Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The failure of incarceration as a response to drug offenses has resulted in new policies supporting community-based alternatives. One challenge has been finding appropriate housing for persons on probation and parole. Sober living houses (SLHs) are alcohol- and drug-free living environments that are increasingly being used as housing options for these individuals. The current study examined 6- and 12-month outcomes for 330 persons on probation or parole who entered 49 SLHs. Residents in 22 houses (n = 149 individuals) were randomly assigned to receive a “Motivational Interviewing Case Management” (MICM) intervention and residents in the other 27 houses (n = 181 individuals) received SLH residency as usual. At 6- and 12-month follow-up, both study conditions showed significant improvement relative to baseline on substance abuse, criminal justice, HIV risk, and employment outcomes. For persons who attended at least one MICM session, there were better criminal justice outcomes compared with the SLH as usual group.

Keywords

sober living houses recovery home probation parole motivational interviewing case management housing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-55.

Anstiss

Polaschek

D. L.

Wilson

(2011). A brief motivational interviewing intervention with prisoners: When you lead a horse to water, can it drink for itself? Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 689-710.

Arkowitz

Miller

W. R.

Rollnick

(Eds.). (2015). Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bahr

S. J.

Masters

A. L.

Taylor

B. M.

(2012). What works in substance abuse treatment programs for offenders? The Prison Journal, 92, 155-174.

Belenko

(2006). Assessing released inmates for substance-abuse-related service needs. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 94-113.

Brennan Center for Justice. (2016). Justice update: Majority of states cut both crime and incarceration. New York. Retrieved from https://www.brennancenter.org/newsletter/justice-update-majority-states-cut-both-crime-and-incarceration+&cd&1&hl&en&ct&clnk&gl&us

Bushway

S. D.

(2006). The problem of prisoner (re)entry. Contemporary Sociology, 35, 562-565. doi:10.1177/009430610603500607

10.

Cunningham

J. A.

Sobell

L. C.

Gavin

D. R.

Sobell

M. B.

Breslin

F. C.

(1997). Assessing motivation for change: Preliminary development and evaluation of a scale measuring the costs and benefits of changing alcohol and drug use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 107-114.

11.

Eaglin

(2015, February 17). California quietly continues to reduce mass incarceration. Brennan Center for Justice: Justice for All. Retrieved from http://www.webcitation.org/6dmHBsz2O

12.

Forman

R. F.

Svikis

Montoya

I. D.

Blaine

(2004). Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.012

13.

Gerstein

D. R.

Johnson

R. A.

Foote

Suter

Jack

Merker

. . . Fountain

(1994). Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA): Methodology report. Sacramento: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Problems.

14.

Gupta

(2011). Intent to treat concept: A review. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2(3), 9-12.

15.

Harding

D. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Herbert

C. W.

(2013). Home is hard to find: Neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647, 214-236.

16.

Herberman

Bonczar

(2015). Probation and parole in the United States, 2013. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

17.

Humphreys

Kaskutas

Weisner

(1998). The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: Development, reliability, and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 22, 974-978.

18.

Jason

L. A.

Olson

B. D.

Harvey

(2015). Evaluating alternative aftercare models for ex-offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 45, 53-68.

19.

King

Peterson

Elderbroom

Taxy

S. A.

(2015). How to reduce the federal prison population. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://webapp.urban.org/reducing-federal-mass-incarceration/

20.

Korcha

Polcin

D. L.

Evans

Bond

J. C.

Galloway

G. P.

(2014). Intensive motivational interviewing for women with concurrent alcohol problems and methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46, 113-119. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.013

21.

Leukefeld

Oser

C. B.

Havens

Tindall

M. S.

Mooney

Duvall

Knudsen

(2009). Drug abuse treatment beyond prison walls. Addiction Science and Clinical Practice, 5, 513-521.

22.

Lofstrom

Martin

(2015). Public safety realignment: Impacts so far. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/publication/public-safety-realignment-impacts-so-far/

23.

