This study employs survey data from the Center for Community College Student Engagement to examine the similarities and differences that exist across student-level domains in terms of student engagement in community colleges. In total, the sample used in the analysis pools data from 663 community colleges and includes more than 320,000 students. Using data-mining techniques to discover a parsimonious number of natural clusters and, in turn, a k-means cluster analysis as a means of revealing a naturally occurring typology of engagement patterns, our findings reveal that support service utilization is the most distinguishing feature of the similarities and dissimilarities across student groups, suggesting areas for further theory development and testing.
AdelmanC. (2005). Moving into town—and moving on: The community college in the lives of traditional-age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
AmmonB. V.BowmanJ.MouradR. (2008). Who are our students? Cluster analysis as a tool for understanding community college student populations. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 16(1), 32-44.
4.
AngellL. R. (2009). Construct validity of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 564-570. doi:10.1080/10668920801901217
5.
ArabieP.HubertL. J. (1996). An overview of combinatorial data analysis. In ArabieP.HubertL. J.de SoeteG. (Eds.), Clustering and classification (pp. 5-63). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
6.
AstinA. W. (1973). Measurement and determinants of the outputs of higher education. In SolomonL.TaubmanP. (Eds.), Does college matter? Some evidence on the impacts of higher education (pp. 107-127). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
8.
AstinA. W. (1993). An empirical typology of college students. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 36-46.
9.
AstinA. W. (2001). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
BahrP. (2010). The bird’s eye view of community colleges: A behavioral typology of first-time students based on cluster analytic classification. Research in Higher Education, 51, 724-749. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9180-5
BaileyT.CalcagnoJ. C.JenkinsD.KienzlG.LeinbachT. (2005). The effects of institutional factors on the success of community college students (CCRC Brief No. 24). Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=208
14.
BeanJ. P. (2005). Nine themes of college student retention. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 215-244). Washington, DC: ACE and Praeger.
15.
BraggD. D.KimE.BarnettE. A. (2006). Creating access and success: Academic pathways reaching underserved students. In BraggD. D.BarnettE. A. (Eds.), Academic pathways to and from the community college (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 135, pp. 5-19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/cc243
16.
BraxtonJ. M.LienL. (2000). The viability of academic integration as a central construct in Tinto’s interactionalist theory of college student departure. In BraxtonJ. (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 11-28). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
17.
BurnettS. (2006, December18). Student engagement: More counseling, tutoring and better communication with professors are considered key to improving the success of community college students. Community College Week, 6-8.
18.
CabreraA. F.NoraA.CastanedaM. B. (1993). College persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 123-139.
19.
CabreraA. F.NoraA.TerenziniP. T.PascarellaE.HagedornL. S. (1999). Campus racial climate and the adjustment of students to college. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 134-160.
CreswellJ. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
DuranB. S.OdellP. L. (1974). Cluster analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
26.
FraleyC.RafteryA. E. (1998). How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. The Computer Journal, 41, 578-588. doi:10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578
GibsonA. M.SlateJ. R. (2010). Student engagement at two-year institutions: Age and generational status differences. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 34, 371-385.
29.
GnanadesikanR.KettenringJ. R.TsaoS. L. (1995). Weighting and selection of variables for cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 12, 113-136. doi:10.1007/BF01202271
30.
HagedornL. S. (2010). The pursuit of student success: The directions and challenges facing community colleges. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 181-218). New York, NY: Springer.
31.
HagedornL. S.PratherG. (2005, May-June). The community college solar system: If university students are from Venus community college students must be from Mars. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research, San Diego, CA.
32.
HardyA. (1996). On the number of clusters. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 23(1), 83-96.
33.
HarperS. R.CariniR. M.BridgesB. K.HayekJ. C. (2004). Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at historically Black colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 271-284.
34.
HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (2009). Beyond sameness, with engagement and outcomes for all. In HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
HarrisF.LesterJ. (2009). Gender-specific approaches to enhancing identity development among undergraduate men and women. In HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 99-116). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
HartiganJ. A. (1985). Statistical theory in clustering. Journal of Classification, 2, 63-76. doi:10.1007/BF01908064
37.
HartiganJ. A.WongM. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28, 100-108.
38.
