This study examined Korean Americans’ evaluation and use of online advertising and non-advertising sources of prescription drug information and compared the findings to those of white Americans. A mail survey was conducted with a disproportionate stratified sample of 600 adults (300 general population and 300 Korean Americans) who have ever taken or are currently taking prescription drugs regularly and reside in a metropolitan area in the Midwestern United States. While both Korean and white Americans evaluated online non-advertising sources more positively than advertising sources, the 2 groups were similar in their evaluation of both online advertising and non-advertising sources. White Americans tended to use more online advertising sources than did Korean Americans, but both groups were equally likely to use non-advertising sources. Evaluation and use of online advertising and non-advertising sources by Korean and white Americans were associated with different predictors.
DeLormeDHuhJReidL. Source selection in prescription drug information seeking and influencing factors: applying the comprehensive model of information seeking in an American context. J Health Comm. 2011;16:766–787.
2.
NapoliP. Consumer use of medical information from electronic and paper media: a literature review. In: RiceRKatzJ, eds. The Internet and Health Communication: Experiences and Expectations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001:79–98.
3.
DeLormeDHuhJReidLAnS. Advertising in health communication: promoting pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements to U.S. consumers. In: ThompsonTParrottRNussbaumJ, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:268–290.
4.
DeLormeDHuhJReidL. Evaluation, use, and usefulness of prescription drug information sources among Anglo- and Hispanic-Americans. J Health Comm. 2010;15:18–38.
5.
DiehlSMuellerBTerlutterR. Consumer responses towards non-prescription and prescription drug advertising in the US and Germany. Int J Adv. 2008;27:99–131.
GalarceERamanadhanSViswanathK. Health information seeking. In: ThompsonTParrottRNussbaumJ, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:67–180.
FogelJNovickD. Direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription medications over the Internet. Health Market Quar. 2009;26:347–371.
10.
WymerW. Consumer perceptions of prescription drug Websites: a pilot study. Health Market Quar. 2010;27:173–194.
11.
ChoiSLeeW. Understanding the impact of direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmaceutical advertising on patient-physician interactions: adding the web to the mix. J Adv. 2007;36:137–149.
12.
HuhJCudeB. Is the information “fair and balanced” in direct-to-consumer prescription drug websites?J Health Comm. 2004;9:529–540.
13.
HuYSundarS. Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Comm Res. 2010;37:105–132.
14.
LorenceDParkHFoxS. Racial disparities in health information access: resilience of the digital divide. J Medical Systems. 2006;30:241–249.
15.
NguyenGBellamyS. Cancer information seeking preferences and experiences: disparities between Asian Americans and whites in the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Comm. 2006;11:173–180.
16.
MenonADeshpandeAPerriMZinkhanG. Trust in online prescription drug information among Internet users: the impact on information search behavior after exposure to direct-to-consumer advertising. Health Market Quart. 2002;20:17–35.
17.
LeeHHannerJChoJHanRKimT. Improving access to mental health services for Korean American immigrants: moving toward a community partnership between religious and mental health services. Psychiatry Investig. 2008;5:14–20.
18.
OhKKrepsGJunJRamseyL. Cancer information seeking and awareness of cancer information sources among Korean Americans. J Cancer Ed. 2011;26:355–364.
ShinHBrunoR. Language Use and English Speaking Ability 2000: Census 2000 Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2003.
21.
ReevesTBennettC. We the People: Asians in the United States. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2004.
22.
KaoD. Factors associated with ethnic differences in health insurance coverage and type among Asian Americans. J Community Health. 2010;35:142–155.
23.
ShinHSongHKimJProbstJC. Insurance, acculturation, and health service utilization among Korean-Americans. J Immigrant Health. 2005;7:65–74.
24.
IharaES. Ethnicity matters: the socioeconomic gradient in health among Asian Americans. J Sociol Soc Welfare. 2009;36:125–144.
25.
SohnLHaradaN. Time since immigration and health service utilization of Korean-American older adults living in Los Angeles county. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2004;52:1946–1950.
26.
GuoGCheungFLeungWChowC. Attitudes toward Internet advertising: a cross-cultural study. Int J Internet Market Adv. 2006;3:158–176.
27.
SchlosserAShavittSKanferA. Survey of Internet users’ attitudes toward Internet advertising. J Interactive Market. 1999;13:1–21.
28.
FaberRLeeMNanX. Advertising and the consumer information environment online. Am Behav Scientist. 2004;48:447–466.
29.
KimJMcMillanS. Evaluation of Internet advertising research: a bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. J Adv. 2008;37:99–112.
30.
JinCVillegasJ. Consumer responses to advertising on the Internet: the effect of individual difference on ambivalence and avoidance. CyperPsy Behav. 2007;10:258–266.
31.
KorgaonkarPWolinLD. Web usage, advertising, and shopping: relationship patterns. Internet Res. 2002;12:191–204.
32.
BecerraEKorgaonkarP. The influence of ethnic identification in digital advertising. J Adv Res. 2010;50:279–291.
33.
BurnsKSLutzRJ. The function of format: Consumer responses to six online advertising formats. J Adv. 2006; 35:53–61.
34.
SunSWangY. Familiarity, beliefs, attitudes, and consumer responses toward online advertising in China and the United States. J Global Market. 2010;23:127–138.
35.
LeeWChoiS. The role of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism in online consumers’ responses toward persuasive communication on the Web. J Computer-Mediated Comm. 2006;11:317–336.
36.
AnDKimSH. A first investigation into the cross-cultural perceptions of Internet advertising: a comparison of Korean and American attitudes. J Int Consumer Market. 2007;20:49–65.
37.
PetersonRAMerinoMC. Consumer information search behavior and the Internet. Psy Market. 2003;20:99–121.
38.
RainsS. Perceptions of traditional information sources and use of the World Wide Web to seek health information: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Health Comm. 2007;12:667–680.
39.
Dutta-BergmanM. Trusted online sources of health information: differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation. J Medical Internet Res. 2003;5: e21.
40.
MaciasWLewisL. How well do direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug web sites meet FDA guidelines and public policy concerns?Health Market Quar. 2005;22:45–71.
41.
DavisJ. The effect of placement and modality on the recall of information from pharmaceutical web sites. J Med Market. 2010;10:99–114.
42.
HeatherJ. Liability for direct-to-consumer advertising and drug information on the Internet. Defense Counsel J. 2001;68:412–420.
43.
HuhJDeLormeDReidL. Factors affecting trust in online prescription drug information and impact of trust on behavior following exposure to DTC advertising. J Health Comm. 2005;10:711–731.
44.
MaddoxL. The use of pharmaceutical web sites for prescription drug information and product requests. J Prod Brand Manage. 1999;8:488–496.
45.
KimJWKingKW. Product category effects on external search for prescription and nonprescription drugs. J Adv. 2009;38:5–19.
