Methamphetamine (or “meth”), a central nervous system stimulant, has been constructed as a dangerous drug with certain and extreme consequences. Incomplete and sometimes inaccurate portrayals, while aimed at preventing the initiation of use, stigmatize those who do use. Using data from in-depth, qualitative interviews with eight Northern Colorado women who are active meth users, this article explores how female meth users navigate this stigma through negotiation of group membership and management of information. The women in this study internalize and challenge the stigma: They identify as meth users and addicts yet view their own practices as distinguishing them from other users; and, they carefully control the extent to which they tell others of their use, even when contradictory to their sense of self and desirable relationships. These findings support the need for increased recognition and further examination of the role and enactment of agency among drug users and other oppressed groups.
AndersonD. (2010). Does information matter? The effect of the Meth Project on meth use among youth. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 732–742.
2.
ArmstrongE. G. (2007). Moral panic over meth. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 10(4), 427–442.
3.
AyresT. C., & JewkesY. (2012). The haunting spectacle of crystal meth: A media-created mythology?Crime, Media, Culture, 8, 315–330.
4.
BaileyL. (2005). Control and desire: The issue of identity in popular discourses of addiction. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(6), 535–543.
5.
BoeriM. (2013). Women on ice: Methamphetamine use among suburban women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
BoeriM.HarbryL., & GibsonD. (2009). A qualitative exploration of trajectories among suburban users of methamphetamine. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 3(3), 139–151.
7.
BoeriM.TyndallB. D., & WoodallD. (2011). Suburban poverty: Barriers to services and injury prevention among marginalized women who use methamphetamine. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, XII(3), 284–292.
8.
BoshearsP.BoeriM., & HarbryL. (2011). Addiction and sociality: Perspectives from methamphetamine users in suburban USA. Addiction Research & Theory, 19(4), 289–301.
9.
BourdieuP. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris: Seuil.
10.
BourgoisP.PrinceB., & MossA. (2004). The everyday violence of Hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco. Human Organization, 63(3), 253–264.
11.
BoydS., & CarterC. I. (2010). Methamphetamine discourse: Media, law and policy. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35, 219–237.
12.
BrechtM.-L.O'BrienA.von MayrhauserC., & AnglinM. D. (2004). Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 89–106.
13.
BrownR. A. (2010). Crystal methamphetamine use among American Indian and White youth in Appalachia: Social context, masculinity, and desistance. Addiction Research & Theory, 18(3), 250–269.
14.
BuchananD. R., & WallackL. (1998). This is the partnership for a drug-free America: Any questions?Journal of Drug Issues, 28(2), 329–356.
15.
BuchananJ. (2004). Missing links? Problem drug use and social exclusion. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice, 5(4), 387–397.
16.
BuchananJ., & YoungL. (2000). The War on Drugs—A war on drug users?Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7(4), 409–422.
17.
ChouvyP.-A., & MeissonnierJ. (2004). Yaa Baa: Production, Traffic, and Consumption of Methamphetamine in Mainland Southeast Asia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
18.
CohenS. (2002). Folk Devils and Moral Panics (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Dickson-GomezJ. (2010). Can drug users be effective change agents? Yes, but much still needs to change. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 154–160.
24.
Erceg-HurnD. M. (2008). Drugs, money, and graphic ads: A critical review of the Montana Meth Project. Prevention Science, 9, 256–263.
25.
EsterbergK. G. (2002). Making sense of data Qualitative Methods in Social Research.New York: McGraw Hill.
26.
FlavinJ., & PaltrowL. M. (2010). Punishing pregnant drug-using women: Defying law, medicine, and common sense. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29, 231–244.
27.
FossS. K. (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice (4th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
28.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). New York: Random House, Inc.
29.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
30.
GamburdM. R. (2008). Breaking the ashes: The culture of illicit liquor in Sri Lanka. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
31.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on a the management of a spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
32.
GoodeE. (2008a). Drugs in the news. In Drugs in American society (7th ed., pp. 121–145). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
33.
GoodeE. (2008b). Stimulants: Amphetamines, methamphetamine, cocaine, and crack. In Drugs in American society (7th ed., pp. 276–306). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
34.
GoodeE., & Ben-YehudaN. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
35.
GreenG. (2009). The end of stigma? Changes in the social experience of long-term illness. New York: Routledge.
36.
GreenR., & MooreD. (2013). “Meth circles” and “pipe pirates”: Crystal methamphetamine smoking and identity management among a social network of young adults. Substance Use & Misuse, Early Online.
37.
GrinspoonL., & HedblomP. (1975). The speed culture: Amphetamine use and abuse in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38.
GroupP. N. (1989). Truths. In GroupP. N. (Ed.), Interpreting women's lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives (pp. 261–264). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
39.
HohmanM.OliverR., & WrightW. (2004). Methamphetamine abuse and manufacture: The child welfare response. Social Work, 9(3), 373–381.
40.
HowarthC. (2006). Race as stigma: Positioning the stigmatized as agents, not objects. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 442–451.
41.
HserY.-I.EvansE., & HuangY.-C. (2005). Treatment outcomes among women and men methamphetamine abusers in California. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28, 77–85.
42.
HumphriesD. (1999). Crack mothers: Pregnancy, drugs, and the media. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
43.
HuntG., & BarkerJ. C. (2001). Socio-cultural anthropology and alcohol and drug research: Towards a unified theory. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 165–188.
44.
IrwinS., & JordanB. (1987). Knowledge, practice, and power: Court-ordered cesarean sections. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(3), 319–334.
