Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A recent trend in DTC advertising has been the increasing presence of nonbranded, or help-seeking, ads. These ads make no mention of a branded medication, using only the pharmaceutical manufacturer as an identifier. Though these ads have been around since the inception of DTC, no direct comparison to the branded counterpart has been conducted in the literature. An online survey panel was used to examine the effects of these two DTC ad types, branded and nonbranded, on behavioral intentions. Whether these self-reported measures of intent correlated to a predefined information-seeking behavior was also analyzed. Results showed that subjects who either viewed the nonbranded ad or had a high level of disease state involvement had more positive behavioral intentions. Overall, intent did not correlate to the predefined behavior. However, those with higher behavioral intentions performed the behavior significantly more. Non-branded ads induced greater behavioral intentions, which could lead to more physician discussions and increased information-seeking behavior. Given DTC's goal of increasing physician interaction, these results suggest non-branded ads can be a viable and very productive part of the marketing mix.

Keywords

Behavioral intentions Nonbranded Prescription Advertising

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnst

Big pharma seeks an image cure. Business Week Online. December 2005. www.businessweek.com/print/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051208_397864.htm.

Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: help-seeking and other disease awareness communications by or in behalf of drug and device forms. January 2004. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070068.pdf.

Chandon

Morwitz

Reinartz

. Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. J Market. 2005;69: 1–14.

Ajzen

Fishbein

Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.

Ajzen

From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl

Beckman

(eds.), Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985:11–39.

Davis

Warshaw

. What do intention scales measure? J Gen Psychol. 2001;119(4):391–407.

Morwitz

Johnson

Schmittlein

Does measuring intent change behavior?

J Consumer Res. 1993;20:46–61.

Fitzsimons

Morwitz

. The effect of measuring intent on brand-level purchase behavior. J Consumer Res. 1996;23: 1–11.

Morwitz

Fitzsimons

. The mere-measurement effect: why does measuring intentions change actual behavior? J Consumer Psychol 2004;14(1–2):64–74.

10.

Menon

Desphande

Zinkhan

Perri

A model assessing the effectiveness of direct-to-consumer advertising: integration of concepts and measures from marketing and healthcare. Int J Adv. 2004;23: 91–118.

11.

Perri

Dickson

. Consumer and physician attitudes toward direct-to-consumer advertising. J Pharm Market Mgmt. 1987;2(1):3–25.

12.

Perri

Dickson

. Consumer reaction to a direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising campaign. J Health Care Market. 1988;8(2):66–69.

13.

Attitude toward direct-to-consumer advertising and drug inquiry intention: the moderating role of perceived knowledge. J Health Commun. 2007;12: 567–580.

14.

Herzenstein

Misra

Posavac

. How consumers’ attitudes toward direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs influence ad effectiveness, and consumer and physician behavior. Market Lett. 2004;15(4):201–212.

15.

Doucette

Schommer

. Consumer preferences for drug information after direct-to-consumer advertising. Drug Inf J. 1998;32: 1081–1089.

16.

Williams

Hensel

. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. J Health Care Market. 1995;15(1):35–41.

17.

Zoomerang

www.zoomerang.com.

18.

Zaichkowsky

. The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J Advertis. 1994;23(4):59–70.

19.

MacKenzie

Lutz

Belch

. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. J Market Res. 1986;23: 130–143.

20.

Muehling

Laczniak

. Advertising's immediate and delayed influence on brand attitudes: considerations across message-involvement levels. J Advertis. 1988;17(4):23–34.

21.

MacKenzie

Lutz

. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pre-testing context. J Market. 1989;53(2):48–65.

22.

Bergkvist

Rossiter

. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J Market Res. 2007;44: 175–184.

23.

Cohen

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.

Behavioral Intentions and Information-Seeking Behavior: A Comparison of Nonbranded versus Branded Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Advertisements

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References