This article deals with a model for describing a sequence of events, for example, education is typically attained by a set of transitions from one level of education to the next. In particular, this article tries to reconcile measures describing the effect of a variable on each of these transitions, with measures describing the effect of this variable on the final outcome of that process. Such a relationship has been known to exist within a sequential logit model, but it has hardly been used in empirical research mainly because of an absence of a practical way of giving it a substantive interpretation. This article tries to provide such an interpretation by showing that the effect on the final outcome is a weighted sum of the effects on each transition, such that a transition gets more weight if more people are at risk of passing that transition, passing the transition is more differentiating, and people gain more from passing.
AgrestiA.2002. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
2.
AllisonP. D.1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups.” Sociological Methods & Research28:186–208.
3.
BallarinoG.BernardiF.RequenaM.SchadeeH.. 2009. “Persistent Inequalities? Expansion of Education and Class Inequality in Italy and Spain.” European Sociological Review25:123–38.
4.
BallarinoG.PanichellaN.TriventiM.. 2014. “School Expansion and Uneven Modernization. Comparing Educational Inequality in Northern and Southern Italy.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility36:69–86.
5.
BallarinoG.SchadeeH.. 2010. “Allocation and Distribution: A Discussion of the Educational Transition Model, with Reference to the Italian Case.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility28:45–58.
6.
BreenR.JonssonJ. O.. 2000. “Analyzing Educational Careers: A Multinomial Transition Model.” American Sociological Review65:754–72.
7.
BreenR.JonssonJ. O.. 2005. “Inequality of Opportunity in Comparative Perspective: Recent Research on Educational and Social Mobility.” Annual Review of Sociology31:223–43.
8.
BuisM. L.2010. “Inequality of Educational Outcome and Inequality of Educational Opportunity in the Netherlands during the 20th Century.” PhD thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU-University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
9.
BuisM. L.2011. “The Consequences of Unobserved Heterogeneity in a Sequential Logit Model.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility29:247–62.
10.
BuisM. L.In press. “Lange-termijn trends in onderwijsuitkomsten in nederland.” In Een kloof van alle tijden. Verschillen tussen lager en hoger opgeleiden in werk, cultuur en politiek, Chapter 9, edited byvan der WerfhorstH.GanzeboomH. B. G.. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
11.
BuisM. L.MönkediekB.HillmertS.. 2012. “Educational Expansion and the Role of Demographic Factors: The Case of West Germany.” Population Review51:1–15.
12.
CameronS. V.HeckmanJ. J.. 1998. “Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts of American Males.” The Journal of Political Economy106:262–333.
13.
ColeS. R.AnanthC. V.. 2001. “Regression Models for Unconstrained, Partially or Fully Constrained Continuation Odds Ratios.” International Journal of Epidemiology30:1379–82.
14.
FienbergS. E.1977. The Analyses of Cross-classified Categorical Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
FoxJ.1997. Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
GanzeboomH. B.TreimanD. J.. 2003. “Three Internationally Standardised Measures for Comparative Research on Occupational Status.” Pp. 159-93 in Advances in Cross-National Comparison: A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-economic Variables, Chapter 9, edited byHoffmeyer-ZlotnikJ. H.WolfC.. . New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
HoogendoornA.DaalmansJ.. 2009. “Nonresponse in the Recruitment of an Internet Panel Based on Probability Sampling.” Survey Research Methods3:59–72.
20.
HoutM.DiPreteT. A.. 2006. “What We Have Learned: RC 28’s Contributions to Knowledge about Social Stratification.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24:1–20.
21.
KoruppS. E.GanzeboomH. B.Van Der LippeT.. 2002. “Do Mothers Matter? A Comparison of Models of the Influence of Mothers’ and Fathers’ Educational and Occupational Status on Children’s Educational Attainment.” Quality and Quantity36:17–42.
22.
LongJ. S.1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
LucasS. R.2001. “Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects.” American Journal of Sociology106:1642–90.
24.
MacLeanA.2011. “The Stratification of Military Service and Combat Exposure, 1934–1994.” Social Science Research40:336–48.
25.
MaddalaG. S.1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MareR. D.1977. “Growth and Distribution of Schooling in White Male American Cohorts: 1907–1952.” PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
27.
MareR. D.1980. “Social Background and School Continuation Decisions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association75:295–305.
28.
MareR. D.1981. “Change and Stability in Educational Stratification.” American Sociological Review46:72–87.
29.
MareR. D.2006. “Response: Statistical Models of Educational Stratification—Hauser and Andrew’s Models for School Transitions.” Sociological Methodology36:27–37.
30.
MareR. D.2011. “Introduction to Symposium on Unmeasured Heterogeneity in School Transition Models.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility29:239–45.
31.
MarksG. N.2004. “The Measurement of Socio-economic Inequalities in Education: A Further Comment.” Acta Sociologica47:91–93.
32.
MoodC.2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about it.” European Sociological Review26:67–82.
33.
NeuhausJ. M.JewellN. P.. 1993. “A Geometric Approach to Assess Bias Due to Omitted Covariates in Generalized Linear Models.” Biometrika80:807–15.
34.
NewsonR. B.2012. “Sensible Parameters for Univariate and Multivariate Splines.” Stata Journal12:479–504.
35.
NieuwbeertaP.RijkenS.. 1996. “Educational Expansion and Educational Reproduction in Eastern Europe, 1940–1979.” Czech Sociological Review4:187–210.
36.
SchröderH.GanzeboomH. B. G.. 2014. “Measuring and Modelling Level of Education in European Societies.” European Sociological Review30:119–36.
SmithH. L.CheungP. P.. 1986. “Trends in the Effects of Family Background on Educational Attainment in the Philippines.” The American Journal of Sociology91:1387–408.
39.
WilliamsR.2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups.” Sociological Methods & Research37:531–59.
40.
XieY.2011. “Values and Limitations of Statistical Models.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility29:343–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