KarpM. M.HughesK. L.O’GaraL. (2008). An exploration of Tinto’s integration framework for community college students (CCRC Working Paper No. 12). Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=615
39.
KaswormC. E. (1980). Student services for the older undergraduate student. Journal of College Student Personnel, 21, 163-169.
40.
KaufmanL.RouseeuwP. J. (2005). Finding group in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
41.
KetchenD. J.ShookC. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 441-458.
42.
KuhG. D. (2004, September). Student engagement: Understanding it; measuring it; and grasping the implications. Invited presentation to University of Illinois Higher Education Colloquium, Urbana, IL.
43.
KuhG. D.GonyeaR. M. (2003). The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College & Research Libraries, 64, 256-282.
44.
KuhG. D.KinzieJ.BuckleyJ. A.BridgesB. K.HayekJ. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature commissioned report for the National Symposium on Postsecondary Student Success: Spearheading a dialog on student success. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
45.
KuhG. D.KinzieJ.SchuhJ. H.WhittE. J. & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46.
LamkinM. D. (2004). To achieve the dream, first look at the facts. Change, 36(6), 12-15.
47.
MantonK. G.LowrimoreG.YashinA.KovtonM. (2005). Cluster analysis: Overview. In Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (Vol. 1, pp. 305-315). West Sussex, UK: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa101
48.
MardiaK.KentJ. T.BibbyJ. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
MartiC. N. (2009). Dimensions of student engagement in American community colleges: Using the Community College Student Report in research and practice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 1-24. doi:10.1080/10668920701366867
51.
McClenneyK. (2006). Benchmarking effective educational practice. In SeybertJ. A. (Ed.), Benchmarking: An essential tool for assessment, improvement, and accountability (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 134, pp. 47-55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass doi:10.1002/cc.236
MilliganG. W.CooperM. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159-179. doi:10.1007/BF02294245
54.
PalmerJ. C. (2000). Demographics, state education reform policies, and the enduring community college role as an extension of the schools. In PalmerJ. C. (Ed.), How community colleges can create productive collaborations with local schools (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 111, pp. 93-103). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
55.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: Vol. 2. A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
PikeG. R.KuhG. D. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46, 185-209. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1599-0
57.
ProvasnikS.PlantyM. (2008). Community colleges: Special supplement to the condition of education 2008 (NCES 2008-033). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008033.pdf
58.
RomanM. A.TaylorR. T.Hahs-VaughnD. (2010). The retention index of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE): How meaningful is it?Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34, 386-401. doi:10.1080/10668920701382484
59.
RomesburgH. C. (2004). Cluster analysis for researchers. Raleigh, NC: Lulu Press.
60.
SanchezJ. R.LaananF. S. (1997). The economic returns of a community college education. Community College Review, 25(3), 73-87.
61.
SayerA. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
62.
SchonlauM. (2002). The clustergram: A graph for visualizing hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses. The Stata Journal, 2, 391-402.
63.
SchonlauM. (2004). Visualizing non-hierarchical and hierarchical cluster analyses with clustergrams. Computational Statistics, 19, 95-111. doi:10.1007/BF02915278
64.
SchuetzP. (2002). Emerging challenges for community colleges. Los Angeles, CA: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477829)
65.
ShawP. J. A. (2003). Multivariate statistics for the environmental sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
66.
SilvermanS. C.SarvenazA.StilesM. R. (2009). Meeting the needs of commuter, part-time, transfer, and returning students. In HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 223-242). New York, NY: Routledge.
SPSS Inc. (2009). PASW Statistics 18.0 for Windows user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Author.
69.
SteinleyD. (2006). k-means clustering: A half-century synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 1-34. doi:10.1348/000711005X48266
70.
ThorndikeR. L. (1953). Who belongs in the family?Psychometrika, 18, 267-276. doi:10.1007/BF02289263
71.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
TintoV. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21, 167-177.
73.
ZaritskyJ. S.ToceA. (2006). Supplemental instruction at a community college: The four pillars. In StoneM. E.JacobsG. (Eds.), Supplemental instruction: New visions for empowering student learning (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 106, pp. 23-31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/tl.230
74.
ZhaoC. M.KuhG. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115-138.
