Previous theory and research in the area of large-scale organizations have suggested that there is a relationship between the organizational chart and social behavior within the organization. The prime concern of this study was to determine the degree of relationship between the formal system's chart and communication within the organization. In order to examine this supposition two statistical models were developed: (1) dealing with the organizational chart of relations, and (2) dealing with random behavior. While our findings indicate that observed interaction differs significantly from that predicted on the basis of the organization chart, there is clear evidence indicating the superiority of the organizational chart as a basis of prediction over the use of a random model of behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R.F. (1955a) "The equilibrium problem in small groups," pp. 449-490 in A. P. Hare et al. (eds.) Small Groups: Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
--- ( 1950) Interaction Process Analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Blau, P.M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
5.
--- and W.R. Scott (1962) Formal Organizations. San Francisco : Chandler.
6.
Burgess, R.L. (1968) "Communication networks: an experimental re-evaluation . J. of Experimental Social Psychology4 (July): 324-337.
7.
Coleman, J.S. (1960) "The mathematical study of small groups," pp. 7-149 in H. Solomon (ed.) Mathematical Thinking in the Measurement of Behavior. New York: Free Press.
8.
Eilon, S. (1968) "Taxonomy of communications." Admin. Sci. Q.13 (September): 266-288.
9.
Etzioni, A. (1961) A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations . New York: Free Press.
10.
Golembiewski, R.T. (1965) "Small groups and large organizations," pp. 87-141 in J. G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
11.
Guetzkow, H. (1965) "Communications in organizations," pp. 534-573 in J. G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
Katz, D. and R. Kahn (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
13.
March, J.G. and H.A. Simon (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
14.
Moore, W.E. (1962) The Conduct of the Corporation. New York: Random House.
15.
Richardson, J.T., B.H. Mayhew, Jr., and L.N. Gray (1969) "Differentiation, restraint, and the asymmetry of power." Human Relations22 (June): 263-274.
16.
Scott, W.R. (1964) "Theory of organizations," pp. 485-529 in R.E.L. Faris (ed.) Handbook of Modem Sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally .
17.
Simpson, R.L. (1959) "Vertical and horizontal communication in formal organizations." Admin. Sci. Q.4 (September): 188-196.
18.
Weber, M. (1967) "The ideal bureaucracy," pp. 86-90 in G. D. Bell (ed.) Organizations and Human Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Weinshall, T.D. (1966) "The commicogram," pp. 619-633 in J. R. Lawrence (ed.) Operational Research and the Social Sciences. New York: Tavistock.
