A number of algebraic approaches to dichotomous data have attracted interest in the social sciences. Despite their underlying connections, these different approaches have different assumptions and realms of applicability. In particular, some approaches (which may be termed explanatory) assume a certain a process that generates the data, while others (which may be termed interpretive) give a parsimonious representation of data patterns irrespective of a generative process. The former may also be termed one-sided in that they privilege one dimension of a conventional data matrix, while the latter are dual, in that they do not do this. In certain cases, one-sided analyses can be combined to produce “joint” analyses, which differ from dual analyses. A consideration of these differences casts light on the information retrieved by the various methods.
Birkhoff, Garrett. [1940] 1967. Lattice Theory. Volume XXV, American Mathematical Society
2.
Colloquium Publications. Reprint, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
3.
Boorman, Scott A. and Harrison C. White. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks: II. Role Structures.”American Journal of Sociology81: 1384-1446.
4.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1979] 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Reprint, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Breiger, Ronald L.1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups.”Social Forces53: 181-190.
6.
Breiger, Ronald L.2000. “A Tool Kit for Practice Theory.”Poetics27: 91-115.
7.
Breiger, Ron L. and Philippa E. Pattison. 1986. “Cumulated Social Roles: The Duality of Persons and Their Algebras.”Social Networks8: 215-256.
8.
Carley, Kathleen. 1986. “Knowledge Acquisition as a Social Phenomenon.”Instructional Science14: 381-438.
9.
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library.
10.
Doreian, Patrick. 1990. “Mapping Networks Through Time.” Pp. 245-264 in Social Networks Through Time, edited by Jeroen Weesie and Henk Flap. Utrecht, The Netherlands: ISOR.
11.
Duquenne, Vincent. 1995. “Models of Possessions and Lattice Analysis.”Social Science Information34: 253-267.
Duquenne, Vincent. 1999. “Lattical Structures in Data Analysis.”Theoretical Computer Science217: 407-436.
14.
Freeman, Linton C.1996. “Cliques, Galois Lattices, and the Structure of Human Social Groups.”Social Networks18: 173-187.
15.
Freeman, Linton C. and Douglas R. White. 1993. “Using Galois Lattices to Represent Network Data.” Pp. 127-146 in Sociological Methodology 1993, edited by P. Marsden. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
16.
Ganter, Bernhard and Rudolf Wille. 1989. “Conceptual Scaling.” Pp. 139-167 in Applications of Combinatorics and Graph theory to the Biological and Social Sciences, edited by Fred Roberts. New York: Springer Verlag.
17.
Gould, Roger V.1996. “Patron-Client Ties, State Centralization, and the Whiskey Rebellion.”American Journal of Sociology102: 400-429.
18.
Homans, George C.1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
19.
Martin, John Levi. 2000. “The Relation of Aggregate Statistics on Beliefs to Culture and Cognition.”Poetics28: 5-20.
20.
Martin, John Levi. 2002. “Some Algebraic Structures for Diffusion in Social Networks.”Journal of Mathematical Sociology26: 123-146.
21.
Martin, John Levi and James Wiley. 2000. “Algebraic Representations of Beliefs and Attitudes II: Microbelief Models for Survey Data.”Sociological Methodology30: 123-164.
22.
Mische, Ann. 1998. “Projecting Democracy: Contexts and Dynamics of Youth Activism in the Brazilian Impeachment Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, New School for Social Research.
23.
Mische, Ann and Philippa Pattison. 2000. “Composing a Civic Arena: Publics, Projects, and Social Settings.”Poetics27: 163-194.
24.
Mohr, John and Vincent Duquenne. 1997. “The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888-1917.”Theory and Society26: 305-356.
25.
Mosier, Charles I.1941. “Psychophysics and Mental Test Theory: Fundamental Postulates and Elementary Theorems.”Psychological Review47: 355-366.
26.
Pattison, Philippa. 1993. Algebraic Models for Social Networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Rasch, Georg. 1966. “An Individualistic Approach to Item Analysis.” Pp. 89-107 in Readings in Mathematical Social Science, edited by Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Neil W. Henry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Simmel, Georg. [1922] 1955. “The Web of Group-Affiliations.” Translation of “Die Kreuzung sozialer Kreise,” pp. 305-344 of Soziologie, by Reinhard Bendix, appearing as 127-95 in Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Reprint, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
29.
Sperber, Dan. 1990. “The Epidemiology of Beliefs.” Pp. 25-44 in The Social Psychological Study of Widespread Beliefs, edited by Colin Fraser and George Gaskell. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
30.
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.”American Sociological Review51: 273-286.
31.
Van Mechelen, Iven, Paul De Beock, and Seymour Rosenberg. 1995. “The Conjunctive Model of Hierarchical Classes.”Psychometrika60: 505-521.
32.
Van Mechelen, Iven, Seymour Rosenberg, and Paul De Beock. 1997. “On Hierarchies and Hierarchical Classes Models.” In Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology: DIMACS Series on Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
33.
Wanderer, Jules J.1969. “An Empirical Study in the Sociology of Knowledge.”Sociological Inquiry39: 19-26.
34.
Weber, Max. [1919] 1946. “Science as a Vocation.” Pp. 129-156 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated and edited by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Reprint, New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Weil, Andre. 1969. “On the Algebraic Study of Certain Types of Marriage Laws (Murngin System).” Pp. 221-229 in Claude Levi Strauss, the Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.
36.
White, Douglas R.1996. “Statistical Entailments and the Galois Lattice.”Social Networks18: 201-215.
37.
White, Douglas R. and Paul Jorion. 1996. “Kinship Networks and Discrete Structure Theory: Applications and Implications.”Social Networks18: 267-314.
38.
White, Harrison C.1963. An Anatomy of Kinship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Whyte, William Foote. 1981. Street Corner Society. 3rd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Wiley, James and John Levi Martin. 1999. “Algebraic Representations of Beliefs and Attitudes: Partial Order Models.”Sociological Methodology29: 113-146.
