Causal mechanisms theory (CMT) has provided an important contribution to the theory of social explanation. This article considers whether CMT also makes a contribution to improvement of social science methodology. Methodology serves as a guide to the construction of research questions and explanatory hypotheses. Research is guided by background assumptions about the ontology of the domain of investigation. CMT provides a valuable ontology for social science research. Furthermore, it provides a valuable research heuristic: “seek out the causal mechanisms that underlie an outcome of interest.” CMT does indeed have valuable implications for social science investigation, hypothesis formation, and research strategy.
AbbottAndrew Delano. 2004. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences, Contemporary Societies. New York: W.W. Norton.
2.
AdelmanIrmaMorrisCynthia Taft. 1973. Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
3.
AkerlofGeorge. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics84:488-500.
4.
BhaskarRoy. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books.
5.
BillariFrancesco C.FentThomasPrskawetzAlexiaScheffranJurgen. 2006. Agent-Based Computational Modelling: Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
6.
CalhounCraig J.2007. Sociology in America: A History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
CraverCarl F.DardenLindley. 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
Elder-VassDavid. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ElsterJon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EnsmingerJean. 1992. Making a Market: The Institutional Transformation of an African Society. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
GeddesBarbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Analytical Perspectives on Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13.
GeorgeAlexander L.BennettAndrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge: MIT Press.
GroffRuthGrecoJohn. 2013. Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. New York: Routledge.
16.
HedströmPeter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HedströmPeterBearmanPeter. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
HedströmPeterUdehnLars. 2009. “Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle Range.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 25-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology36:49-67.
20.
HeppenstallAlison J.2011. Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems. New York: Springer.
KimeldorfHoward. 1988. Reds or Rackets? The Making of Radical and Conservative Unions on the Waterfront. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
LittleDaniel. 1991. Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder: Westview Press.
25.
LittleDaniel. 2009. “The Heterogeneous Social.” In Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, edited by MantzavinosChrysostomos, 154-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
LittleDaniel. 2011. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Realm.” In Causality in the Sciences, edited by IllariPhyllisRussoFedericaWilliamsonJon, 273-295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
LittleDaniel. 2012. “Explanatory Autonomy and Coleman’s Boat.” Theoria, no. 27/2(74):137-52.
28.
MahoneyJames. 2001. “Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.” Sociological Forum16 (3): 575-93.
29.
MahoneyJamesThelenKathleen Ann. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
ManicasPeter T.2006. A Realist Philosophy of Social Science: Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
ManzoGianluca. 2010. “Analytical Sociology and Its Critics.” European Journal of Sociology51:129-70.
32.
MayntzRenate. 2004. “Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences34 (2): 237-59.
33.
McAdamDougTarrowSidney G.TillyCharles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MertonRobert King. 1967. On Theoretical Sociology; Five Essays, Old and New. Free Press Paperback. New York: The Free Press.
35.
MonroeKristen R.2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36.
RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
SarkeesMeredith ReidWaymanFrank Whelon. 2010. Resort to War: A Data Guide to Inter-State, Extra-State, Intra-State, and Non-State Wars, 1816-2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
38.
SkocpolTheda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2005. The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others, Politics, History, and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
40.
TarrowSidney. 2010. “The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice.” Comparative Political Studies43 (2): 230-59.
41.
ThelenKathleen Ann. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
YlikoskiPetri. 2012. “Micro, Macro, and Mechanisms.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, edited by KincaidHarold, 21-45. New York: Oxford University Press.
