Definitions of direct and indirect effects are given for settings in which individuals are clustered in groups or neighborhoods and in which treatments are administered at the group level. A particular intervention may affect individual outcomes both through its effect on the individual and by changing the group or neighborhood itself. Identification conditions are given for controlled direct effects and for natural direct and indirect effects. The interpretation of these identification conditions are discussed within the context of neighborhood research and multilevel modeling. Interventions at a single point in time and time-varying interventions are both considered. The definition of direct and indirect effects requires certain stability or no-interference conditions; some discussion is given as to how these no-interference conditions can be relaxed.
Avin, C., I. Shipster, and J. Pearl.2005. ‘‘Identifiability of Path-Specific Effects.’’ Pp. 357-63 in Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
2.
Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny.1986. ‘‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations .’’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51:1173-82.
3.
Bollen, K.A.1987. ‘‘Total, Direct and Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models.’’ Pp. 37-69 in Sociological Methodology, edited by C. C. Clogg.Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
4.
Browning, C.R., D. Wallace, S. Feinberg, and K.A. Cagney.2006. ‘‘Neighborhood Social Processes and Disaster-Related Mortality: The Case of the 1995 Chicago Heat Wave. ’’ American Sociological Review71:665-82.
5.
Cole, S.R. and C.E. Frangakis.2009. ‘‘The Consistency Assumption in Causal Inference: A Definition or an Assumption?’’Epidemiology20:3-5.
6.
Cole, S.R. and M.A. Hernán.2002. ‘‘Fallibility in Estimating Direct Effects.’’ International Journal of Epidemiology31:163-65.
7.
Cox, D.R.1958. The Planning of Experiments. New York : John Wiley.
8.
Del Conte, A. and J. Kling.2001. ‘‘A Synthesis of Mto Research on Self-Sufficiency, Safety and Health, and Behavior and Delinquency.’’Poverty Research News5: 3-6.
9.
Diez-Roux, A.V., F.J. Nieto, and C. Muntaner.1997. ‘‘Neighborhood Environments and Coronary Heart Disease: A Multilevel Analysis.’’ American Journal of Epidemiology146:48-63.
10.
Frangakis, C.E., and D.B. Rubin.2002. ‘‘Principal Stratification in Causal Inference.’’ Biometrics58:21-9.
11.
Gallop, R., D.S. Small, J.Y. Lin, M.R. Elliott, M. Joffe, and T.R. Ten Have .2009. ‘‘Mediation Analysis With Principal Stratification.’’Statistics in Medicine28:1108-30.
12.
Gitelman, A.I.2005. ‘‘Estimating Causal Effects From Multilevel Group-Allocation Data.’’ Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics30:397-412.
13.
Greenland, S., J. Pearl, and J.M. Robins.1999. ‘‘Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic Research.’’ Epidemiology10:37-48.
14.
Hafeman, D.M. and S. Schwartz.2009. ‘‘Opening the Black Box: A Motivation for the Assessment of Mediation.’’International Journal of Epidemiology38:838-45.
15.
Hafeman, D.M. and T.J. VanderWeele. Forthcoming. ‘‘Alternative Assumptions for the Identification of Direct and Indirect Effects.’’Epidemiology.
16.
Holland, P.W.1988. ‘‘Causal Inference, Path Analysis, and Recursive Structural Equations Models.’’ Pp. 449-84 in Sociological Methodology , edited by C. C. Clogg.Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
17.
Hong, G. and S.W. Raudenbush.2006. ‘‘Evaluating Kindergarten Retention Policy: A Case Study of Causal Inference for Multilevel Observational Data. ’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association101:901-10.
18.
Hong, G. and S.W. Raudenbush.2008. ‘‘Causal Inference for Time-Varying Intstructional Treatments.’’ Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics33:333-62.
19.
Hubbard, A.E., J. Ahern, N.L. Fleischer, M. van der Laan, S.A. Lippman, T. Bruckner, and W.A. Satariano. Forthcoming. ‘‘To GEE or Not to GEE: Comparing Estimating Function and Likelihood-Based Methods for Estimating the Associations Between Neighborhoods and Health.’’Epidemiology .
20.
Hudgens, M.G. and M.E. Halloran.2008. ‘‘Towards Causal Inference With Interference .’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association103:832-42.
21.
Imai, K., L. Keele, and T. Yamamoto.2009. ‘‘Identification, Inference, and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects.’’ Working paper.
22.
Joffe, M., D. Small, and C-Y. Hsu.2007. ‘‘Defining and Estimating Intervention Effects for Groups That Will Develop an Auxiliary Outcome.’’Statistical Science22:74-97.
23.
Judd, C.M. and D.A. Kenny.1981. ‘‘Process Analysis: Estimating Mediation in Treatment Evaluations.’’ Evaluation Review5:602-19.
24.
Kaufman, J.S.2005. ‘‘Re: ’Appropriate Assessment of Neighborhood Effects on Individual Health: Integrating Random and Fixed Effects in Multilevel Logistic Regression.’’’ American Journal of Epidemiology162:602-03.
25.