McLellan

A. T.

Kushner

Metzger

Peters

Smith

Grissom

. . . Argeriou

(1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199-213. doi:10.1016/0740-5472(92)90062-S

24.

McMurran

(2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 83-100.

25.

Mericle

A. A.

Miles

Cacciola

(2015). A critical component of the substance abuse continuum of care: Recovery homes in Philadelphia. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 47, 80-90.

26.

Metzger

D. S.

Navaline

H. A.

Woody

G. E.

(2001). Assessment of substance abuse: HIV risk assessment battery (RAB). In Carson-Dewitt

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of drugs, alcohol, and addictive behavior (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 148-150). New York, NY: Macmillan.

27.

Miller

W. R.

Rollnick

(2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

28.

Nuro

K. F.

Maccarelli

Martino

Ball

S. A.

Baker

S. M.

Rounsaville

B. J.

Carroll

K. M.

(2005). Yale Adherence and Competence Scale (YACSII) guidelines. West Haven, CT: Yale University Psychotherapy Development Center.

29.

Polcin

D. L.

(2006). What about sober living houses for parolees? Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 291-300. doi:10.1080/14786010600921712

30.

Polcin

D. L.

(2018). Role of recovery residences in criminal justice reform. International Journal of Drug Policy, 53, 32-36.

31.

Polcin

D. L.

Bond

Korcha

R. A.

Nayak

M. B.

Galloway

G. P.

Evans

(2014). Randomized trial of intensive motivational interviewing for methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 33, 253-265. doi:10.1080/10550887.2014.950029

32.

Polcin

D. L.

Korcha

R. A.

(2017). Housing status, psychiatric symptoms, and substance abuse outcomes among sober living house residents over 18 months. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 16, 138-150.

33.

Polcin

D. L.

Korcha

R. A.

Bond

Galloway

G. P.

(2010). Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 356-365.

34.

Polcin

D. L.

Korcha

R. A.

Mericle

A. A.

Mahoney

Hemberg

(2017). Problems and service needs among ex-offenders with HIV risk behaviors entering sober living recovery homes. Criminal Justice Studies, 30, 381-400. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2017.1357036

35.

Polcin

D. L.

Korcha

R. A.

Wittman

F. D.

Troutman

(2010, October 13). Sober living houses for offenders: Outcomes and barriers. Paper presented at the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Training Conference 2010, Sacramento, CA.

36.

Polcin

D. L.

Mericle

A. A.

Callahan

Harvey

Jason

L. A.

(2016). Challenges and rewards of conducting research on recovery residences for alcohol and drug disorders. Journal of Drug Issues, 46, 51-63. doi:10.1177/0022042615616432

37.

Porta

Bonet

Cove

(2007). Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 663-669.

38.

Porter

N. D.

(2017). State advances in criminal justice reform, 2016. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project. Retrieved from http://www.Webcitation.org/6nzHrLSwM

39.

Sentencing Project. (2016). Criminal justice facts. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/criminal-justice-facts/

40.

Sobell

L. C.

Sobell

M. B.

Buchan

Cleland

P. A.

Fedoroff

I. C.

Leo

G. I.

(1996, November 21–24). The reliability of the Timeline Followback method applied to drug, cigarette, and cannabis use. New York, NY: Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy.

41.

Walters

S. T.

Vader

A. M.

Nguyen

Harris

T. R.

Eells

(2010). Motivational interviewing as a supervision strategy in probation: A randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 309-323.

42.

Wittman

F. D.

Polcin

D. L.

(2014). The evolution of peer run sober housing as a recovery resource for California communities. International Journal of Self Help & Self Care, 8, 157-187.

43.

Zywiak

W. H.

Longabaugh

Wirtz

P. W.

(2002). Decomposing the relationships between pretreatment social network characteristics and alcohol treatment outcome. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 14-121.