In this note, the Cramer-Rao lower bound of variance by using the two decks of cards in randomized response sampling has been developed. The lower bound of variance has been compared with the recent estimator proposed by Odumade and Singh at equal protection of respondents. A real practical face-to-face interview data collected using two decks of cards has been analyzed and the results are discussed.
ChenC. C.SinghS.2010. “Pseudo Bayes and Pseudo Empirical Bayes Estimators Using Unrelated Question Randomized Response Sampling.” Poster presented at Frontiers of Statistical Decision Making and Bayesian Analysis, San Antonio, TX.
2.
ChristofidesT. C.2010. “Comments on a Method of Comparison of Randomized Response Techniques.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference140:574-75.
3.
GjestvangC. R.SinghS.2006. “A New Randomized Response Model.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B68:523-30.
4.
GuerrieroM.SandriM. F.2007. “A Note on the Comparison of Some Randomized Response Procedures.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference137:2184-190.
5.
OdumadeO.SinghS.2009. “Efficient Use of Two Decks of Cards in Randomized Response Sampling.” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods38:439-46.
6.
OdumadeO.SinghS.2010. “An Alternative to the Bar-Lev, Bobovitch and Boukai Randomized Response Model.” Sociological Methods & Research39:206-21.
7.
PeetersC. F. W.Lensvelt-MuldersG. J. L. M.LasthuizenK.2010. “A Note on a Simple and Practical Randomized Response Framework for Eliciting Sensitive Dichotomous and Quantitative Information.” Sociological Methods & Research39:283-96.
8.
SinghS.2010. “Proposed Optimal Orthogonal New Additive Model (POONAM).” Statistica, anno LXX, n.1:73-81.
9.
WarnerS. L.1965. “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association60:63-9.