45.
JeffersonD. J. (2005, August 8). America's Most Dangerous Drug. Newsweek, 41–48.
46.
JoeK.A. (1995). Ice is strong enough for a man but made for a woman. Crime, Law & Social Change, 22, 269–289.
47.
JoeK. A. (1996). The lives and times of Asian-Pacific American women drug users: An ethnographic study of their methamphetamine use. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 199–218.
48.
LendeD. H.LeonardT.SterkC. E., & ElifsonK. (2007). Functional methamphetamine use: The insider's perspective. Addiction Research & Theory, 15(5), 465–477.
49.
LinnemannT. (2010). Mad men, meth moms, moral panic: Gendering meth crimes in the Midwest. Critical Criminology, 18(2), 95–110.
50.
LinnemannT.HansonL., & WilliamsL. S. (2013). ‘With scenes of blood and pain’: Crime control and the punitive imagination of The Meth Project. British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 605–623.
51.
LinnemannT., & WallT. (2013). ‘This is your face on meth’: The punitive spectacle of ‘white trash’ in the rural war on drugs. Theoretical Criminology, 1–20. doi:10.1177/1362480612468934.
52.
LopezV.JurikN., & Gilliard-MatthewsS. (2009). Gender, sexuality, power and drug acquisition strategies among adolescent girls who use meth. Feminist Criminology, 4, 226–251.
53.
LorvickJ.MartinezA.GeeL., & KralA. H. (2006). Sexual and injection risk among women who inject methamphetamine in San Francisco. Journal of Urban Health, 83(3), 497–505.
54.
MaherL., & CurtisR. (1992). Women on the edge of crime: Crack cocaine and the changing contexts of street-level sex work in New York City. Crime, Law and Social Change, 18, 221–258.
55.
MaherL.DunlapE.JohnsonB. D., & HamidA. (1996). Gender, power, and alternative living arrangements in the inner-city crack culture. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 181–205.
56.
McKennaS. A. (2011a). Maintaining class, producing gender: Enhancement discourses about amphetamine in entertainment media. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 455–462.
57.
McKennaS. A. (2011b). Social problem vs. cultural symptom: The construction of amphetamine use and users in popular media. Paper presented at the Society for Psychological Anthropology Annual Meeting.
58.
MelleyT. (2002). A terminal case: William Burroughs and the logic of addiction. In BrodieJ. F. & RedfieldM. (Eds.), High anxieties: Cultural studies in addiction (pp. 38–60). Berkeley: University of California Press.
59.
MorganP., & JoeK. A. (1996). Citizens and outlaws: The private lives and public lifestyles of women in the illicit drug economy. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 125–142.
60.
MountianI. (2005). Images of women and drugs. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 4(Feminisms and Activisms), 81–95.
61.
MurakawaN. (2011). Toothless: The methamphetamine “epidemic,” “meth mouth,” and the racial construction of drug scares. Du Bois Review, 8(1), 219–228.
62.
MurphyS., & RosenbaumM. (1999). Pregnant women on drugs: Combating stereotypes and stigma. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
63.
NackA. (2002). Bad girls and fallen women: Chronic STD diagnoses as gateways to tribal stigma. Symbolic Interaction, 25(4), 463–485.
64.
RasmussenN. (2008). On speed: The many lives of amphetamine. New York: NYU Press.
65.
RawsonR. A.HuberA.BrethenP.ObertJ. L.GulatiV.ShoptawS. (2008). Status of methamphetamine users 2–5 years after outpatient treatment. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 21(1), 107–119.
66.
ReinarmanC., & LevineH. G. (1997a). The crack attack: Politics and media in the crack scare. In ReinarmanC. & LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice (pp. 18–21). Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
ReinarmanC., & LevineH. G. (1997b). Crack in context: America's latest demon drug. In ReinarmanC. & LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice (pp. 1–17). Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
ReissmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
69.
RödnerS. (2005). “I am not a drug abuser, I am a drug user”: A discourse analysis of 44 drug users' construction of identity. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(4), 333–346.
70.
RodriguezN., & GriffinM. L. (2005). Gender Differences in Drug Market Activities: A Comparative Assessment of Men and Women's Participation in the Drug Market. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
71.
SAMHSA. (2012). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
72.
SchensulS. L.SchensulJ. J., & LeCompteM. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
73.
SempleS. J.GrantI., & PattersonT. L. (2004). Female methamphetamine users: Social characteristics and sexual risk behavior. Women & Health, 40(3), 35–50.
74.
SempleS. J.GrantI., & PattersonT. L. (2005). Utilization of drug treatment programs by methamphetamine users: The role of social stigma. The American Journal on Addictions, 14, 367–380.
75.
SextonR. L.CarlsonR. G.LeukefeldC. G., & BoothB. M. (2008). Trajectories of methamphetamine use in the rural South: A longitudinal qualitative study. Human Organization, 67(2), 181–193.
76.
SiegelL. (1997). The pregnancy police fight the War on Drugs. In ReinarmanC. & LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice (pp. 249–259). Berkeley: University of California Press.
77.
SterkC. E. (1999). Fast lives: Women who use crack cocaine. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
78.
SuthersJ.EsquibelJ.ClarkC.WoodardJ., & ErbN. (2012). State of Colorado Methamphetamine Task Force 6th Annual Report. Denver.
WeeksM. R.ConveyM.Dickson-GomezJ.LiJ.RaddaK.MartinezM. (2009). Changing drug users' risk environments: Peer health advocates as multi-level community change agents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 330–344.
