In 2016, Auckland implemented a widespread upzoning to encourage medium density infill housing. This article describes the institutional processes preceding the reform, quantifies the changes in land use across the metropolitan area and documents subsequent changes in residential housing starts. We show that approximately three-quarters of residential land was upzoned, predominantly in areas close to transportation network access, and between 5 and 25 km of the central business district (CBD). Six years on from the reform, housing starts have increased; are located closer to the CBD, employment locations and transportation network access points; and are predominantly infill and attached housing. Spatial decompositions show that these patterns are exclusively driven by changes in housing starts in upzoned areas.
BertaudABruecknerJK (2005) Analyzing building-height restrictions: Predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics35(2): 109–125.
3.
BiddleTBertoiaTGreavesS, et al. (2006) The costs of infill versus greenfield development: A review of recent literature. In: Proceedings of the 29th Australian transport research forum, Gold Coast, Australia, 27–29 September 2006. Gold Coast: Queensland Transport.
4.
BlakeleyR (2015) The planning framework for Auckland ‘Super City’: An insider’s view. Policy Quarterly11(4): 3–14.
5.
BruecknerJKSinghR (2020) Stringency of land-use regulation: Building heights in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics116: 103239.
6.
BruecknerJKFuSGuY (2017) Measuring the stringency of land use regulation: The case of China’s building height limits. Review of Economics and Statistics99(4): 663–677.
7.
DongH (2024) Exploring the impacts of zoning and upzoning on housing development: A quasi-experimental analysis at the parcel level. Journal of Planning Education and Research44(1): 403–415.
8.
EhrlichMVHilberCALSchöniO (2018) Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Housing Economics42: 4–18.
FischelWA (2002) The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
FischelWA (2008) Political structure and exclusionary zoning: Are small suburbs the big problem? In: HongY-HIngramGK (eds) Fiscal Decentralization and Land Policies. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp.111–136.
12.
FosterDWarrenJ (2022) The NIMBY problem. Journal of Theoretical Politics34(1): 145–172.
13.
FreemanLSchuetzJ (2017) Producing affordable housing in rising markets: What works?Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research19(1): 217–236.
14.
FreemarkY (2020) Upzoning Chicago: Impacts of a zoning reform on property values and housing construction. Urban Affairs Review56(3): 758–789.
GlaeserEL (2008) Cities, Agglomeration and Spatial Equilibrium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
GlaeserELGyourkoJE (2005) The impact of zoning on housing affordability. FRBNY Economic Policy Review. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.302388.
18.
GrayMNMillsapAA (2023) Subdividing the unzoned city: An analysis of the causes and effects of Houston’s 1998 subdivision reform. Journal of Planning Education and Research43(4): 990–1006.
Greenaway-McGrevyR (forthcoming) Evaluating the long-run effects of zoning reform on urban development. Regional Science and Urban Economics. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4439532.
MaltmanMGreenaway-McGrevyR (forthcoming) Going it alone: The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Lower Hutt. Journal of Housing Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhe.2024.102032.
27.
ManvilleMMonkkonenPLensM (2020) It’s time to end single-family zoning. Journal of the American Planning Association86(1): 106–112.
28.
MeyerBD (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics13(2): 151–161.
SaizA (2010) The geographic determinants of housing supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics125(3): 1253–1296.
32.
SchillMH (2005) Regulations and housing development: What we know. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research8(1): 5–19.
33.
StacyCDavisCFreemarkYS, et al. (2023) Land-use reforms and housing costs: Does allowing for increased density lead to greater affordability?Urban Studies60(14): 2919–2940.
34.
TanYWangZZhangQ (2020) Land-use regulation and the intensive margin of housing supply. Journal of Urban Economics115: 103199.
35.
WegmannJ (2020) Death to single-family zoning … and new life to the missing middle. Journal of the American Planning Association86(1): 113–119.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