Kaufman, J.S., R.F. MacLehose, and S. Kaufman.2004. ‘‘A Further Critique of the Analytic Strategy of Adjusting for Covariates to Identify Biologic Mediation .’’ Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations1:4.
26.
Kling, J.R., J.B. Liebman, and L.F. Katz.2007. ‘‘Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects.’’ Econometrica75:83-119.
27.
Lee, Y. and J.A. Nelder.1996. ‘‘Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models.’’Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58:619-78.
28.
Neyman, J. ( 1923). Sur les applications de la thar des probabilities aux experiences Agaricales: Essay des principle. Excerpts reprinted (1990) in English (D. Dabrowska and T. Speed, Trans.) inStatistical Science5:463-472.
29.
Pearl, J.1995. ‘‘Casual Diagrams for Empirical Research (With Discussion).’’ Biometrika82:669-710.
30.
Pearl, J.2001. ‘‘Direct and Indirect Effects.’’ Pp. 411-20 in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
31.
Peterson, M.L., S.E. Sinisi, and M. J. van der Laan .2006. ‘‘Estimation of Direct Causal Effects. Epidemiology17:276-84.
32.
Raudenbush, S.W. and R. Sampson.1999. ‘‘Assessing Direct and Indirect Effects in Multilevel Designs With Latent Variables.’’ Sociological Methods and Research28:123-53.
33.
Robins, J.M.1986. ‘‘A New Approach to Causal Inference in Mortality Studies With Sustained Exposure Period-Application to Control of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect.’’ Mathematical Modelling7:1393-1512.
34.
Robins, J.M.1987. ‘‘Addendum to a New Approach to Causal Inference in Mortality Studies With Sustained Exposure Period-Application to Control of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect.’’ Computers and Mathematics with Applications14: 923-45.
35.
Robins, J.M.1999. ‘‘Marginal Structural Models Versus Structural Nested Models as Tools for Causal Inference.’’ Pp. 95-134 in Statistical Models in Epidemiology: The Environment and Clinical Trials, edited by M. E. Halloran and D. Berry.New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
36.
Robins, J.M.2003. ‘‘Semantics of Causal DAG Models and the Identification of Direct and Indirect Effects.’’ Pp. 70-81 in Highly Structured Stochastic Systems, edited by P. Green, N. L. Hjort, and S. Richardson.New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Robins, J.M. and S. Greenland.1992. ‘‘Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects.’’ Epidemiology3:143-55.
38.
Robins, J.M., M.A. Hernán, and B. Brumback.2000. ‘‘Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology.’’ Epidemiology11:550-60.
39.
Rosenbaum, P.R.2007. ‘‘Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments.’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association102:191-200.
40.
Rubin, D.B.1974. ‘‘Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.’’ Journal Educational Psychology66:688-701.
41.
Rubin, D.B.1978. ‘‘Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization.’’ Annals of Statistics6:34-58.
42.
Rubin, D.B.2004. ‘‘Direct and Indirect Effects Via Potential Outcomes.’’ Scandinavian Journal of Statistics31:161-70.
43.
Sampson, R.J., S.W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls.1997. ‘‘Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy.’’ Science227:918-23.
44.
Sobel, M.E.1990. ‘‘Effect Analysis and Causation in Linear Structural Equation Models.’’ Psychometrika55:495-515.
45.
Sobel, M.E.2006. ‘‘What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate?: Causal Inference in the Face of Interference. ’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association101:1398-1407.
46.
Subramanian, S.V., D.J. Kim, and I. Kawachi.2002. ‘‘Social Trust and Self-Rated Health in US Communities: A Multilevel Analysis.’’ Journal of Urban Health79:S21-34.
47.
van der Laan, M.J. and M.L. Petersen.2004. ‘‘Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies.’’ UC Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 155. (http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper155 )
48.
van der Laan, M.J. and M.L. Petersen.2008. ‘‘Direct Effect Models.’’International Journal of Biostatistics4:Article 23.
49.
VanderWeele, T.J.2008a. ‘‘Ignorability and Stability Assumptions in Neighborhood Effects Research.’’ Statistics in Medicine27:1934-43.
50.
VanderWeele, T.J.2008b. ‘‘Simple Relations Between Principal Stratification and Direct and Indirect Effects.’’ Statistics and Probability Letters78:2957-62.
51.
VanderWeele, T.J.2009a. ‘‘Concerning the Consistency Assumption in Causal Inference.’’Epidemiology20:880-83.
52.
VanderWeele, T.J.2009b. ‘‘Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects.’’Epidemiology20:18-26.
53.
VanderWeele, T.J.2009c. ‘‘Mediation and Mechanism.’’European Journal of Epidemiology24:217-24.
54.
VanderWeele, T.J. and S. Vansteelandt.2009. ‘‘Conceptual Issues Concerning Mediation, Interventions and Composition.’’Statistics and Its Interface.
55.
Verbitsky, N. and S.W. Raudenbush.2009. ‘‘Causal Inference in Spatial Settings: A Case Study of Community Policing Program in Chicago.’’ Working paper.
56.
Winship, C. and S.L. Morgan.1999. ‘‘The Estimation of Causal Effects From Observational Data.’’ Annual Review of Sociology25:659-707.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
