This study reports on the results of a survey of achievement goal orientations administered to a sample of 777 students enrolled in remedial and college-level mathematics courses at a community college. Results indicate that students’ achievement goal orientations are consistent with adaptive learning patterns: Students are interested in developing competence, expect and believe they can handle challenging work, avoid self-handicapping behaviors, and exhibit a positive mathematics self-concept. However, interviews with faculty members teaching the courses in which the students were enrolled revealed that instructors had a more negative perspective. This discrepancy suggests that instructors might not be taking advantage of the high confidence and motivation to learn that their students bring to the mathematics classroom.
AdelmanC. (2005). Moving into town-and moving on: The community college in the lives of traditional-age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3.
AndermanE.MaehrM. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.
4.
AndermanE.MidgleyC. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269-298.
5.
AndermanE.MidgleyC. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 499-517.
6.
BaileyT. R. (2009). Challenge and opportunity: Rethinking the role and function of developmental education in community colleges. In BueschelA. C.VeneziaA. (Eds.), Policies and practices to improve student preparation and sucess(New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 145, pp. 11-30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BaumS.MaJ. (2007). Education pays 2007: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society(Trends in Higher Education Series). New York, NY: The College Board.
8.
BaumS.PayeaK. (2005). Education pays 2004: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society(Trends in Higher Education Series). New York, NY: The College Board.
9.
BetzN. E.HackettG. (1993). Manual for the mathematics self-efficacy scale. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
10.
BlairR. (Ed.). (2006). Beyond crossroads: Implementing mathematics standards in the first two years of college. Memphis, TN: American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges.
11.
BruinsmaM. (2004). Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 14, 549-568.
12.
CarlsonM. (1999). The mathematical behavior of six successful mathematics graduate students: Influences leading to mathematical success. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 237-258.
13.
CarmichaelC.TaylorJ. A. (2005). Analysis of student beliefs in a tertiary preparatory mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36, 713-719.
14.
ChurchM. A.ElliotA. J.GableS. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54.
CivilM. (1996, July). Connecting home and school: Funds of knowledge for mathematics teaching. Paper presented for the Working Group in Cultural Aspects in the Learning of Mathematics at the 20th International Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Valencia, Spain.
17.
CivilM. (1998, July12-17). Linking students’ own cultural mathematics and academic mathematics. A reaction to Presmeg. In OlivierA.NewsteadK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Stellenbosch, South Africa (Vol. 1, pp. 152-159). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427969)
18.
CohenD. K.RaudenbushS. W.BallD. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142.
19.
Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
CoxR. D. (2009). The college fear factor: How students and professors misunderstand one another. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DweckC. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
23.
DweckC.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
24.
FeldmanM. J. (1993). Factors associated with one-year retention in a community college. Research in Higher Education, 34, 503-512.
25.
FennemaE.CarpenterT. P.FrankeM. L.CareyD. A. (1992). Learning to use children’s mathematics thinking: A case study. In DavisR.MaherC. (Eds.), Schools, mathematics and the world of reality (pp. 93-117). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon.
26.
FennemaE.FrankeM. L.CarpenterT. P.CareyD. A. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 555-583.
27.
FriedelJ.CortinaK. S.TurnerJ. C.MidgleyC. (2010). Changes in efficacy beliefs in mathematics across the transition to middle school: Examining the effects of perceived teacher and parent goal emphases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 102-114.
28.
Goldrick-RabS. (2007). Promoting academic momentum at community colleges: Challenges and opportunities (CCRC Working Paper No. 5). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
29.
GrubbN. W. & Associates. (1999). Honored but invisible: An inside look at teaching in community colleges. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
HallM.PontonM. K. (2005). Mathematics self-efficacy of college freshman. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(3), 26-28, 30, 32.
31.
HouseJ. D. (2006). Mathematics beliefs and achievement of elementary school students in Japan and the United States: Results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 31-45.
32.
JagacinskiC. M.DudaJ. L. (2001). A comparative analysis of contemporary achievement goal orientation measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 1013-1039.
33.
