Korean).
4.
BuserMBonuraCFanninM, et al. (2013) Cultural activism and the politics of place-making. City17(5): 606–627.
5.
ChoiBD (2011) Neoliberal urbanization and projects of Entrepreneurial City. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea14(3): 263–285 (in Korean).
6.
EvansG (2005) Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies42(5/6): 959–983.
7.
FloridaR (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
8.
FloridaR (2005) The Flight of the Creative Class: The Global Competition for Talent. Toronto: Collins.
9.
HanM (2009) The Asia Pacific Cities Summit will be held in Incheon. Incheon Today, September3, 2009.
10.
HarveyD (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler71(1): 3–17.
11.
HeSWangJ (2019) State-led creative/cultural city making and its contestations in East Asia: A multi-scalar analysis of the entrepreneurial state and the creative class. Geoforum106: 305–309.
12.
HubbardPHallT (1998) The entrepreneurial city and the “new urban politics”. In: HallTHubbardP (eds.) The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.8–33.
13.
IFAC (Incheon Foundation for Art and Culture) (2010) White Paper for the Five Years of the Incheon Foundation for Art and Culture. Incheon: Incheon Foundation for Art and Culture (in Korean).
14.
Incheon Metropolitan City (2016) Incheon open port creative city: a model of creative economy combining ocean, culture, and tourism (press release), 20January2016. Incheon: Incheon Metropolitan City (in Korean).
15.
Incheon Metropolitan City (2020) Incheon Open Port Creative City, Urban Regeneration Activation Plan (2020 Revision). Incheon: Incheon Metropolitan City (in Korean).
16.
JessopBSumNL (2000) An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong’s emerging strategies in and for (inter) urban competition. Urban Studies37(12): 2287–2313.
17.
JooYMParkSH (2017) Overcoming urban growth coalition: The case of culture-led urban revitalization in Busan South Korea. Urban Affairs Review53(5): 843–867.
18.
KimC (2017) Locating creative city policy in East Asia: Neoliberalism, developmental state and assemblage of East Asian cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy23(3): 312–330.
19.
KimD (2023) Lee Hee-Whan, the leader of the Network for Urban Publicness of Incheon, a protector of modern cultural heritage, Kiho-ilbo, 20September2023 (accessed 1 May 2024) (in Korean).
20.
LancioneMMcFarlaneC (eds)(2021) Global Urbanism: Knowledge, Power and the City. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
21.
LandryC (2000) The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.
22.
LandryCBianchiniF (1995) The Creative City. London: Demos.
23.
LauermannJ (2018) Municipal statecraft: Revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 205–224.
24.
LeeH (2010) One year after the launch of the Art Platform. Hwanghae Munwha69(3): 3335–3347 (in Korean).
25.
LeeH (2015) The launch of the Network for Urban Publicness of Incheon, seeking critical engagement of urban space. Incheon-in. 6March2015. Available at: https://www.incheonin.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=28504 (accessed 1 May 2024) (in Korean).
26.
LeeHK (2019) Cultural Policy in South Korea: Making a New Patron State. London & New York: Routledge.
27.
LeeJ (2014) The Incheon Foundation for Art and Culture (IFAC) should be responsible for the Incheon Art Platform incident. Incheon-In, 21August2014. Available at: http://www.incheonin.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=26350 (accessed 25 April 2023) (in Korean).
LugerJD (2019) When the creative class strikes back: State-led creativity and its discontents. Geoforum106: 330–339.
30.
MarkusenA (2006) Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A38(10): 1921–1940.
31.
MazzucatoM (2011) The Entrepreneurial State. London: Demos.
32.
MilesM (2005) Interruptions: Testing the rhetoric of culturally led urban development. Urban Studies42(5/6): 889–911.
33.
MinU (2009) The worrisome launch of the Incheon Art Platform. Hwanghae Munwha63(1): 397–407 (in Korean).
34.
MinUG (2014) Looking back at urban cultural policies in Incheon: Developmentalism and instrumental cultural policies. In: ParkSH (ed.) Beyond Creative Cities: From Cultural Developmentalism to Creative Community. Gyeong-gi: Nanam Publisher, pp.273–305 (in Korean).
35.
NovyJColombC (2013) Struggling for the right to the (creative)city in Berlin and Hamburg: New urban social movements, new “spaces of hope”?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(5): 1816–1838.
36.
ParkH (2014) Protesting against the Baengryeong-do project, adrift for three months. Dong-a-ilbo16October2014 (in Korean).
37.
ParkSH (2016) Can we implant an artist community? A reflection on government-led cultural districts in Korea. Cities56: 172–179.
38.
PeckJ (2005) Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29(4): 740–770.
39.
QuilleyS (2000) Manchester first: From municipal socialism to the entrepreneurial city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(3): 601–615.
40.
SharonB (1979) Artist-run galleries—A contemporary institutional change in the visual arts. Qualitative Sociology2(1): 3–28.
41.
ShinH (2020) The Cultural Politics of Urban Development in South Korea: Art, Memory and Urban Boosterism in Gwangju. New York: Routledge.
42.
ShinHB (2016) Envisioned by the state: Entrepreneurial urbanism and the making of Songdo City, South Korea. In: DattaAShabanA (eds.) Mega-Urbanization in the Global South: Fast Cities and New Urban Utopias of the Postcolonial State. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp.83–100.
43.
ShinHB (2021) Theorising from where? Reflections on de-centering global (South) urbanism. In: LancioneMMcFarlaneC (eds.) Global Urbanism: Knowledge, Power and the City. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp.62–71.
44.
ShinHParkSHSonnJW (2015) The emergence of a multiscalar growth regime and scalar tension: The politics of urban development in Songdo New City, South Korea. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy33(6): 1618–1638.
45.
ShinHStevensQ (2013) How culture and economy meet in South Korea: The politics of cultural economy in culture-led urban regeneration. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(5): 1707–1723.
46.
Space Beam (2023) What is Space Beam? Available at: https://spacebeam.net/about (accessed 25 April 2023) (in Korean).
47.
SternMJSeifertSC (2007) Culture and Neighborhood Revitalization: A Harvest Document. Philadelphia: The Reinvestment Fund.
VignauMGrondeauA (2021) Arts, culture and neoliberalism: Instrumentalization and resistance in the case of Marseille. In: UnalıT (ed.) Art and Gentrification in the Changing Neoliberal Landscape. New York: Routledge, pp.57–74.
50.
WangJOakesTYangY (eds.) (2016) Making Cultural Cities in Asia: Mobility, Assemblage, and the Politics of Aspirational Urbanism. London & New York: Routledge.
51.
YangJ (2015) The Incheon Art Platform: From establishment to operation. In: The Achievement and Development Direction of the Incheon Art Platform. Incheon: The Incheon Foundation for Art and Culture and The Incheon Art Platform (in Korean).
52.
YangS (2018) The Sangsang Platform that gives preferential favor must be stopped. The Incheon News13August2018 (accessed 1 May 2024) (in Korean).
53.
ZukinS (1995) The Cultures of Cities. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.
