Digital technologies provide numerous opportunities for adolescents but also pose risks such as overuse and addiction. This study examined the long-term effects of parental autonomy support (promotion of independence and promotion of volitional functioning) on adolescents’ digital addiction and negative identity perception. The study included 318 mid-adolescents (Mage = 16.68; 184 females, 134 males). The results showed that baseline promotion of independence and volitional functioning were negatively associated with digital addiction and negative identity perception at the 4-month follow-up. Furthermore, negative identity perception (T2) mediated the relationship between promotion of independence (T1) and promotion of volitional functioning (T1) with digital addiction (T2). These findings highlight the crucial role of parental autonomy support in reducing digital addiction and negative identity perception.
AgustinS.HafidlohN.DamayantiL. P.AbadiT. W. (2024). Transforming teen communication through the visual ınfluence of social media. Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 15(3), 10–21070.
2.
Arıcı-ŞahinF.Knudson-MartinC. (2023). Socio-emotional relationship therapy in Turkey: Navigating equity and sociocultural change. International Journal of Systemic Therapy, 35(1), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398x.2023.2228183
3.
AvehM. C. (2015). Emotional autonomy and parental styles as a predictor of positive identity style [Conference session]. Proceedings of The 20th International Academic Conferences 3105278, Madrid.
4.
AzizM.ErbadA.Brahim BelhaouariS.AbdelmoneiumA. O.Al-HarahshehS.BagdadyA.AliR. (2022). The interplay between adolescents’ Internet addiction and family-related factors: Three common patterns. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2115307
5.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
6.
ÇelikF.AkkoyunA. Z. (2022). The relationship of internet addiction with identity confusion and self-esteem: An empirical evaluation. The Kastamonu Journal of Communication Studies, 9, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.56676/kiad.1176320
7.
ÇelikO. T.TunçY.CandemirB.Kapkın-İçenB.AçarD. (2023). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish adaptation of the Digital Addiction Scale for Teenagers (DAST). Journal of Inonu University Health Services Vocational School, 11(3), 1715–1728. https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1288302
8.
ChenC. Y.ChenI. H.PakpourA. H.LinC. Y.GriffithsM. D. (2021). Internet-related behaviors and psychological distress among schoolchildren during the COVID-19 school hiatus. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 24(10), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0497
9.
ChenY. L.ChenS. H.GauS. S. F. (2015). ADHD and autistic traits, family function, parenting style, and social adjustment for Internet addiction among children and adolescents in Taiwan: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.025
10.
ChengY.JiangS. (2024). Peer relationship problems, fear of missing out, family affective responsiveness, and internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Applied Research Quality Life, 19, 2227–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10328-7
11.
ChouC.LeeY. H. (2017). The moderating effects of internet parenting styles on the relationship between internet parenting behavior, internet expectancy, and internet addiction tendency. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0334-5
12.
CollinsW. A.GleasonT.ve SesmaA.Jr. (1997). Internalization, autonomy, and relationships: Development during adolescence. In GrusecJ. E.KuczynskiL. (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 78–99). Wiley.
13.
De LiseF.LuyckxK.CrocettiE. (2024). Identity matters for well-being: The longitudinal associations between identity processes and well-being in adolescents with different cultural backgrounds. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53, 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01901-8
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). Commentaries on “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.”Psychological Inquiry, 11, 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_02.
15.
DingQ.LiD.ZhouY.DongH.LuoJ. (2017). Perceived parental monitoring and adolescent internet addiction: A moderated mediation model. Addictive Behaviors, 74, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.033
16.
DongH.YangF.LuX.HaoW. (2020). Internet addiction and related psychological factors among children and adolescents in China during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemic. Front Psychiatry, 11, 00751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00751
17.
DuanL.ShaoX.WangY.HuangY.MiaoJ.YangX.ZhuG. (2020). An investigation of mental health status of children and adolescents in China during the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Affective Disorders, 275, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.029
18.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity youth and crisis (No. 7). WW Norton & company.
19.