KaplanA.MidgleyC. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 187-212.
34.
KhistyL. L. (1995). Making inequality: Issues of language and meanings in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In SecadaW. G.FennemaE.AdajianL. B. (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279-297). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KoskeyK. L. K.KarabenickS. A.WoolleyM. E.BonneyC. R.DeverB. V. (2010). Cognitive validity of students’ self-reports of classroom mastery goal structure: What students are thinking and why it matters. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 254-263.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
LutzerD. J.RodiS. B.KirkmanE. E.MaxwellJ. W. (2007). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States: Fall 2005 CBMS Survey. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
38.
McClainK.CobbP. (1997). An analysis of the teacher’s role in guiding the evolution of sociomathematical norms. In PehkonenE. (Ed.), Psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 224-231). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.
39.
MeeceJ. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
MeeceJ. L.BlumenfeldO.HoyleR. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.
41.
MesaV. (2007). The teaching of mathematics in community colleges. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
42.
MesaV. (2008, July). Researching mathematics instruction in community colleges. Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematics Education-TSG 8, Monterrey, Mexico.
43.
MesaV. (2010). Examples in textbooks: Examining their potential for developing metacognitive knowledge. MathAmatyc Educator, 2(1), 50-55.
44.
MesaV. (in press). Similarities and differences in classroom interaction between remedial and college mathematics classrooms in a community college. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching.
45.
MesaV.CelisS.LandeE. (2011). Teaching approaches of community college mathematics faculty: Do they relate to classroom practices?Manuscript submitted for publication.
46.
MesaV.ChangP. (2010). The language of engagement in two highly interactive undergraduate mathematics classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 21(2), 83-100.
47.
MesaV.JohnG. (2009). Textbook analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
48.
MesaV.LandeE.WhittemoreT. (2011). Methodological considerations in the analysis of classroom interaction in community college trigonometry. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
49.
MesaV.SuhH.BlakeT.WhittemoreT. (in press). Examples in college algebra textbooks: Opportunities for students’ learning. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies.
50.
MiddletonM. J.KaplanA.MidgleyC. (2004). The change in middle school students’ achievement goals in mathematics over time. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 289-311.
51.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
52.
MollL. C.Vélez-IbáñezC.GreenbergJ.WhitmoreK.SaavedraE.DworinJ.AndradeR. (1990). Community knowledge and classroom practice: Combining resources for literacy instruction. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, College of Education and Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology.
53.
MuisK. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 317-377.
54.
MuisK. R.WinneP. H.EdwardsO. V. (2009). Modern psychometrics for assessing achievement goal orientation: A Rasch analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 547-576.
55.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
56.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
57.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
PascarellaE. T.WolniakG. C.PiersonC. T.TerenziniP. T. (2003). Experiences and outcomes of first-generation students in community colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 420-429.
60.
PatrickJ.AndermanL. H.RyanA. M.EdelinK. C.MidgleyC. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35-58.
61.
PaulhusD. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS). New York, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
62.
PhillippeK. A.GonzalezSullivan L. (2005). National profile of community colleges: Trends and statistics (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.
63.
PintrichP. R.DeGrootE. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
64.
SeidmanE. (1985). In the words of the faculty: Perspectives on improving teaching and educational quality in community colleges. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65.
StiglerJ. W.GivvinK. B.ThompsonB. J. (2010). What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAmatyc Educator, 1(3), 4-16.
66.
TurnerJ. C.ThorpeP. K.MeyerD. K. (1998). Students; reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758-771.
67.
UrdanT.SchoenfelderE. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349.
68.
WaycasterP. (2001). Factors impacting success in community college developmental mathematics courses and sybsequent courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 403-416.
69.
WheelerD. L.MontgomeryD. (2009). Community college students’ views on learning mathematics in terms of their epistemological beliefs: A Q method study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 289-306.
70.
YackelE.RasmussenC. L. (2004). Beliefs and norms in the mathematics classroom. In LederG.PehkonenE.TörnerG. (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 313-330). Dordrecth, Netherlands: Kluwer.
