The main purpose of this study was to assess treatment change at both the group level and the individual level with a sample of 313 adult male sex offenders. Generally, the results from the group-level analyses were more positive than those from the individual-level analyses. The group-level analyses revealed significant change of medium magnitude on most of the measures, whereas the individual-level analyses indicated more modest gains, with approximately one third of participants showing reliable change and reaching functional levels posttreatment. When representative norms are available, clinical significance provides a clear and established method not only for assessing the effectiveness of sex offender treatment programs but also for evaluating the progress of individual clients.
Bauer, S., Lambert, M.J., & Nielsen, S.L. ( 2004). Clinical significance methods: A comparison of statistical techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment , 82, 60-70.
2.
Becker, B.J. ( 1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 41, 257-278.
3.
Beech, A.R. ( 1998). A psychometric typology of child abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 42, 319-339.
4.
Beech, A., Erikson, M., Friendship, C., & Ditchfield, J. (2001). A six-year follow-up of men going through probation-based sex offender treatment programmes (Findings No. 144). London, UK: Home Office.
5.
Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R. ( 1999). STEP3: An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. Home Office occasional paper. London, UK: Home Office.
6.
Beech, A.R., & Ford, H. ( 2006). The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child sexual abusers completing residential treatment for their offending, Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 685-701.
7.
Bonta, J., Harman, W.G., Hann, R.G., & Cormier, R.B. ( 1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 61-79.
8.
Bumby, K.M. ( 1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37-54.
9.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
10.
Cortoni, F., & Nunes, K.L. ( 2007). Assessing the effectiveness of the National Sexual Offender Program (Research Report R-183). Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service of Canada.
11.
Fisher, D., Beech, A., & Browne, K. ( 1999). Comparison of sex offenders to nonoffenders on selected psychological measures. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 473-491.
12.
Gallagher, C.A., Wilson, D.B., Hirschfield, P., Coggeshall, M.B., & MacKenzie, D.L. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Correctional Management Quarterly, 3(4), 19-29.
13.
Hanson, R.K., Bourgon, B., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. ( 2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891.
14.
Hanson, R.K., Gordon, A., Harris, A.J.R., Marques, J.K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V.L., & Seto, M.D. ( 2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
15.
Hanson, R.K., Harris, A.J.R., Scott, T.-L., & Helmus, L. ( 2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project. Ottawa, ON : Public Safety Canada.
16.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
17.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies . Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
18.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessment for sex offenders (User Report No. 99-02). Ottawa, ON: Corrections Research, Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
19.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton D. ( 2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 119-136.
20.
Harkins, L., & Beech, A.R. ( 2007). A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: Risk, need, responsivity, and process issues . Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 615-627.
21.
Jacobson, N.S., Follette, W.C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance . Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.
22.
Jacobson, N.S., Follette, W.C., Revenstorf, D., Baucom, D.H., Hahlweg, K., & Margolin, G. ( 1984). Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral martial therapy: A reanalysis of data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 497-504.
23.
Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P. ( 1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
24.
Keeling, J.A., Rose, J.L., & Beech, A.R. ( 2006). A comparison of the application of the self-regulation model of the relapse process for mainstream and special needs sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 373-382.
25.
Keeling, J.A., Rose, J.L., & Beech, A.R. ( 2007). Assessment of intellectually disabled sexual offenders: The current position. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 229-241.
26.
Knight, R.A., & Prentky, R.A. ( 1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), The handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23-52). New York, NY : Plenum Press.
Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. ( 2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology , 1, 117-146.
29.
Mandeville-Norden, R., & Beech, A.R. ( 2009). Development of a psychometric typology of child molesters: Implications for treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 24, 307-325.
30.
Mandeville-Norden, R., Beech, A., & Hayes, E. ( 2008). Examining the effectiveness of a UK community-based sexual offender treatment programme for child abusers. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 14, 493-512.
31.
Marshall, W.L., Marshall, L.E., Sachdev, S., & Kruger, R. ( 2003). Distorted attitudes and perceptions, and their relationship with self-esteem and coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 171-181.
32.
Martinovich, Z., Saunders, S., & Howard, K.I. ( 1996). Some comments on assessing clinical significance . Psychotherapy Research, 6, 124-132.
33.
Marques, J.K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
34.
McGlinchey, J.B., Atkins, D.C., & Jacobson, N.S. (2002). Clinical significance methods: Which one to use and how useful are they? Behavior Therapy , 33, 529-550.
35.
McGrath, R., Cumming, G., Burchard, B., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. ( 2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
36.
Miller, R.S., & Lefcourt, H.M. (1982). The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 514-518.
37.
Nafekh, M., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 2002). The Statistical Information on Recidivisim-Revised (SIR-R1) Scale: A psychometric examination (Research Report No.R-126). Ottawa, ON: Research Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
38.
Nuffield, J. ( 1982). Parole decision making in Canada: Research towards decisions guidelines. Ottawa, ON: Communication Division, Solicitor General Canada.
39.
Nunes, K.L., & Cortoni, F. ( 2007). Assessing treatment change in sexual offenders . (Research Report No.R-184.) Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service Canada.
40.
Ogles, B.M., Lunnen, K.M., & Bonesteel, K. ( 2001). Clinical significance: History, application and current practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 421-446.
41.
Pervan, S., & Hunter, M. ( 2007). Cognitive distortion and social self-esteem in sexual offenders. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3, 75-91.
42.
Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. ( 1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 39, 472-480.
43.
Saum, S. ( 2007). A comparison of an actuarial risk prediction measure (Static-99) and a stable dynamic risk prediction measure (Stable-2000) in making risk predictions for a group of sexual offenders. Dissertations Abstracts International, 68(03), B. (UMI No. 3255539).
44.
Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. ( 2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225-235.
45.
Williams, F., Wakeling, H., & Webster, S. ( 2007). A psychometric study of six self-report measures for use with sexual offenders with cognitive and social functioning deficits . Psychology, Crime, and Law, 13, 505-522.
46.
Wong, S., Olver, M.E., Nicholaichuk, T.P., & Gordon, A. ( 2003). The Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version (VRS-SO) . Saskatoon, SK: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
47.
Yates, P.M., Goguen, B.C., Nicholaichuk, T.P., Williams, S.M., & Long, C.A. ( 2000). National Sex Offender Programs: Vol. 2. Moderate intensity. Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service of Canada.