ErsanlıK.ŞanlıE. (2015). Self-perceived identity scale: A scale development study. American International Journal of Social Science, 4(6), 184–194.
20.
FaltýnkováA.BlinkaL.ŠevčíkováA.HusarovaD. (2020). The associations between family-related factors and excessive internet use in adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051754
21.
FletcherA. C.MccurdyA.WilliamsK. N.Benito-GomezM.CheeksB. L. (2024). Autonomy-supportive parenting as a moderator of associations between ethnic and racial identity processes and psychological adjustment during college. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000684
22.
GözükaraÖ. İ. (2019). Ebeveyn özerklik desteği ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması [Unpublished master thesis]. İstanbul Arel University.
23.
GrolnickW. S. (2009). The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104321.
24.
GrolnickW. S.FarkasM. (2002). Parenting and the development of children’s self-regulation. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Practical issues in parenting (2nd ed., pp. 89–110). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
25.
GrolnickW. S.PomerantzE. M. (2009). Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00099.x
26.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M.DeciE. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.
27.
GugliandoloM. C.CostaS.KussD. J.CuzzocreaF.VerrastroV. (2020). Technological addiction in adolescents: The interplay between parenting and psychological basic needs. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 1389–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00156-4
28.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Methodology in the Social Sciences) (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
29.
HoangK. M. (2015). Conceptualizing adolescents’ autonomy: Parental support and adolescent’s perception. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(11), 273–282.
30.
HsiehK. Y.HsiaoR. C.YangY. H.LeeK. H.YenC. F. (2019). Relationship between self-identity confusion and internet addiction among college students: The mediating effects of psychological ınflexibility and experiential avoidance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 3225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173225.
31.
JoussemetM.LandryR.KoestnerR. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 194–200.
32.
KadanG.AralN. (2024). Review of studies addressing the issue of fighting addiction during adolescence in Türkiye: Technology and substance addiction. Journal of Dependence, 25(4), 451–467. https://dio.org/10.51982/bagimli.1432282
33.
KağıtçıbaşıÇ. (1996). Özerk-ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez [Autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis]. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 11(37), 36–43.
34.
KaniušonytėG.LaursenB. (2022). Perceptions of positive parenting predict increases in resilience for low neurotic and high agreeable adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111272
35.
KingD. L.DelfabbroP. H.BillieuxJ.PotenzaM. N. (2020). Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(2), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00016
36.
KooH. J.KwonJ. H. (2014). Risk and protective factors of internet addiction: A meta-analysis of empirical studies in Korea. Yonsei Medical Journal, 55(6), 1691. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1691
37.
KorA.ShoshaniA. (2023). Moderating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s and adolescents’ substance use, digital media use, and mental health: A randomized positive psychology addiction prevention program. Addictive Behaviors, 141, 107660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107660.
38.
KussD. J.GriffithsM. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311.
39.
KwakY.KimH.AhnJ. W. (2022). Impact of Internet usage time on mental health in adolescents: Using the 14th Korea youth risk behavior web-based survey 2018. PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0264948. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264948
40.
LiC.DangJ.ZhangX.ZhangQ.GuoJ. (2014). Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: The effect of parental behavior and self-control. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.001
41.
LiD.ZhangW.LiX.ZhenS.WangY. (2010). Stressful life events and problematic internet use by adolescent females and males: A mediated moderation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1199–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.031
42.
LiH.LuoM.DuanB.KawuliaA.SuM.DiH. (2024). Family socioeconomic status and young children digital addiction: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1435575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435575
43.
LinM. P. (2020). Prevalence of internet addiction during the COVID-19 outbreak and its risk factors among junior high school students in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228547
44.
LiuD.WangZ.YangX.ZhangY.ZhangR.LinS. (2021). Perceived autonomy-supportive parenting and internet addiction: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia moderated the mediating effect of basic psychological need satisfaction. Current Psychology, 40, 4255–4264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00485-6
45.
LukavskáK.HrabecO.LukavskýJ.DemetrovicsZ.KirályO. (2022). The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviours, 135, 107423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107423.
46.
