This study established the internal consistency of the SDO6 scale as a measure of Social Dominance Orientation in South Africa. The reliability was determined for its original English version and for newly developed Afrikaans and isiXhosa forms. Reliabilities were determined for various demographic sub-groups. The English and Afrikaans forms showed high internal consistencies throughout, which were comparable to those found in other societies. The isiXhosa version of the scale had low internal consistencies, except for participants who had completed their schooling. Deleting three items from the isiXhosa scale improved its reliability for high school students to an adequate level. It is suggested that future research establishes the scales' validity in the South African context.
AosvedA.C.LongP.J.VollerE.K. (2009). Measuring sexism, racism, sexual prejudice, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance: The intolerant schema measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2321–2354
2.
AquinoK.S.StewartM.M.ReedA.II (2005). How social dominance orientation and job status influence perceptions of African-American affirmative action beneficiaries. Personnel Psychology, 58, 703–744
3.
BourhisY.DayanJ. (2004). Acculturation orientations towards Israeli Arabs and Jewish immigrants in Israel. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 118–131
4.
CärdenasM.MezaP.LaguesK.YanezS. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la escala de orientación a la dominancia social (SDO) en una muestra Chilena. Universitas Psychologica, 9, 161–168
5.
CaricatiL. (2007). The relationship between social dominance orientation and gender: The mediating role of social values. Sex Roles, 57, 159–171
6.
CohrsJ.C.KielmannS.MaesJ.MoschnerB. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 263–276
7.
CohrsJ.C.MaesJ.MoschnerB.KielmanS. (2007). Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Political Psychology, 28, 441–469
8.
CohrsJ.C.MoschnerB.MaesJ.KielmannS. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434
9.
CostelloK.HodsonG. (2009). Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal-human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 3–22
10.
CozzolineP.SnyderM. (2008). Good times, bad times: How personal disadvantage moderates the relationship between social dominance and efforts to win. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1420–1433
11.
CrowsonH.M. (2007). Authoritarianism, perceived threat, and human rights attitudes in U.S. law students: A brief look. Individual Differences Research, 5, 260–266
12.
CrowsonH.M. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: As mediators of worldview beliefs on attitudes related to the war on terror. Social Psychology, 40, 93–103
13.
CrowsonH.M.DeBackerT.K.ThomaS.J. (2005). Does authoritarianism predict post-9/11 attitudes?. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1273–1283
14.
DambrunM.DuarteS.GuimondS. (2004). Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 287–297
15.
DambrunM.KamiejskiR.HaddadiN.DuarteS. (2009). Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of “geneticism”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 88–100
16.
DansoD.H.EssesV. (2001). Black experimenters and the intellectual test performance of white participants: The tables are turned. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 158–165
17.
DansoH.A.SedlovskayaA.SuandaS.H. (2007). Perceptions of immigrants: Modifying the attitudes of individuals higher in social dominance orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1113–1123
18.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113
19.
DuckittJ.WagnerC.du PlessisI.BirumI. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93
20.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.GyljeM.ZakrissonI. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism?. European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482
21.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.Yang-WallentinF. (2009). Ethnic prejudice: A combined personality and social psychology model. Individual Differences Research, 7, 255–264
22.
FedericoC.M. (1999). The interactive effects of social dominance orientation, group status, and perceived stability on favoritism for high-status groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 119–143
23.
FedericoC.M.HuntC.V.ErgunD. (2009). Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: Translating “competitive jungles” and “dangerous worlds” into ideological reality. Social Justice Research, 22, 259–279
24.
FinchilescuG.TredouxC. (2010). The changing landscape of intergroup relations in South Africa. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 223–236
25.
GreenE.G.T.ThomsenL.SidaniusJ.StaerkléC.PotaninaP. (2009). Reactions to crime as a hierarchy regulating strategy: The moderating role of social dominance orientation. Social Justice Research, 22, 416–436
26.
HaleyH.SidaniusJ. (2006). The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 656–668
27.
HardyS.A.BhattacharjeeA.ReedA.IIAquinoK. (2010). Moral identity and psychological distance: The case of adolescent parental socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 111–123
28.
HeavenP.C.GreeneR.L.StonesC.R.CaputiP. (2000). Levels of social dominance orientation in three societies. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 530–532
29.
HeavenP.C.OrganL.-A.SupavadeeprasitS.LeesonP. (2006). War and prejudice: A study of social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation. Personality & Individual Differences, 40, 599–608
30.
HodsonG. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351
31.
HodsonG.HoggS.M.MacInnisC.C. (2009). The role of ‘dark personalities’ (narcissism, MacHiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690
32.
JacksonL.E.GaertnerL. (2010). Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their differential use by right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in support of war. Aggressive Behaviour, 36, 238–250
33.
