Recidivism, and the factors related to it, remains a highly significant concern among juvenile justice researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. Recent studies highlight the need to examine multiple measures of recidivism as well as conduct multilevel analyses of this phenomenon. Using data collected in a National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-funded Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS) cooperative agreement, we examined individual- and site-level factors related to 1-year recidivism among probation youth in 20 sites in five states to answer research questions related to how recidivism rates differ across sites and the relationships between individual-level variables and a county-level concentrated disadvantage measure and recidivism. Our findings of large site differences in recidivism rates, and complex relationships between individual and county-level predictors of recidivism, highlight the need for more nuanced, contextually informed, multilevel approaches in studying recidivism among juveniles.
AalsmaM. C.WhiteL. M.LauK. S.PerkinsA.MonahanP.GrissoT. (2015). Behavioral health care needs, detention-based care, and criminal recidivism at community reentry from juvenile detention: A multisite survival curve analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 105(7), 1372–1378. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302529
2.
AttarB. K.GuerraN. G.TolanP. H. (1994). Neighborhood disadvantage, stressful life events, and adjustment in urban elementary-school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2304_5
BrowneW. J.LahiM. G.ParkerR. M. (2009). A guide to sample size calculations for random effect models via simulation and the mlpowsim software package. School of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol.
5.
ChauhanP.ReppucciN. D. (2009). The impact of neighborhood disadvantage and exposure to violence on self-report of antisocial behavior among girls in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9326-3
CottleC. C.LeeR. J.HeilbrunK. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854801028003005
CraigJ. M.BaglivioM. T.WolffK. T.PiqueroA. R.EppsN. (2017). Do social bonds buffer the impact of adverse childhood experiences on reoffending?Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016630033
DennisM. L.SmithC. N.BelenkoS.KnightD.McReynoldsL.RowanG.. . . WileyT. (2019). Operationalizing a behavioral health services cascade of care model: Lessons learned from a 33-site implementation in juvenile justice community supervision. Federal Probation, 83(2), 52–64.
12.
DonnellyE. A. (2017). The disproportionate minority contact mandate: An examination of its impacts on juvenile justice processing outcomes (1997-2011). Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(4), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415585139
13.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
14.
FinchW. H.BolinJ. E.KelleyK. (2014). Multilevel modeling using R. CRC Press.
15.
GrunwaldH. E.LockwoodB.HarrisP. W.MennisJ. (2010). Influences of neighborhood context, individual history and parenting behavior on recidivism among juvenile offenders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(9), 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9518-5
HarrisP.LockwoodB.MengersL.StoodleyB. H. (2011). Measuring recidivism in juvenile corrections. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 1(1), 1–16.
18.
HarrisP.MennisJ.ObradovicZ.IzenmanA. J.GrunwaldH. E. (2011). The coaction of neighborhood and individual effects on juvenile recidivism. Cityscape, 13(3), 33–55.
19.
HoeveM.McReynoldsL. S.WassermanG. A.McMillanC. (2013). The influence of mental health disorders on severity of reoffending in juveniles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812459639
20.
HoxJ. J.MoerbeekM.Van de SchootR. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
21.
HyattJ. M.BarnesG. C. (2017). An experimental evaluation of the impact of intensive supervision on the recidivism of high-risk probationers. Crime & Delinquency, 63(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714555757
22.
KakadeM.DuarteC. S.LiuX.FullerC. J.DruckerE.HovenC. W.. . . WuP. (2012). Adolescent substance use and other illegal behaviors and racial disparities in criminal justice system involvement: Findings from a US national survey. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1307–1310. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300699
23.
KalistD. E.LeeD. Y.SpurrS. J. (2015). Predicting recidivism of juvenile offenders. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 15(1), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2013-0188
24.
KirkD. S.SampsonR. J. (2013). Juvenile arrest and collateral educational damage in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712448862
25.
KnightD. K.BelenkoS.WileyT.RobertsonA. A.ArrigonaN.DennisM.. . . LeukefeldC. (2016). Juvenile justice—Translational research on interventions for adolescents in the legal system (JJ-TRIALS): A cluster randomized trial targeting system-wide improvement in substance use services. Implementation Science, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0423-5
26.
