Qualitative coding procedures emanating from grounded theory were limited by technologies of the 1960s: colored pens, scissors, and index cards. Today, electronic documents can be flexibly stored, retrieved, and cross-referenced using qualitative data analysis (QDA) software. We argue the oft-cited grounded theory framework poorly fits many features of contemporary sociological interview studies, including large samples, coding by teams, and mixed-method analysis. The grounded theory approach also hampers transparency and does not facilitate reanalysis or secondary analysis of interview data. We begin by summarizing grounded theory’s assumptions about coding and analysis. We then analyze published articles from American Sociological Association flagship journals, demonstrating that current conventions for semistructured interview studies depart from the grounded theory framework. Based on experience analyzing interview data, we suggest steps in data organization and analysis to better utilize QDA technology. Our goal is to support rigorous, transparent, and flexible analysis of in-depth interview data. We end by discussing strengths and limitations of our twenty-first-century approach.
AsadAsad L.2015. “Contexts of Reception, Post-disaster Migration, and Socioeconomic Mobility.” Population and Environment36(3):279–310.
2.
BailChristopher A.2016. Terrified: How Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BakerSarah ElsieEdwardsRosalind. 2012. “How Many Qualitative Interviews Is Enough? Expert Voices and Early Career Reflections on Sampling and Cases in Qualitative Research.” National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, Economic and Social Research Council, Southampton, England. Retrieved September 13, 2018 (http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/11632/1/how_many_interviews.pdf).
4.
BazeleyPatriciaJacksonKristi. 2013. Qualitative Analysis with NVivo. London, England: Sage.
5.
BleeKathleen. 2009. “Defining and Communicating Standards for Qualitative Research Rigor in Sociology.” Pp. 148–52 in Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research, edited by LamontM.WhiteP.. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
6.
BosickStacy. 2015. “Pushed Out on My Own: The Impact of Hurricane Katrina in the Lives of Emerging Adults.” Sociological Perspectives58(2):243–63.
7.
BrownHana E.2013. “Racialized Conflict and Policy Spillover Effects: The Role of Race in the Contemporary U.S. Welfare State”. American Journal of Sociology119(2):394–443.
8.
BryantAntony. 2002. “Regrounding Grounded Theory.” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application4(1):25–42.
9.
BryantAntonyCharmazKathy. 2007. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London, England: Sage.
10.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2011. “‘I Need Help!’ Social Class and Children’s Help-seeking in Elementary School.” American Sociological Review76(6):862–82.
11.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2014a. “Coached for the Classroom: Parents’ Cultural Transmission and Children’s Reproduction of Educational Inequalities.” American Sociological Review79(5):1015–37.
12.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2014b. “The Inconsistent Curriculum: Cultural Tool-kits and Student Interpretations of Ambiguous Expectations.” Social Psychology Quarterly76(2):186–209.
13.
CampbellJohn L.QuincyCharlesOssermanJordanPedersenOve K.. 2013. “Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement.” Sociological Methods & Research42(3):294–320.
14.
ChakrabartiParijatFryeMargaret. 2017. “A Mixed-methods Framework for Analyzing Text Data: Integrating Computational Techniques with Qualitative Methods in Demography.” Demographic Research37:1351–82.
15.
CharmazKathy. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” Pp. 509–35 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S., 2nded. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CollettJessica L.VercelKelcieBoykinOlevia. 2015. “Using Identity Processes to Understand Persistent Inequality in Parenting.” Social Psychology Quarterly78(4):345–364.
19.
DeterdingNicole M.2015a. “Instrumental and Expressive Education: College Planning in the Face of Poverty.” Sociology of Education88(4):284–301.
20.
DeterdingNicole M.2015b. “Start, Start Again: The College Pathways of Economically-vulnerable Mothers.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/17463981. Accessed 20 September 2018.
21.
GlaserBarney G.1992. Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
22.
GlaserBarney G.1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
23.
GlaserBarney G.2005. The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description’s Remodeling of Grounded Theory Methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
24.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
25.
GuestGregBunceArwenJohnsonLaura. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods18(1):59–82.
26.
JerolmackColinKhanShamus. 2014. “Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy.” Sociological Methods & Research43(2):178–209.
27.
KasinitzPhilipMollenkopfJohn H.HoldawayJenniferWatersMary C.. 2008. Inheriting the City: The Children of Immigrants Come of Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
KatzJack. 1982. Poor People’s Lawyers in Transition. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
29.
LamontMicheleWhitePatricia. 2009. Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research(Final Report). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
30.
LewinsAnnSilverChristina. 2007. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-step Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
31.
LoweSarah R.LustigKaraMarrowHelen B.. 2011. “African American Women’s Reports of Racism during Hurricane Katrina: Variation by Interviewer Race.” New School Psychology Bulletin8(2):46–57.
32.
LoweSarah R.RhodesJean E.ScoglioArielle A. J.. 2012. “Changes in Marital and Partner Relationships in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.” Psychology of Women Quarterly36(3):286–300.
33.
LoweSarah R.RhodesJean E.WatersMary C.. 2015. “Understanding Resilience and Other Trajectories of Psychological Distress: A Mixed-methods Study of Low-income Mothers Who Survived Hurricane Katrina.” Current Psychology34(3):537–50.
34.
LukerKristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
MaxwellJoseph. 1992. “Understanding Validity in Qualitative Research.” Harvard Educational Review62(3):279–301.
MorrisKatherine AnnDeterdingNicole M.. 2016. “The Emotional Cost of Distance: Geographic Social Network Dispersion and Post-traumatic Stress in Survivors of Hurricane Katrina.” Social Science and Medicine165(1):56–65.
38.
PriceHeatherSmithChristian. 2017, August. “Process and Reliability for Cultural Model Analysis Using Semi-structured Interviews.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association,Montreal, Québec, Canada.
39.
RaginCharlesNagelJoaneWhitePatricia. 2004. “Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research
.” NSF Report 04-219, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
40.
SmallMario L.2011. “How to Conduct a Mixed-methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature.” Annual Review of Sociology37(1):57–86.
41.
SilbeySusan. 2009. “In Search of Social Science.” Pp. 76–82 in Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research, edited by LamontM.WhiteP.. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
42.
StraussAnselm L.1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
StraussAnselm L.CorbinJuliet M.. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London, England: Sage.
44.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory30(3):167–86.
45.
TolletteJessica. 2013. “Nueva New Orleans: Race Relations and (Im)migration in the Post-Katrina South.” Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.
46.
WacquantLoïc. 2002. “Scrutinizing the Street: Poverty, Morality, and the Pitfalls of Urban Ethnography.” American Journal of Sociology107(6):1468–532.
47.
WatersMary C.1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
WatersMary C.1999. Black Identities: West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
WatersMary C.2016. “Life after Hurricane Katrina: The Resilience in Survivors of Katrina (RISK) Project.” Sociological Forum31:750–69.
50.
WatersMary C.CarrPatrick J.KefalasMaria J.Ann HoldawayJennifer. 2011. Coming of Age in America: The Transition to Adulthood in the Twenty-first Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
WeissRobert S.1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.
52.
WeitzmanEben A.MilesMatthew B.. 1995. Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis: A Software Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
WhiteMichael J.JuddMaya D.PoliandriSimone. 2012. “Illumination with a Dim Bulb? What Do Social Scientists Learn by Employing Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) in the Service of Multi-method Designs?” Sociological Methodology42(1):43–76.
54.
ZnanieckiFlorian. 1934. The Method of Sociology. New York: Farrar and Strauss.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
