Sociologists have developed a wide range of pedagogical strategies to facilitate student learning about racial/ethnic, class, and gender inequalities. Despite the growing subdiscipline of the sociology of the body and evidence pointing to the prevalence of inequalities based on physical attractiveness, the pedagogical literature has yet to develop strategies for teaching students about biases based on physical attractiveness. In this article, the authors report on a pedagogical module that involves student evaluations of photographs (depicting individuals ranging in levels of physical attractiveness) using semantic differential scales, and discuss the results of this evaluation. The authors test for student learning outcomes through (1) a one-group pretest-posttest design and (2) an assessment survey with both qualitative and quantitative components. Because this photograph evaluation typically illustrates students’ beauty biases, a discussion of these results, paired with relevant readings, provides a powerful tool for the exchange of ideas about physical attractiveness biases.
AndersonErin K.FergusonSusan J., eds. 2007. Teaching the Sociology of the Body: A Collection of Syllabi, Assignments, and Other Resources. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
3.
BassiliJohn N.1981. “The Attractiveness Stereotype: Goodness or Glamour?” Basic and Applied Social Psychology2(4):235-52.
4.
BasowSusan A.BramanAmie C.1998. “Women and Body Hair: Social Perceptions and Attitudes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly22(4):637-45.
5.
BergerJosephFisekH. FamitNormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr.1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-states Approach. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing.
6.
BordoSusan. 2003. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. 2nd ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
CampbellDonald T.StanleyJulian C.1963. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8.
CashThomas F.JandaLouis H.1984. “The Eye of the Beholder.” Psychology Today18(12):46-52.
9.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
10.
ConleyDaltonGlauberRebecca. 2006. “Gender, Body Mass and Socioeconomic Status: New Evidence from the PSID.” Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research17:253-75.
11.
CrowdesMargret S.2000. “Embodying Sociological Imagination: Pedagogical Support for Linking Bodies to Minds.” Teaching Sociology28(1):24-40.
12.
DavisKathy. 1991. “Remaking the She-devil: A Critical Look at Feminist Approaches to Beauty.” Hypatia6(2):21-43.
13.
DellingerKirstenWilliamsChristine L.1997. “Makeup at Work: Negotiating Appearance Rules in the Workplace.” Gender & Society11(2):151-77.
14.
DeutschFrancine M.ZalenskiCarla M.ClarkMary E.1986. “Is There a Double Standard of Aging?” Journal of Applied Social Psychology16(9):771-85.
15.
EaglyAlice H.AshmoreRichard D.MakhijaniMona G.LongoLaura C.1991. “What Is Beautiful Is Good, But . . .: A Meta-analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype.” Psychological Bulletin110(1):109-28.
16.
Fausto-SterlingAnne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
17.
FeingoldAlan. 1992. “Good-looking People Are Not What We Think.” Psychological Bulletin111(2):304-41.
18.
FriezeIrene HansonOlsonJosephine E.RussellJune. 1991. “Attractiveness and Income for Men and Women in Management.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology21(13):1039-1057.
19.
GagnéPatriciaMcGaugheyDeanna. 2002. “Designing Women: Cultural Hegemony and the Exercise of Power among Women Who Have Undergone Elective Mammoplasty.” Gender & Society16(6):814-38.
20.
GimlinDebra. 2002. Body Work: Beauty and Self-image in American Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
HammermeshDaniel S.BiddleJeff E.1994. “Beauty and the Labor Market.” American Economic Review84(5):1174-94.
22.
HarlowRoxanna. 2009. “Innovations in Teaching Race and Class Inequality: ‘Bittersweet Candy’ and the ‘Vanishing Dollar.’” Teaching Sociology37(2):194-204.
23.
HatfieldElaineSprecherSusan. 1986. Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
HosodaMegumiStone-RomeroEugene F.CoatsGwen. 2003. “The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Job-related Outcomes: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies.” Personnel Psychology56(2):431-62.
25.
JohnsonAllan G.2005. The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy. 2nd ed.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
KwanSamanthaTrautnerMary Nell. 2009. “Beauty Work: Individual and Institutional Rewards, the Reproduction of Gender, and Questions of Agency.” Sociology Compass3(1):49-71.
28.
MacNevinAudrey L.2004. “Embodying Sociological Mindfulness: Learning about Social Inequality through the Body.” Teaching Sociology32(3):314-21.
29.
McKinleyNita Mary. 1999. “Ideal Weight/Ideal Women: Society Constructs the Female.” Pp. 97-115 in Weighty Issues: Fatness and Thinness as Social Problems, edited by SobalJ.MaurerD.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
30.
MessnerMichael. 1990. “Boyhood, Organized Sports, and the Construction of Masculinities.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18(4):416-44.
31.
NicholsLauraBerryJoshuaKalogridesDemetra. 2004. “Hop on the Bus: Driving Stratification Concepts Home.” Teaching Sociology32(2):213-21.
32.
PadavicIreneReskinBarbara. 2002. Women and Men at Work. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
33.
PuhlRebeccaBrownellKelly D.2001. “Bias, Discrimination, and Obesity.” Obesity Research9(12):788-805.
34.
RhodeDeborah L.2010. The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
SchwartzMarlene B.ChamblissHeather O’NealBrownellKelly D.BlairSteven N.BillingtonCharles. 2003. “Weight Bias among Health Professionals Specializing in Obesity.” Obesity Research11(9):1033-39.
36.
SingletonRoyce A.StraitsBruce C.2010. Approaches to Social Research. 5th ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
SniderJames G.OsgoodCharles E., eds. 1969. Semantic Differential Technique: A Sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
38.
SobalJeffery. 2004. “Sociological Analysis of the Stigmatisation of Obesity.” Pp. 187-204 in A Sociology of Food and Nutrition: The Social Appetite, edited by GermovJ.WilliamsL.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
TiemannKathleen A.DavisKarenEideTerri L.2006. “What Kind of Car Am I? An Exercise to Sensitize Students to Social Class Inequality.” Teaching Sociology34(4):398-403.
40.
TiggemannMarikaLewisChristine. 2004. “Attitudes toward Women’s Body Hair: Relationship with Disgust Sensitivity.” Psychology of Women Quarterly28(4):381-87.
41.
UmbersonDebraHughesMichael. 1987. “The Impact of Physical Attractiveness on Achievement and Psychological Well-being.” Social Psychology Quarterly50(3):227-36.
42.
WebsterMurrayJr.DriskellJames E.1983. “Beauty as Status.” American Journal of Sociology89(1):140-65.
43.
WeitzRose. 2001. “Women and Their Hair: Seeking Power through Resistance and Accommodation.” Gender & Society15(5):667-86.
WilliamsChristine L.1992. “The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the ‘Female’ Professions.” Social Problems39(3):253-67.
47.
WolfNaomi. 1991. The Beauty Myth. New York: Harper Collins.
48.
YoungLaura M.PowellBrian. 1985. “The Effects of Obesity on the Clinical Judgments of Mental Health Professionals.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior26(3):233-246.