KubrinC. E.StewartE. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44(1), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00046.x
27.
LeBaronJ. (2002). Examining the relative influence of community context on juvenile offender post-confinement recidivism. Rutgers University.
28.
LeukefeldC. G.CawoodM.WileyT.RobertsonA. A.FisherJ. H.ArrigonaN.. . . MarksK. R. (2017). The benefits of community and juvenile justice involvement in organizational research. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 6(1), 112–124.
29.
LeversoJ.BielbyW.HoelterL. F. (2015). Back on the streets: Maturation and risk factors for recidivism among serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Adolescence, 41, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.02.008
30.
LowenkampC. T.MakariosM. D.LatessaE. J.LemkeR.SmithP. (2010). Community corrections facilities for juvenile offenders in Ohio: An examination of treatment integrity and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(6), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810363721
31.
LuongD.WormithJ. S. (2011). Applying risk/need assessment to probation practice and its impact on the recidivism of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1177–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811421596
32.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
33.
McReynoldsL. S.SchwalbeC. S.WassermanG. A. (2010). The contribution of psychiatric disorder to juvenile recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809354961
MulderE.BrandE.BullensR.Van MarleH. (2011). Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09356683
PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/449215
38.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
39.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 4, 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068
40.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
41.
SchubertC. A.MulveyE. P.GlasheenC. (2011). Influence of mental health and substance use problems and criminogenic risk on outcomes in serious juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(9), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.06.006
42.
SchweitzerM.LabrecqueR. M.SmithP. (2017). Reinvesting in the lives of youth: A targeted approach to reducing recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415579262
43.
ScottC. K.DennisM. L.GrellaC. E.FunkR. R.LurigioA. J. (2019). Juvenile justice systems of care: Results of a national survey of community supervision agencies and behavioral health providers on services provision and cross-system interactions. Health & Justice, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-019-0093-x
44.
SnijdersT. A.BoskerR. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE.
45.
SnyderH. N.SickmundM. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
46.
Stouthamer-LoeberM. (2010). Persistence and desistance in offending. University of Pittsburgh.
47.
SullivanC. J.LatessaE. (2011). The coproduction of outcomes: An integrated assessment of youth and program effects on recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204010393754
48.
TillyerM. S.VoseB. (2011). Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: A multilevel examination of main and moderating influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.08.003
49.
Van der PutC. E.CreemersH. E.HoeveM. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without substance use problems in the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for criminal recidivism. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 134, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.012
50.
Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice. (2018). Data resource guide: Fiscal year 2018.
51.
WelshB. C.LoeberR.StevensB. R.Stouthamer-LoeberM.CohenM. A.FarringtonD. P. (2008). Costs of juvenile crime in urban areas: A longitudinal perspective. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204007308427
52.
WeltyL. J.HershfieldJ. A.AbramK. M.HanH.ByckG. R.TeplinL. A. (2017). Trajectories of substance use disorder in youth after detention: A 12-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.10.018
53.
WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T.IntraviaJ.GreenwaldM. A.EppsN. (2017). The mobility of youth in the justice system: Implications for recidivism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1371–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0498-y
54.
WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T.IntraviaJ.PiqueroA. R. (2015). The protective impact of immigrant concentration on juvenile recidivism: A statewide analysis of youth offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.05.004
55.
WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T.PiqueroA. R. (2017). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and recidivism in a sample of juvenile offenders in community-based treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(11), 1210–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15613992
56.
WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T.PiqueroA. R.VaughnM. G.DeLisiM. (2016). The triple crown of antisocial behavior: Effortful control, negative emotionality, and community disadvantage. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204015599042
57.
WolffK. T.IntraviaJ.BaglivioM. T.PiqueroA. R. (2018). The protective impact of immigrant concentration on juvenile recidivism: A multilevel examination of potential mechanisms. Crime & Delinquency, 64(10), 1271–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717739608
58.
WoltmanH.FeldstainA.MacKayJ. C.RocchiM. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69.
59.
YanJ. (2009). A multidisciplinary study on juvenile recidivism and multilevel impacts: Risk factors, neighborhood features, and juvenile justice intervention [Unpublished thesis]. https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/6128
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
