The purpose of this study is to test hypotheses regarding the effects of commuting on commuters’ access to community-based communication resources and their level of community engagement. This study is guided by communication infrastructure theory. Online survey interviews were conducted with 1,028 Seoul residents between May 30 and June 17, 2014. We found that (1) commuters showed a higher level of community engagement than noncommuters; (2) among commuters, there was a negative relationship between commuting time and a sense of neighborhood belonging; (3) commuting time showed a positive relationship with access to community-based communication resources (i.e., integrated connectedness to community storytelling network [ICSN]) and community participation; (4) among four place-based identity groups (integrators, home-dominant group, workplace-dominant group, and disconnectors), integrators, who connected to both home and workplace, showed the highest level of ICSN and community engagement; and (5) ICSN mediated between commuting variables and community engagement variables.
Ball-RokeachS. J.KimY. C.MateiS. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 2, 8392-8428. doi:10.1177/009365001028004003
3.
BladerS. L. (2007). What leads organization members to collectivize? Injustice and identification as precursors of union certification. Organization Science, 18, 108-126. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0217
4.
BrowneM. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1-21.
5.
CameronJ. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
6.
ChavisD. M.WandersmanA. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00922689
7.
ClerkinR. M.PaarlbergL. E.ChristensenR. K.NesbitR. A.TschirhartM. (2013). Place, time, and philanthropy: Exploring geographic mobility and philanthropic engagement. Public Administration Review, 73, 97-106. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02616.x
CubaL.HummonD. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 111-131. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00133.x
10.
FischerC. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
GreenbaumS. D. (1982). Bridging ties at the neighborhood level. Social Networks, 4, 367-384. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(82)90019-3
12.
HanssonE.MattissonK.BjörkJ.ÖstergrenP. O.JakobssonK. (2011). Relationship between commuting and health outcomes in a cross-sectional population survey in southern Sweden. BMC Public Health, 11, 834-848. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-834
13.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451-470. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12028
14.
HoogheM.StolleD. (2003). Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
HumphriesS. (2001). Who’s afraid of the big, bad firm: The impact of economic scale on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 678-699. doi:10.2307/2669245
16.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
17.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24. doi:10.1257/089533006776526030
18.
KangN.KwakN. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation: Individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30, 80-106. doi:10.1177/0093650202239028
19.
KangS. (2012). The elderly population and community engagement in the Republic of Korea: The role of community storytelling network. Asian Journal of Communication, 23, 302-321. doi:10.1080/01292986.2012.725176
20.
KellyC.KellyJ. (1994). Who gets involved in collective action?Human Relations, 47, 63-88. doi:10.1177/001872679404700104
21.
KimY. C.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2006a). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16, 173-197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x
22.
KimY. C.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2006b). Community storytelling network, neighborhood context, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Human Communication Research, 32, 411-439. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x
23.
KimY. C.Ball-RokeachS. J.CohenE. L.JungJ. Y. (2002). Communication infrastructure and civic actions in crisis. In GreenbergB. S. (Ed), Communication and terrorism: Public and media responses to 9/11 (pp. 289-303). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
KimY. C.ShinE.ChoA.JungE.ShonK.ShimH. (2015). SNS dependency and community engagement in urban neighborhoods: The moderating role of integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network. Communication Research, 46, 7-32. doi:10.1177/0093650215588786
26.
KimY. C.ShonH.ShimH.LimJ. Y. (2012). New media uses and perceived environmental controllability: Cases of smartphone and social network services uses. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 29, 45-94.
LidströmA. (2006). Commuting and citizen participation in Swedish city-regions. Political Studies, 54, 865-888. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00637.x
29.
LoewenthalK. M. (2004). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
30.
MattissonK.HåkanssonC.JakobssonK. (2015). Relationships between commuting and social capital among men and women in Southern Sweden. Environment and Behavior, 47, 734-753. doi:10.1177/0013916514529969
31.
McMillanD. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315-325. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199610)24:4<315::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-T
32.
MilgramS. (1972). The familiar stranger: An aspect of urban anonymity (Division 8, Newsletter, Personality and Social Psychology Section of the American Psychological Association). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
MuthénB. (1998). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In CollinsL. M.SayerA. G. (Eds.), Decade of behavior: New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291-322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10409-010.
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthenB. (1998). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers: Users guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
36.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37.
ObstP. L.WhiteK. M. (2007). Choosing to belong: The influence of choice on social identification and psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 77-90. doi:10.1002/jcop.20135
38.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2016). The labor market position of families (LMF)_Average time spent travelling to and from work (OECD family database). Available from http://www.oecd.org/
39.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2015). How’s Life in Korea (OECD Better Life Initiative). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/
40.
PuddifootJ. E. (1996). Some initial considerations in the measurement of community identity. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 327-336. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199610)24:4<327::AID-JCOP3>3.0.CO;2-R
41.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
42.
SchaffA. H. (1952). The effect of commuting on participation in community organizations. American Sociological Review, 17, 215-220.
ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M.YoonS. H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464-506. doi:10.1177/009365001028004005
45.
SimmelG. (1903). The metropolis and mental life. In WolffK. (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 409-424). New York, NY: Free Press.
46.
TajfelH. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, England: Academic Press.
47.
ThompsonF. M. L. (1982). The rise of suburbia. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.
48.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Who drives to work? Commuting by automobile in the United States: 2013. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/hhes/commuting
49.
UrryJ. (2002). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36, 255-274. doi:10.1177/0038038502036002002
50.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
WeatherfordM. S. (1982). Interpersonal networks and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 117-143. doi:10.2307/2110843
52.
WilliamsD. (2006). On and off the ‘Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593-628.
53.
WilliamsonT. (2002). Sprawl, politics, and participation: A preliminary analysis. National Civic Review, 91, 235-244. doi:10.1002/ncr.91303
54.
WollebækD.StrømsnesK. (2010, July). Is commuting bad for civil life? Evidence from three Norwegian cities. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Third Sector Research (ISTR), Istanbul, Turkey.
55.
WothkeW. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In BollenK.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256-293). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
