Using population representative survey data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and administrative pension records from the Statutory Pension Insurance, the authors compare four statistical matching techniques to complement survey information on net worth with social security wealth (SSW) information from the administrative records. The unique properties of the linked data allow for a straight control of the quality of matches under each technique. Based on various evaluation criteria, Mahalanobis distance matching performs best. Exploiting the advantages of the newly assembled data, the authors include SSW in a wealth inequality analysis. Despite its quantitative relevance, SSW is thus far omitted from such analyses because adequate micro data are lacking. The inclusion of SSW doubles the level of net worth and decreases inequality by almost 25 percent. Moreover, the results reveal striking differences along occupational lines.
AndridgeRebecca R.LittleRoderick J. A.. 2010. “A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response.”International Statistical Review78:40–64.
2.
ArceneauxKevinGerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.. 2010. “A Cautionary Note on the Use of Matching to Estimate Causal Effects: An Empirical Example Comparing Matching Estimates to an Experimental Benchmark.”Sociological Methods & Research39:256–82.
3.
BaiocchiMikeSmallDylan S.LorchScottRosenbaumPaul R.. 2010. “Building a Stronger Instrument in an Observational Study of Perinatal Care for Premature Infants.”Journal of the American Statistical Association105:1285–96.
4.
Bundesministerium für Arbeit and Soziales. 2008. “Ergänzender Bericht der Bundesregierung zum Rentenversicherungsbericht 2008 gemäß §154 Abs. 2 SGB VI.” Pp. 239.
5.
CopasJ. B.1997. “Using Regression Models for Prediction: Shrinkage and Regression to the Mean.”Statistical Methods in Medical Research6:167–83.
6.
D'OrazioMarcelloDi ZioMarcoScanuMauro. 2006. Statistical matching: Theory and practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
7.
DehejiaRajeev H.WahbaSadek. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.”Journal of the American Statistical Association94:1053–62.
8.
Deutsche Rentenversicherung. 2010. Rentenversicherung in Zeitreihen. Vol. Band 22. Berlin.
9.
ElliottMichael R.DavisWilliam W.. 2005. “Obtaining Cancer Risk Factor Prevalence Estimates in Small Areas: Combining Data from Two Surveys.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics)54:595–609.
10.
FordB. L. 1983. “An Overview of Hot-Deck Procedures.” In Incomplete Data in Sample Survey (Vol. 2), edited by MadowWilliam G.NisselsonHaroldOlkinIngramRubinDonald B.. New York: Academia Press: 185-209.
11.
FrickJoachim R.GrabkaMarkus M.MarcusJan. 2007. “Editing and Multiple Imputation of Item-Non-Response in the 2002 Wealth Module of the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).” Berlin, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW).
12.
FrickJoachim R.HeadeyBruce. 2009. “Living Standards in Retirement: Accepted International Comparisons are Misleading.”Schmollers Jahrbuch129:309–19.
13.
HeckmanJames J.IchimuraHidehikoToddPetra E.. 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.”The Review of Economic Studies64:605–54.
14.
HimmelreicherRalf K.2005. “Analysepotenzial des Scientific Use Files Versichertenrentenzugang.” Pp. 38–92. In Forschungsrelevante Daten der Rentenversicherung: Bericht vom zweiten Workshop des Forschungsdatenzentrums der Rentenversicherung (FDZ-RV) vom 27. bis 29. Juni 2005 inWürzburg. Berlin, Germany: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund.
15.
JenkinsStephen P.CappellariLorenzoLynnPeterJäckleAnnetteSalaEmanuela. 2006. “Patterns of Consent: Evidence from a General Household Survey.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)169:701–22.
16.
KadaneJoseph B. [1978] 2001. “Some Statistical Problems in Merging Data Files.”Journal of Official Statistics17:423–33.
17.
KortmannKlausHalbherrVerena. 2008. “Alterssicherung in Deutschland 2007 (ASID '07): Zusammenfassung wichtiger Ergebnisse.”147. München, Germany: TNS Infratest.
18.
LittleRoderick J. A.1988. “Missing-Data Adjustments in Large Surveys.”Journal of Business & Economic Statistics6:287–96.
19.
LooseBrigitteFrommertDina. 2009. “Verstetigung in der Alterssicherung durch Integration ungesicherter Selbständigkeit in die gesetzliche Rentenversicherung.”Deutsche Rentenversicherung64:501–17.
20.
MahalanobisPrasanta C.1936. “On the Generalized Distance in Statistics.”Proceeding of the National Institute of Sciences of India2:49–55.
21.
MastersonThomas. 2010. “Quality of Match for Statistical Matches Used in the 1992 and 2007 LIMEW Estimates for the United States.”32. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute.
22.
ModiglianiFranco. 1988. “The Role of Intergenerational Transfers and Life Cycle Saving in the Accumulation of Wealth.”The Journal of Economic Perspectives2:15–40.
23.
MorganStephen L.HardingDavid J.. 2006. “Matching Estimators of Causal Effects—Prospects and Pitfalls in Theory and Practice.”Sociological Methods & Research35:3–60.
24.
MoriarityChrisScheurenFritz. 2001. “Statistical Matching: A Paradigm for Assessing the Uncertainty in the Procedure.”Journal of Official Statistics17:407–22.
25.
OrlowskiRobertRiphahnRegina T.. 2009. “The East German Wage Structure after Transition.”Economics of Transition17:629–59.
26.
RasnerAnikaFrickJoachim R.GrabkaMarkus M.. 2011. “Extending the Empirical Basis for Wealth Inequality Research Using Statistical Matching of Administrative and Survey Data.”SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. 359. Berlin, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
27.
RässlerSusanne. 2002. Statistical Matching: A Frequentist Theory, Practical Applications, and Alternative Bayesian Approaches. New York: Springer.
28.
RässlerSusanneKieslHans. 2006. “Quality in Data Fusion.”Proceedings of Q2006 European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics. Cardiff, UK.
29.
RodgersWillard L.1984. “An Evaluation of Statistical Matching.”Journal of Business & Economic Statistics2:91–102.
30.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.”Biometrika70:41–55.
31.
RubinDonald B.1986. “Statistical Matching Using File Concatenation with Adjusted Weights and Multiple Imputations.”Journal of Business & Economic Statistics4:87–94.
32.
RubinDonald B.1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley.
33.
SchaferJoseph L.1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
34.
SeitzHelmut. 2003. “Die Leistungen der neuen Länder im Rahmen des AAÜG—Bestimmungsgründe und Belastungsdynamik—Gutachten im Auftrag der Länder Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Thüringen.”
35.
WagnerGert G.FrickJoachim R.SchuppJürgen. 2007. “The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements.”Schmollers Jahrbuch127:139–69.