KahnK.HoA.K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591–604
34.
KemmelmeierM. (2005). The effects of race and social dominance orientation in simulated juror decision. making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1030–1045
35.
LahamS.M.TarnT.LalljeeM.HewstoneM.VociA. (2010). Respect for persons in the intergroup context: Self-other overlap and intergroup emotions as mediators of the impact of respect on action tendencies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 301–317
36.
LalljeeM.TamT.HewstoneM.LahamS.LeeJ. (2009). Unconditional respect for persons and the prediction of intergroup action tendencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 666–683
37.
LeeI.-C.PrattoF.LiM.-C. (2003). SDO and sexist ideologies in Taiwan and the US. Paper presented at the 2003 Society of Political Psychology meeting, Boston, MA
38.
LeeK.AshtonM.C.OgunfoworaB.BourdageJ.S.ShinK-H. (2009). The personality bases of socio-political attitudes: The role of honesty-humility and openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 115–119
39.
LehmillerJ.J.SchmittM.T. (2007). Group domination and inequality in context: Evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 704–724
40.
LevinS.SidaniusJ. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation?. Political Psychology, 20, 99–126
41.
LiuJ.H.HuangL-L.McFedriesC. (2008). Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in social dominance orientation and right wing authoritarianism as a function of political power and societal change. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 116–126
42.
MataJ.GhavamiN.WittigM.A. (2010). Understanding gender differences in early adolescents' sexual prejudice. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 50–75
43.
MorrisonK.R.YbarraO. (2008). The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 156–163
44.
MorrisonK.R.YbarraO. (2009). Symbolic threat and social dominance among liberals and conservatives: SDO reflects conformity to political values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1039–1052
45.
NewheiserA-K.TauschN.DovidioJ.F.HewstoneM. (2009). Entitativity and prejudice: Examining their relationship and the moderating effect of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 920–926
46.
NicolA.A.M. (2009). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and their relation with leadership styles. Personality & Individual Differences, 47, 657–661
47.
PoteatV.P.SpaniermanL.B. (2010). Do the ideological beliefs of peers predict the prejudiced attitudes of other individuals in the group?. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 495–514
48.
PrattoF. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 191–263
49.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL.MalleB.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763
50.
PrattoF.LiuJ.H.LevinS.ShihM.BachrachH.HegartyP. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409
51.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320
52.
PrattoF.StallworthL.M.SidaniusJ.SiersB. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37–53
53.
RabinowitzJ.L. (1999). Go with the flow or fight the power? The interactive effect of social dominance orientation and perceived injustice on support for the status quo. Political Psychology, 20, 1–24
54.
RetiefA. (1988). Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
55.
ReynoldsK.J.TurnerJ.C.HaslamS.A.RyanM.K.BizumicB.SubasicE. (2007). Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 517–539
56.
SchmittM.T.WirthJ.H. (2009). Evidence that gender differences in social dominance orientation result from gendered self-stereotyping and group-interested responses to patriarchy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 429–436
57.
SibleyC.G.LiuJ.H. (2004). Attitudes towards biculturalism in New Zealand: Social dominance and Pakeha attitudes towards the general principles and resource-specific aspects of bicultural policy. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33, 88–99
58.
SibleyC.RobertsonA.WilsonM.S. (2006). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects. Political Psychology, 27, 75–768
59.
SibleyC.WilsonM.S.RobertsonA. (2007). Differentiating the motivations and justifications underlying individual differences in Pakeha opposition to bicultural policy: Replication and extension of a predictive model. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36, 25–33
60.
SidaniusJ. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In IyengarS.McGuireW.J. (Eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 183–219). London: Duke University Press
61.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.LiuJ.PrattoF. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67
62.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression.New York: Cambridge University Press
63.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.RabinowitzJ. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry. A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194–216
64.
SnellmanA.EkehammarB.AkramiN. (2009). The role of gender identification in social dominance orientation: Mediating or moderating the effect of sex?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 999–1012
65.
Statistics South Africa (2003). Census 2001. Census in Brief. Report No. 03–02.03 (2001)
66.
SteeleG.EdwardsD.J.A. (2008). Development and validation of the isiXhosa translations of the Beck inventories: 2. item analysis and internal consistency. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18, 217–226
67.
StrubeM.J.RahimiA.M. (2006). “Everybody knows it's true”: Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism moderate false consensus for stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 40,1038–1053
68.
ThomsenL.GreenE.G.T.SidaniusJ. (2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1455–1464
69.
UmphressE.SimmonsA.BoswellW.del Carmen TrianaM. (2008). Managing discrimination in selection: The influence of directives from an authority and social dominance orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 982–993
70.
WhitleyB.E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134
71.
WilsonM.S.LiuJ.H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187–198
