The predictive validity for the Australian Adaptation of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory was tested in a large sample (N = 4,401) of community-based juvenile offenders in New South Wales, Australia. First, we compared gender and ethnic subgroups on domain, total scores, and predictive validity. Both similarities and modest differences emerged in mean scores across subgroups. The pattern of predictive validity results showed comparable indices by gender and ethnic subgroups. Second, we supplemented our quantitative method with a review of 26 case files with the lowest risk scores and a 1-year reoffense, and 25 case files with the highest risk scores and no 1-year reoffense. We discuss implications of the findings for improving the predictive validity and practical utility of risk–need assessment with juvenile offenders.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2000). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Anderson Publishers.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2004). Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LSI/CMI): An offender assessment system. User’s guide. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
6.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S.GuzzoL.BrewsA.RettingerJ.RoweR. C. (2011). Sources of variability in estimates of predictive validity: A specification with Level of Service general risk and need. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 413-432. doi:10.1177/0093854811401990
7.
AndrewsD. A.GuzzoL.RaynorP.RoweR. C.RettingerL. J.BrewsA.WormithJ. S. (2012). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 113-133. doi:10.1177/0306624x10395716
8.
AndrewsD. A.ZingerI.HogeR. D.BontaJ.GendreauP.CullenF. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
9.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Australian Standard Offense Classification (ASOC). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
10.
BabchishinK. M.HelmusL.-M. (2016). The influence of base rates on correlations: An evaluation of proposed alternative effect sizes with real-world data. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1021-1031. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0627-7
11.
BradleyS.DracaM.GreenC.LeevesG. (2007). The magnitude of educational disadvantage of indigenous minority groups in Australia. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 547-569. doi:10.1007/s00148-006-0076-9
12.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
13.
CaldwellM. F.DickinsonC. (2009). Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 941-956. doi:10.1002/bsl.907
14.
CampbellM. A.FrenchS.GendreauP. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567-590. doi:10.1177/0093854809333610
15.
ChuC. M.DaffernM.ThomasS.LimJ. Y. (2010). Violence risk and gang affiliation in youth offenders: A recidivism study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 299-315. doi:10.1080/1068316x.2010.481626
16.
CookeM.MitrouF.LawrenceD.GuimondE.BeavonD. (2007). Indigenous well-being in four countries: An application of the UNDP’s Human Development Index to Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 7, Article 9. doi:10.1186/1472-698X-7-9
17.
DixonA.HowieP.StarlingJ. (2005). Trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, and psychiatric comorbidity in female juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 798-806. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000164590.48318.9c
18.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
19.
HogeR. D.AndrewsD. A. (1995). Australian adaptation of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
20.
HogeR. D.AndrewsD. A. (2011). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory 2.0 (YLS/CMI 2.0.). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
21.
HoltfreterK.CuppR. (2007). Gender and risk assessment. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 363-382. doi:10.1177/1043986207309436
22.
HuaJ.FitzgeraldJ. (2006). Matching court records to measure reoffending. In Crime and justice bulletin: Contemporary issues in crime and justice (Vol. 95). Sydney, Australia: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Retrieved from http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Documents/CJB/cjb95.pdf
23.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582-591.
24.
LabrecqueR. M.SmithP.LovinsB. K.LatessaE. J. (2014). The importance of reassessment: How changes in the LSI-R risk score can improve the prediction of recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53, 116-128. doi:10.1080/10509674.2013.868389
25.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology Special Issue: Knowledge in Context: Qualitative Methods in Counseling Psychology Research, 52, 250-260.
26.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WongS. C. (2012). Short and long-term prediction of recidivism using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory in a sample of serious young offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 331-344. doi:10.1037/h0093927
27.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329-353. doi:10.1177/0093854809331457
28.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2014). Thirty years of research on the Level of Service Scales: A meta-analytic examination of predictive accuracy and sources of variability. Psychological Assessment, 26, 156-176. doi:10.1037/a0035080
29.
OnifadeE.PetersenJ.BynumT. S.DavidsonW. S. (2011). Multilevel recidivism prediction: Incorporating neighborhood socioeconomic ecology in juvenile justice risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 840-853. doi:10.1177/0093854811407026
30.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384-405. doi:10.1080/07418820600869152
31.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
32.
SchmidtF.SinclairS. M.ThomasdóttirS. (2015). Predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory with youth who have committed sexual and non-sexual offenses: The utility of professional override. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 413-430. doi:10.1177/0093854815603389
33.
SchwalbeC. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449-462. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9071-7
34.
SchwalbeC. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1367-1381. doi:10.1177/0093854808324377
35.
SchweitzerR.PerkoulidisS.KromeS.LudlowC.RyanM. (2005). Attitudes towards refugees: The dark side of prejudice in Australia. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 170-179. doi:10.1080/00049530500125199
36.
ScurichN.JohnR. S. (2012). Prescriptive approaches to communicating the risk of violence in actuarial risk assessment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 50-78. doi:10.1037/a0024592
37.
ShepherdS. M.LuebbersS.DolanM. (2012). Gender and ethnicity in juvenile risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 388-408. doi:10.1177/0093854812456776
SmithP.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 183-208. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00551.x
40.
ThompsonA. P.McGrathA. (2012). Subgroup differences and implications for contemporary risk-need assessment with juvenile offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 345-355. doi:10.1037/h0093930
41.
ThompsonA. P.McGrathA. (2013). Correction to Thompson and McGrath (2012). Law and Human Behavior, 37, 106.
42.
ThompsonA. P.PopeZ. (2005). Assessing juvenile offenders: Preliminary data for the Australian adaptation of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (Hoge & Andrews, 1995). Australian Psychologist, 40, 207-214.
43.
ViljoenJ. L.ElkovitchN.ScaloraM. J.UllmanD. (2009). Assessment of reoffense risk in adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Predictive validity of the ERASOR, PCL:YV, YLS/CMI, and Static-99. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 981-1000. doi:10.1177/0093854809340991
44.
VoseB.LowenkampC. T.SmithP.CullenF. T. (2009). Gender and the predictive validity of the LSI-R. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25, 459-471. doi:10.1177/1043986209344797
45.
WelshJ. L.SchmidtF.McKinnonL.ChatthaH. K.MeyersJ. R. (2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15, 104-115. doi:10.1177/1073191107307966
46.
WestR. F.MeserveR. J.StanovichK. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 506-519. doi:10.1037/a0028857
47.
WormithJ. S. (2011). The legacy of D. A. Andrews in the field of criminal justice: How theory and research can change policy and practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 78-82. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.577138
