Inspired by inquiry-guided learning and critical self-reflection as pedagogical approaches, we describe exercises that encourage students to develop critical thinking skills through inquiry and reflective writing. Students compile questions and reflections throughout the course and, at the end of the term, use their writings for a comprehensive analytic self-reflection that examines their intellectual and sociological growth. Following Schwalbe’s (2008) urging to emphasize sociological thinking over disciplinary nuances in introductory courses, we describe several complementary methods for teaching students how to think like sociologists. We detail five inquiry exercises and three reflection exercises that build up to the final analytic reflection essay. The unique value of these exercises is that students not only engage the course material throughout the course but also learn to examine their own writing as data. In doing so, students learn to value the process of learning, inquiry, and critical self-reflection while acquiring and constructing self-knowledge.
AtkinsonMaxineHuntAndrea. 2008. “Inquiry-guided Learning in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology36(1):1-7.
4.
BainKen. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BallDavidWoodMikeLindsleyCraigMollardPaulBuzardD. J.VivianRandyMahoneyMaxTaftBenjamin. 2004. “Research, Teaching and Professional Development at a Comprehensive University.” Journal of Chemical Education81(12):1796-800.
6.
BarakMiriDoriYehudit Judy. 2005. “Enhancing Undergraduate Students’ Chemistry Understanding through Project-based Learning in an IT Environment.” Science Education89(1):117-39.
7.
BeanJohn C.2001. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BloomBenjamin. 1956. Taxonomy of Learning Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: D. McKay Publishing.
9.
ColesC. R.1985. “Differences between Conventional and Problem-based Curricula in Their Students’ Approaches to Studying.” Medical Education19(4): 308-09.
10.
DeweyJohn. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
11.
FelderRichardBrentRebecca. 2004. “The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students: Teaching to Promote Intellectual Growth.” Journal of Engineering Education93(4):279-91.
12.
FreirePaulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
13.
GoodwinGlenn A.1987. “Humanistic Sociology and the Craft of Teaching.” Teaching Sociology15(1):15-20.
14.
GrauerholzLizZippJohn F.2008. “How to Do the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching Sociology36(1):87-94.
15.
HauryDavid. 1993. “Teaching Science through Inquiry.” ERIC/CSMEE Digest. Columbus, OH: Eric Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
16.
hooksbell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
17.
hooksbell. 2003. Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Routledge.
18.
HoopKatrina C.2009. “Students’ Lived Experiences as Text in Teaching the Sociological Imagination.” Teaching Sociology37(1):47-60.
19.
HymanMichaelLuginbuhlGerry. 2004. “Inquiry-guided Learning and the Undergraduate Major in the Department of Microbiology.” Pp. 129-41 in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by LeeV. S.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
20.
JusticeChristopherWarryWayneCuneoCarlInglisSueMillerStephaniaRiceJamesSammonShelia. 2001. “A Grammar for Inquiry: Linking Goals and Methods in a Collaboratively Taught Social Sciences Inquiry Course.” In The Alan Blizzard Award. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Ontario: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
21.
KaganSpencer. 1994. Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
22.
KennedyAnaNavey-DavisSusan. 2004. “Inquiry-guided Learning and the Foreign Language Classroom.” Pp. 71-80 in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by LeeV. S.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
23.
KramerJonathanArnoldAlison. 2004. “Music 200: Understanding Music.” Pp. 41-50 in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by LeeV. S.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
24.
VirginiaLee, ed. 2004. Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
25.
LeeVirginiaGreeneDavidOdomJaniceSchechterEphraimSlattaRichard. 2004. “What Is Inquiry-guided Learning?” Pp. 3-16 in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by LeeV. S.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
26.
LukeChristopher. 2006. “Fostering Learning Autonomy in a Technology-enhanced, Inquiry-based Foreign Language Classroom.” Foreign Language Annals39(1):71-86.
27.
MalinowskiArlene. 2004. “Incorporating Active Learning, Critical Thinking, and Problem-based Learning in an Advanced French Culture and Civilization Course.” Pp. 81-92 in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by LeeV. S.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
28.
McIntyreLisa J.2006a. The Practical Skeptic: Core Concepts in Sociology. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
McIntyreLisa J.2006b. The Practical Skeptic: Readings in Sociology. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. London, England: Oxford University Press.
NormanGeoffreySchmidtHenk. 1992. “The Psychological Basis of Problem-based Learning: A Review of the Evidence.” Academic Medicine67(9):557-65.
33.
PrinceMichaelFelderRichard. 2006. “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases.” Journal of Engineering Education95(2):123-38.
34.
PrinceMichaelFelderRichard. 2007. “The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning.” Journal of College Science Teaching36(5):15-20.
35.
RamsdenPaul. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge/Falmer.
36.
ReimersChristineRobersonWilliam. 2006. “Using Inquiry-guided Learning to Promote Critical Thinking.” Presentation at North Carolina State University Faculty Workshop, Raleigh, NC.
37.
RobertsKeith. 1993. “Toward a Sociology of Writing.” Teaching Sociology21(4):317-24.
38.
RobertsKeith. 2002. “Ironies of Effective Teaching: Deep Structure Learning and Constructions of the Classroom.” Teaching Sociology30(1):1-25.
39.
RubinSusan1996. “Evaluation and Meta-analysis of Selected Research Related to the Laboratory Component of Beginning College Level Science.” PhD dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
40.
SchwalbeMichael L.2008. The Sociologically Examined Life: Pieces of the Conversation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
ShymanskyJamesHedgesLarryWoodworthGeorge. 1990. “A Reassessment of the Effects of Inquiry-based Science Curricula of the 60’s on Student Performance.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching27(2):127-44.
42.
ShulmanLee. 2000. “From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a Scholarship for Teaching and Learning?” Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1(1):48-53.
43.
SlattaRichard. 2004. “Enhancing Inquiry-guided Learning with Technology in History Courses.” Pp. 93-102 in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by. LeeV. S.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
44.
SlattaRichardAtkinsonMaxine. 2007. “Using Primary Sources Online: An Inquiry Learning Approach to Teaching Western History.” Journal of the West46(2):14-21.
45.
SmithD.1996. “A Meta-analysis of Student Outcomes Attributable to the Teaching of Science as Inquiry as Compared to Traditional Methodology.” PhD dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia. PA.
46.
VolkmannMarkZgagaczMarta. 2004. “Learning to Teach Physics though Inquiry: The Lived Experience of a Graduate Teaching Assistant.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching41(6):584-602.
47.
ZollerUri. 1999. “Scaling-up of Higher-order Cognitive Skills–oriented College Chemistry Teaching: An Action-oriented Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching36(5):583-96.
