A debate over the possibilities for foundations of knowledge has been a key feature of theoretical discussions in the discipline of International Relations. A number of recent contributions suggest that this debate is still active. This article offers a contribution to this debate by suggesting that the study of complexity may provide a contingent foundation for the study of international relations. We examine the grounds on which such a claim might be made, and examine the implications for taking complexity as a foundational claim.
CudworthE.HobdenS.2009. More than a metaphor: Complexity in the social sciences. Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science4 (4): 59-70.
18.
DesslerD.1991. Beyond correlations: Toward a causal theory of war. International Studies Quarterly35 (3): 337-55.
19.
DillonM.2000. Poststructuralism, complexity, and poetics. Theory Culture & Society, 17 (5): 1-26.
20.
EarnestD. C.RosenauJ. N.2006. Signifying nothing? What complex systems can and cannot tell us about global politics. In Complexity in world politics, edited by HarrisonN. E.Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
ElliottE.KielL. D.1997. Nonlinear dynamics, complexity, and public policy: Use, misuse, and applicability. In Chaos, complexity, and sociology, edited by EveR. A.HorsfallS.LeeM. E.London: Sage.
22.
FoucaultM.1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.
23.
GaddisJ. L.2002. The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Gulbenkian Commission. 1996. Open the social sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
GunaratneS. A.2003. Thank you Newton, welcome Prigogine: “Unthinking” old paradigms and embracing new directions. Communications28 (4): 435-55.
26.
HarrisonN., ed. 2006. Complexity in world politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
HobdenS.2002. Historical sociology: Back to the future of international relations. In Historical sociology of international relations, edited by HobdenS.HobsonJ.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HollingC. S.GundersonL. H.2002. Resilience and adaptive cycles. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, edited by GundersonL. H.HollingC. S.Washington, DC: Island Press.
29.
HollingC. S.GundersonL. H.PetersonG. D.2002. Sustainability and panarchies. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, edited by GundersonL. H.HollingC. S.Washington, DC: Island Press.
30.
Homer-DixonT.2009. The newest science: Replacing physics, ecology will be the master science of the 21st century. Alternatives Journal35 (4): 8-38.
31.
JacksonP. T.2009. A faulty solution to a false(ly characterized) problem: A comment on Monteiro and Ruby. International Theory1 (3): 455-65.
32.
JervisR.1997. System effects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
KauffmanS.1993. The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
KauffmanS.1995. At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. London: Viking.
35.
KauffmanS.2000. Investigations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
KavalskiE.2007. The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: Notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life. Cambridge Review of International Affairs20 (3): 435-54.
37.
KuhnT. S.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
38.
LapidY.1989. The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a postpositivist era. International Studies Quarterly33 (3): 235-54.
39.
LaplaceP. S.[1840] 1902. A philosophical essay on possibilities, translated from the French. 6th ed.New York: John Wiley.
40.
LawJ.UrryJ.2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society33 (3): 390-410.
41.
LektzianD.SouvaM.A comparative test of democratic peace arguments, 1946-2000. Journal of Peace Research46 (1): 17-37.
42.
LiebowitzS. J.MargulisS. E.1995. Path dependence, lock-in and history. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation11 (1): 205-26.
43.
LovelockJ.2000. Ages of Gaia: A biography of our living Earth. 2nd ed.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
LuhmannN.1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
MadisonG. B.1991. Philosophy without foundations. Reason Papers16:15-44.
46.
MahoneyJ.2000. Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory and Society29 (4): 507-48.
47.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J.1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Kulwer Academic.
48.
McGladeJ.GarnseyE.2006. The nature of complexity. In Complexity and co-evolution: Continuity and change in socio-economic systems, edited by McGladeJ.GarnseyE.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
49.
McLennanG.2006a. Complexity rules? Four complications, three dangers, two conclusions. Paper given to Symposium on Complexity Theory, University of Edinburgh. December 1.
50.
McLennanG.2006b. Sociological cultural studies: Reflexitivity and positivity in the human sciences. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
51.
McMillanE.2008. Complexity, management, and the dynamics of change: Challenges for practice. London: Routledge.
52.
MillerJ. H.PageS. E.2007. Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to the computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
MonteiroN. P.RubyK. G.2009. IR and the false promise of philosophical foundations. International Theory1 (1): 15-48.
54.
MorinE.2008. On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
55.
NeeV.CaoY.1999. Path dependent societal transformation: Stratification in mixed economies. Theory and Society28 (6): 799-834.
56.
NietzscheF.[1873] 2006. On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense. In The Nietzsche reader, edited by Ansell-PearsonK.LargeD.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
57.
NorthD.1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
PiersonP.2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review94 (2): 251-68.
59.
PiersonP., ed. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
PouliotV.2004. The essence of constructivism. Journal of International Relations and Development7 (3): 319-36.
61.
PrigogineI.2003. Is the future given?Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
62.
RosenauJ.1990. Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
SchefferM.WestleyF.BrockW. A.HolmgrenM.2002. Dynamic interaction of societies and ecosystems: Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, edited by GundersonL. H.HollingC. S.Washington, DC: Island Press.
65.
ShapiroI.2005. The flight from reality in the human sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
SmithS.1995. The self-images of a discipline: A genealogy of international relations theory. In International relations theory today, edited by BoothK.SmithS.Oxford, UK: Polity.
67.
SmithS.2004. Singing our world into existence: International relations theory and September 11. International Studies Quarterly48 (3): 499-515.
68.
StermanJ.2000. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
69.
StermanJ.2002. All models are wrong: Reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review18 (4): 501-31.
70.
StrandR.2007. Complexity, ideology, and governance. In Reframing complexity: Perspectives from north and south, edited by CapraF.JuarreroA.SotolongoP.van UdenJ.Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.
71.
UlanowiczR. E.2007. Ecology: A dialogue between the quick and the dead. In Reframing complexity: Perspectives from north and south edited by CapraF.JuarreroA.SotolongoP.van UdenJ.Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.
72.
UrryJ.2003. Global complexity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
73.
UrryJ.2004. The global complexities of September 11th. Theory, Culture & Society19 (4): 57-69.
74.
WalbyS.2007. Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences37 (4): 449-70.
75.
WalbyS.2009. Globalisation and inequalities: Complexity and contested modernities. London: Sage.
76.
WallersteinI.2000. From sociology to historical social science. British Journal of Sociology51 (1): 25-35.
77.
WaltzK. N.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
78.
WendtA.2006. Social theory as Cartesian science: An auto-critique from a quantum perspective. In Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics, edited by GuzziniS.LeanderA.London: Routledge.
79.
WestleyF.CarpenterS. R.BrockW. A.HollingC. S.GundersonL. H.2002. Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, edited by GundersonL. H.HollingC. S.Washington, DC: Island Press.
80.
WightC.2006. Agents, structures, and international relations: Politics as ontology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
WightC.2007. Inside the epistemological cave all bets are off. Journal of International Relations and Development10 (1): 40-56.
82.
WilczekF.2008. The lightness of being: Big questions, real answers. London: Allen Lane.
83.
WilsonE. O.1999. Consilience: The unity of knowledge. London: Abacus.
