This article aims to clarify fundamental aspects of the process of assigning fuzzy scores to conditions based on family resemblance (FR) structures by considering prototype and set theories. Prototype theory and set theory consider FR structures from two different angles. Specifically, set theory links the conceptualization of FR to the idea of sufficient and INUS (Insufficient but Necessary part of a condition, which is itself Unnecessary but Sufficient for the result) sets. In contrast, concept membership in prototype theory is strictly linked to the notion of similarity (or resemblance) in relation to the prototype, which is the anchor of the ideational content of the concept. After an introductive section where I elucidate set-theoretic and prototypical aspects of concept formation, I individuate the axiomatic properties that identify the principles of transforming FR structures into fuzzy sets. Finally, I propose an algorithm based on the power mean that is able to operationalize FR structures considering both set-theoretic and prototype theory perspectives.
BarrenecheaRodrigoCastilloIsabel. 2018. “The Many Roads to Rome: Family Resemblance Concepts in the Social Sciences.” Quality & Quantity. 53:107–30.
2.
BasurtoXavierSpeerJohanna. 2012. “Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)” Field Methods24(2):155–74.
3.
BaumgartnerMichaelAmbühlMathias. 2018. “Causal Modeling with Multiple-values and Fuzzy-sets Coincidence Analysis.” Political Research and Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.45.
4.
BeachDerekPedersenRasmus. 2013. Process Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BelohlavekRadimKlirGeorgeHaroldLewis W.WayEileen. 2002. “On the Capability of Fuzzy Set Theory to Represent Concepts.” International Journal of General System31(6):569–85.
6.
BlatterJoachimHaverlandMarkus. 2012. Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
7.
CollierDavidMahonJames E.Jr. 1993. “Conceptual Stretching Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review87(4):845–55.
8.
De BlockDeboraVisBarbara. 2018. “Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research13(4):503–35.
9.
DuboisDidierPradeHenri. 1980. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. New York: Academic Press.
10.
DuboisDidierPradeHenri. 2000. Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets. New York: Springer.
11.
DyckhoffHaraldPedryczWitold. 1983. “Generalized Means as Model of Compensative Connectives.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems14:143–54.
12.
FuhrmannGy. 1991. “Note on the Integration of Prototype Theory and Fuzzy-set Theory.” Synthese86(1):1–27.
13.
GerringJohnBarresiPaul A.. 2003. “Putting Ordinary Language to Work: A Min-Max Strategy of Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Theoretical Politics15(2):201–32.
14.
GoertzGary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
HamptonJamesJönssonMartin L.. 2012. “Typicality and Composition a Lity: The Logic of Combining Vague Concepts.”
Oxford Handbooks Online. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0018
17.
HongWon-SinChenShi-JayWangLi-HuiChenShui-Ming. 2007. “A New Approach for Fuzzy Information Retrieval based on Weighted Power-mean Averaging Operators.” Computers and Mathematics with Applications53:1800–1819.
18.
Johnson-LairdPhilip. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
KampHansParteeBarbara. 1995. “Prototype Theory and Compositionality.” Cognition57: 129–91.
20.
KayaIhsanColakMuratTerziFulya. 2019. “A Comprehensive Review of Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodologies for Energy Policy Making.” Energy Strategy Reviews. 24: 207–28.
21.
LakoffGeorge. 1982. Categories: An Essay in Cognitive Linguistic. Seoul, South Korea: Hanshin.
22.
LakoffGeorge. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
LakoffGeorge. 2014. “Set Theory and Fuzzy Sets: Their Relationship to Natural Language.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research Newsletter, 12(1):9–14.
24.
MackieJohn L.1974. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
MedinDouglas L. 1989. “Concepts and Conceptual Structure.” American Psychologist44(12):1469:81.
26.
MendelJerryWuDongrui. 2010. Perceptual Computing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
MikkelsenKim Sass. 2015. “Fuzzy-set Case Studies.” Sociological Methods & Research46(3):422–55.
28.
