The paper has two aims. First, to show that we need social mechanisms to establish the policy relevance of causal claims, even if it is possible to build a good argument for those claims without knowledge of mechanisms. Second, to show that although social scientists can, in principle, do without social mechanisms when they argue for causal claims, in reality scientific practice contexts where they do not need mechanisms are very rare.
De Mey, T., and E. Weber.2003. Explanation and thought experiments in history. History and Theory42:28-38.
2.
Jones, R.A.1996. Research methods in the social and behavioral sciences . Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates .
3.
Kershaw, D.N.1972. A negative income tax experiment. Scientific American227 (4): 19-25.
4.
Little, D.1991. Varieties of social explanation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
Pasternak, B.1978. The sociology of irrigation: Two Taiwanese villages. In Studies in Chinese society, ed. A. Wolf.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Reynolds, P.D.1982. Ethics and social science research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Schmidtz, D.1995. Observing the unobservable. In The reliability of economic models, edited by D. Little, pp. 147-172. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8.
Selten, R.2003. Emergence and future of experimental economics. In Observation and experiment in the natural and social sciences, edited by M. C. Galavotti, pp. 63-70. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9.
Smith, E., and R. Wright.1992. Why is automobile insurance in Philadelphia so damn expensive? American Economic Review82:756-772.
10.
Steel, D.2004. Social mechanisms and causal inference. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34:55-78.
