Mobile homes can be produced in high volumes at a lower cost than traditional stick-built single-family dwellings but face regulatory, financial, and perceptual barriers to more widespread market penetration. This research relies on data from a sample of US cities and counties to examine the influence of local land use regulations on the concentration of new mobile homes among all new homes added over two 10-year time spans. In contrast to previous studies, this study relies on a nationwide sample of jurisdictions, employs more precise measures of mobile home placements and local land use regulations, and addresses the endogeneity of mobile home restrictions. I find that regulatory restrictions on mobile homes and urban containment boundaries both limit the concentration of new mobile homes. Furthermore, the impact of mobile home restrictions is much larger when accounting for the endogeneity of mobile home restrictions. These findings suggest that land use regulatory reform can play an important role in local affordable housing strategies geared towards expanding the supply of mobile homes.
AwABrownLYeaA (n.d.) Identifying the Opportunities to Expand Manufactured Housing. Washington, DC: Freddie Mac.
2.
BeamishJOGossRCAtilesJH, et al. (2001) Not a trailer anymore: Perceptions of manufactured housing. Housing Policy Debate12(2):373–392.
3.
BeckerCRickertT (2019) Zoned out? The determinants of manufactured housing rents: Evidence from North Carolina. Journal of Housing Economics46: 101626–101717.
4.
BoehmTP (1995) A comparison of the determinants of structural quality between manufactured housing and conventional tenure choices: Evidence from the American Housing Survey. Journal of Housing Economics4(4):373–391.
5.
BoehmTPSchlottmannA (2008) Is manufactured owned housing a good alternative for low-income households? Evidence from the American housing survey. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research10(2):159–224.
6.
BrooksMMMuellerJT (2020) Factors affecting mobile home prevalence in the United States: Poverty, natural amenities, and employment in natural resources. Population Space and Place26(4):1–13.
7.
DawkinsCJ (2021) Just Housing: The Moral Foundations of American Housing Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
DawkinsCJKoebelCT (2010) Overcoming barriers to placing manufactured housing in metropolitan communities. Journal of the American Planning Association76(1):73–88.
9.
DawkinsCJKoebelTCavellM, et al. (2011) Regulatory Barriers to Manufactured Housing Placement in Urban Communities. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
10.
DurstNJSullivanE (2019) The contribution of manufactured housing to affordable housing in the United States: Assessing variation among manufactured housing tenures and community types. Housing Policy Debate29(6):880–898.
HerbertCHermannAMcCueD, et al. (2024) A Review of Barriers to Greater Use of Manufactured Housing for Entry-Level Homeownership. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.
13.
HerbertCReedCShenJ (2023) Comparison of the Costs of Manufactured and Site-Built Housing. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.
14.
HirschWZ (1988) An inquiry into the effects of mobile home park rent control. Journal of Urban Economics24(2):212–226.
15.
HirschWZRufoloAM (1999) The regulation of immobile housing assets under divided ownership. International Review of Law and Economics19(3):383–397.
16.
LoLGallagherMPendallR, et al. (2019) National Longitudinal Land Use Survey. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Available at: https://datacatalog.urban.org/dataset/national-longitudinal-land-use-survey-nllus (accessed 8 November 2023). Data developed at the Urban Institute and made available under the ODC-BY 1.0 Attribution License.
17.
MandelkerDR (2016) Zoning barriers to manufactured housing. The Urban Lawyer48(2):233–278.
18.
Manufactured Housing Institute (2006) Understanding Today’s Manufactured Housing. Arlington, VA: Manufactured Housing Institute.
19.
MasonCQuigleyJM (2004) The curious institution of mobile home rent control: A case study of mobile home parks in California. Program on Housing and Urban Policy Working Paper No. W04-007. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
20.
PapkeLEWooldridgeJM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Economics11: 619–632.
21.
PapkeLEWooldridgeJM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics145: 121–133.
22.
PierceGGabbeCJGonzalezSR (2018) Improperly-zoned, spatially-marginalized, and poorly-served? An analysis of mobile home parks in Los Angeles County. Land Use Policy76: 178–185.
23.
RumbachASullivanEMcMullenS, et al. (2022) You don’t need zoning to be exclusionary: Manufactured home parks, land-use regulations and housing segregation in the Houston metropolitan area. Land Use Policy123: 106422.
24.
SullivanE (2022) Personal, not real: Manufactured housing insecurity, real property, and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science18: 119–138.
25.
SullivanEMakarewiczCRumbachA (2022) Affordable but marginalized: A sociospatial and regulatory analysis of mobile home parks in the Houston metropolitan area. Journal of the American Planning Association88(2):232–244.
26.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] (1998) Factory and site-built housing: A comparative analysis. NAHB Research Center Report for the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, October. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
27.
VanderfordSMimuraYSweaneyA (2005) A hedonic price comparison of manufactured and site-built homes in the non-MSA U.S. Journal of Real Estate Research27(1):83–104.
28.
WheelerCAJargowskyPA (2018) Race, land use regulation, and housing affordability. Working Paper, Rutgers University. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3199298 (accessed 11 December 2023).
29.
ZhouY (2013) The decision to purchase a manufactured home: A nested logit model of determinants. International Journal of Housing Policy13(3):268–287.