MikkelsenKim Sass. 2017. ‘‘Negative Case Selection: Justifications and Consequences for QCA-based MMR.’’ Sociological Methods & Research46(4):739–77.
29.
Mikelsen2017, Rohlfing and Schneider 2013, 2018, Schneider and Rohlfing 2013.
30.
MurphyGregory L.2004. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31.
OshersonDaniel N.SmithEdward E.. 1981. “On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as a Theory of Concepts.” Cognition9:35–58.
32.
QuarantaMario. 2013. “Fuzzy-set Theory and Concepts: A Proposal for Concept Formation and Operationalization.” Comparative Sociology12(6):785–820.
33.
RaginCharlesBox-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD.. 2007. “Fuzzy Sets: Calibration versus Measurement,” The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology2007:174-98. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
RaginCharles. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
RickardJohn T.AisbettJanetYagerRonald R.. 2015. “A New Fuzzy Cognitive Map Structure based on the Weighted Power Mean.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems23(6):2188–201.
36.
RickardJohn T.AisbettJanetYagerRonald R.GibbonGreg. 2011. “Linguistic Weighted Power Means.” IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 27-30 June, Taipei, Taiwan.
37.
RickardJohn T.AisbettJanetYagerRonald R.GibbonGreg. 2013. Computing with Words using Weighted Power Mean Aggregation Operators. Soft Computing: State of the Art Theory and Novel Applications. New York: Springer Verlag.
38.
RohlfingIngoSchneiderCarsten Q.. 2013. “Improving Research on Necessary Conditions: Formalized Case Selection for Process Tracing after QCA.” Political Research Quarterly66:220–35.
39.
RohflingIngoSchneiderCarsten Q.. 2018. “A Unifying Framework for Causal Analysis in Set-theoretic Multimethod Research.” Sociological Methods & Research47(1):37–63.
RoschEleanor. 1999. “Reclaiming Concepts.” The Journal of Consciousness Studies6(11-12):61–77.
42.
RoschEleanorMervisCarolyn B.. 1975. “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories.” Cognitive Psychology7:573–605.
43.
RothEmilieMervisCarolyn B.. 1983. “Fuzzy Set Theory and Class Inclusion Relations in Semantic Categories.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior22(5):509–25.
44.
SchneiderCarsten Q.RohlfingIngo. 2013. ‘‘Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-theoretic Multi-method Research.’’ Sociological Methods & Research42:559–97.
45.
SkocpolTheda. 1979. States & Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
46.
SmithEdward E.MedinDouglas L.. 1981. Concepts and Categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
SmithsonMichael. 2016. “Fuzzy and Fuzzy Logic in Human Sciences.” Pp. 175–86 in Fuzzy Logic in its 50th Year, edited by KahramanCengizYaziciAdnanKaymakUzay. Heidelberg: Springer.
48.
SmithsonMichaelOdenGregg C.. 1999. “Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications in Psychology.” in Practical Applications of Fuzzy Technologies. The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Vol. 6, edited by JurgenZimmermann Hans. Boston, MA: Springer.
49.
SmithsonMichaelVerkuilenJay. 2006. Fuzzy Set Theory: Application in the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
50.
TothZsofiaHennebergStephan C.NaudePeter. 2017 “Addressing the Qualitative in Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Generic Membership Evaluation Template” Industrial Marketing Management63:192–204.
51.
TreubBettina. 2013. “Integrating qualitative and quantitative data: index creation using fuzzy-set QCA.” Quality and Quantity47:3537–558. doi: 10.1007/s11135-012-9738-8
52.
TverskyAmos. 1977. “Features of Similarity.’ Psychological Review84(7):327–52.
53.
TverskyAmosGatiItamar. 1978. “Studies of Similarity.” Pp. 79–89in Cognition and Categorization, edited by RoschE.LloyedB.B.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
ZadehLofti. 1982. “A Note on Prototype Theory and Fuzzy Sets.” Cognition12:291–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