MaC.MaY.LanX. (2022). Parental autonomy support and pathological internet use among Chinese undergraduate students: Gratitude moderated the mediating effect of filial piety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052644
47.
MarciaJ. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). Wiley.
48.
NieJ.ZhangW.LiuY. (2016). Exploring depression, self-esteem and verbal fluency with different degrees of internet addiction among Chinese college students. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 72, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.10.006
49.
OkurameD. E.OladipoM.UyeE. E. (2024). Self-esteem, health locus of control and resilient personality as predictors of substance abuse among in-school adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 11(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajada.v11i1.6
50.
O’ReillyC.MohanG. (2023). Parental influences on excessive Internet use among adolescents. Internet Research, 33(7), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2021-0904
51.
ÖztürkF. O.Ayaz-AlkayaS. (2021). Internet addiction and psychosocial problems among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 35(6), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2021.08.007
52.
ParkS.LeeY.JunJ. Y. (2017). Differences in the relationship between traumatic experiences, self-esteem, negative cognition, and internet addiction symptoms among North Korean adolescent defectors and South Korean adolescents: A preliminary study. Psychiatry Research, 257, 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.078
53.
Peláez-FernándezM. A.Mérida-LópezS.YudesC.ExtremeraN. (2024). How can the social family climate contribute to emotional intelligence in preventing suicidal ideation and promoting life satisfaction among adolescents?. Applied Research Quality Life, 19, 2915–2932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10354-5
54.
PowersT. A.MooreE.LevineS.HoldingA.ZuroffD. C.KoestnerR. (2023). Autonomy support buffers the impact of self-criticism on depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 200, 111876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111876
55.
ReedK.DuncanJ. M.Lucier-GreerM.FixelleC.FerraroA. J. (2016). Helicopter parenting and emerging adult self-efficacy: Implications for mental and physical health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 3136–3149.
56.
ReeveJ.JangH.HardreP.OmuraM. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 183–207.
57.
RyanR.DeciE. (2000). Self–determination theory and the facilitation of ıntrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
58.
SchwartzS. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(1), 7–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XSCHWARTZ
59.
SeemaR.HeidmetsM.KonstabelK.Varik-MaasikE. (2022). Development and validation of the Digital Addiction Scale for Teenagers (DAST). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(2), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211056394
60.
ShekD. T.YuL. (2012). Internet addiction phenomenon in early adolescents in Hong Kong. The Scientific World Journal, 2012(1), 104304. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/104304
61.
ShekD. T.YuL. (2016). Adolescent internet addiction in Hong Kong: Prevalence, change, and correlates. Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology, 29(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.10.005
ShiX.WangJ.ZouH. (2017). Family functioning and Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of self-esteem and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.028
64.
ShutzmanB.GershyN. (2023). Children’s excessive digital media use, mental health problems and the protective role of parenting during COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107559
65.
SilkJ. S.MorrisA. S.KanayaT.SteinbergL. (2003). Psychological control and autonomy granting: Opposite ends of a continuum or distinct constructs?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 113–128.
66.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.Van PetegemS. (Eds.). (2017). Autonomy in adolescent development: Towards conceptual clarity (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636511
67.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
68.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001
69.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.LensW.LuyckxK.GoossensL.BeyersW.RyanR. M. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.633
70.
SteinbergL.SilkJ. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In BornsteinM. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting (pp. 103–133). Erlbaum.
71.
SteinbergL.SilverbergS. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841–851.
72.
SunY.WilkinsonJ. S. (2020). Parenting style, personality traits, and interpersonal relationships: a model of prediction of internet addiction. International Journal of Communication, 14, 23.
73.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
74.
TuncaA. (2024). Adolescents’ perceptions of autonomy-supportive parents and social-emotional health: Serial multiple mediation of positive stress and mental toughness. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 34(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/20556365241295297
75.
WuW.GuoZ.LiS.TuF.WuX.MaX.TengZ.ChenY.ZengY. (2022). The influence of parental autonomy support on cyberbullying victimization of high school students: A latent moderation analysis. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103739
76.
YoungK. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
