This study used the reinforcing spirals model to investigate the mutual influence between individuals’ media use and their global warming perceptions. Data from the science module of the 2006 General Social Survey were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results offered support for the reinforcing spirals model’s predictions. Media use mediated the effects of age, race, and education on perceived knowledge about global warming. Perceived knowledge and concern over global warming also predicted future information seeking about the polar regions.
Afifi, W.A., & Weiner, J. ( 2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14, 167-190.
2.
Ajzen, I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. ( 2006). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for survey (4th ed.). Lenexa, KS: Author.
4.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
Becker, M.H. ( 1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior . Health Education Monographs, 2, 324-508.
7.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. ( 1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
8.
Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Bollen, K.A. ( 1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. ( 1994). What do people know about global climate change? Risk Analysis, 14, 959-970.
11.
Boykoff, M.T. ( 2008). Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995-2004. Climatic Change , 86, 1-11.
12.
Boykoff, M.T., & Boykoff, J.M. ( 2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press . Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
13.
Brashers, D.E. ( 2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51, 477-497.
14.
Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (Eds.). (2002). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
15.
Byrne, B.M. ( 2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Chou, C., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Dilling, L., & Moser, S.C. ( 2007). Introduction. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communication climate change & facilitating social change (pp. 1-27). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Dunwoody, S. ( 1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty . In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Eveland, W.P., Shah, D., & Kwak, N. ( 2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359-386.
20.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. ( 2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 43-67). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
22.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., & Signorielli, N. (1981). Scientists on the TV screen . Culture and Society, 42, 51-54.
23.
Griffin, R.J., Neuwirth, K., Dunwoody, S., & Giese, J. ( 2004). Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology, 6, 23-61.
24.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
25.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ( 2007). Summary for policymakers. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt , et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The Physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kaye, B.K. ( 1998). Uses and gratifications of the World Wide Web: From couch potato to Web potato. New Jersey Journal of Communication , 6, 21-40.
28.
Kline, R.B. ( 1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . New York: Guilford.
29.
Krosnick, J.A., Holbrook, A.L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P.S. ( 2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizen’s policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change, 77, 7-43.
30.
LaFollette, M.C. ( 1990). Making science our own: Public images of science, 1910-1955 . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Leiserowitz, A.A. ( 2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous ? Risk Analysis, 25, 1433-1442.
32.
Leiserowitz, A.A. ( 2007). Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In S. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 44-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Levy, M.R., & Windahl, S. ( 1985). The concept of audience activity. In K. E. Rosengren, L. A. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 109-122). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. ( 2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
35.
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Weber, D. ( 2008). What are Americans thinking and doing about global warming? Results of a national household survey. Retrieved February 13, 2008, from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/PN_GMU_Climate_Change_Report(1).pdf
36.
Marland, G., Boden, T., & Andres, B. ( 2007). World’s countries ranked by 2004 total fossil fuel CO2 emissions. Retrieved February 13, 2008, from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/top2004.tot
37.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. ( 1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
38.
Nelkin, D. ( 1995). Selling science: How the press cover science and technology . New York: W. H. Freeman and Company .
39.
Nisbet, M.C., & Myers, T. ( 2007). The polls-trends: Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 444-470.
40.
Nisbet, M., Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B.V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology . Communication Research, 29, 584-608.
41.
Oreskes, N. ( 2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 302, 1686.
42.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A.M. ( 2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
43.
Pew Research Center. (2007). Global warming: A divide on causes and solution: Public views unchanged by unusual weather. Retrieved February 13, 2008, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=303
44.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
45.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
46.
Rimal, R.N. ( 2002). Perceived risk and self-efficacy as motivators: Understanding individuals’ long-term use of health information. Journal of Communication, 51, 633-654.
47.
Rogers, E.M. ( 2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York : Free Press.
48.
Rogers, R.W. ( 1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153-176). New York: Guilford Press.
49.
Rosengren, K.E., & Windahl, S. ( 1972). Mass media consumptions as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications (pp. 166-194). Middlesex, England: Penguin.
50.
Rubin, A.M. ( 2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects . In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525-548). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
51.
Shim, M., Kelly, B., & Hornik, R. ( 2006). Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 157-172.
52.
Slater, M.D. ( 2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity . Communication Theory, 17, 281-303.
53.
Slater, M.D., Hayes, A.F., & Ford, V.L. ( 2007). Examining the moderating and mediating roles of news exposure and attention on adolescent judgments of alcohol-related risks. Communication Research, 34, 355-381.
54.
Slater, M.D., Henry, K.L., Swaim, R.C., & Anderson, L.L. (2003). Violent media content and aggressiveness in adolescents: A downward spiral model. Communication Research, 30, 713-736.
55.
Slater, M.D., & Rasinski, K.A. (2005). Media exposure and attention as mediating variables influencing social risk judgments. Journal of Communication, 55, 810-827.
56.
Sobel, M.E. ( 1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
57.
Southwell, B.G., & Torres, A. ( 2006). Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs, 73, 334-350.
58.
Stamm, K.R., Clark, F., & Eblacas, P.R. ( 2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 219-237.
59.
Stephenson, M.T., & Holbert, R.L. ( 2003). A Monte Carlo simulation of observable versus latent variable structural equation modeling techniques. Communication Research, 30, 332-354.
60.
Tichenor, P.J., Donohue, G.A., & Olien, C.N. ( 1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge . Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170.
61.
Vincent, R.C., & Basil, M.D. ( 1997). College students’ news gratifications, media use, and current events knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 380-392.
62.
West, S.G., Finch, J.F., & Curran, P.J. ( 1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Windahl, S. ( 1981). Uses and gratifications at the crossroads. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 2, 174-185.
64.
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. ( 1985). Selective exposure to communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
