For the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) to prevent sexual victimization in the correctional system, incarcerated persons and corrections staff must hold favorable views of this law, and behave in manners conducive toward its mission. In regards to behavior, both populations must report allegations of sexual misconduct, and be cautious in their interactions with one another. Currently, no study has researched whether these perceptual and behavioral expectations are being followed, or the factors influencing them. Mixed-methodological questionnaire data gathered from incarcerated persons (n = 490) and corrections staff (n = 222) who were in three state prisons located in the southeastern United States revealed how our custodial sample, compared to staff, were less likely to view PREA favorably, or to adopt behaviors supportive of this policy. Statistically significant correlates of self-reported behaviors included age, sex, and race. Discussion of results centers around ways of creating institutional cultures embracing of PREA.
BrewerR. (2021). Employee perceptions of servant leadership, trust, and employee commitment in a mid-Atlantic department of corrections [Doctoral dissertation]. Wilmington University.
3.
ButlerH. D.BouffardJ. A.BeattyJ. K.BouffardL. A. (2023). Understanding the decision to officially report sexual assaults in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(6), 849–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231162090
4.
Caravaca-SánchezF.AizpuruaE.WolffN. (2022). The prevalence of prison-based physical and sexual victimization in males and females: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(5), 3476–3492. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221130358
5.
CarrilloA. (2022). “PREA is a joke”: A case study of how trans PREA standards aren’t enforced. In BuistC.SemprevivoL (Eds.), Queering criminology in theory and praxis (pp. 70–82). Bristol University Press.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
7.
DavisA. J. (1968). Sexual assaults in the Philadelphia jail system and sheriff’s vans. In ScaccoA. M. (Ed.), Male rape: A casebook of sexual aggressions (pp. 107–120). AMS Press.
8.
DierendonckD. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2544
9.
EvansA. B.Barker-RuchtiN.BlackwellJ.ClayG.DowlingF.FrydendalS.Gliemann HybholtM.Hausken-SutterS. E.LenneisV.MalcolmD.PhoenixC.SmithB.NielsenC. S.WilcockL.WilliamsO.WintherH. (2021). Qualitative research in sports studies: Challenges, possibilities and the current state of play. European Journal for Sport and Society, 18(1), 1–17.
10.
FerdikF. (2023). Citizen satisfaction with the police and college-based informal social controls: An unexpected finding. Journal of Criminal Justice, 87, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102088
11.
FerdikF.PicaE. (2024). Correctional officer turnover intentions and mental illness symptom: Testing the potential confounding effects of resilience. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 30(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000384
12.
FerdikF.SmithH. P. (2016). Maximum security correctional officers: An exploratory investigation into their social bases of power. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 498–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9307-5
13.
FinnP. (2000). Addressing correctional officer stress: Programs and strategies. United States Department of Justice.
14.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Penguin.
15.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
16.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Sage.
17.
JennessV.SmythM. (2011). The passage and implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act: Legal endogeneity and the uncertain road from symbolic law to instrumental effects. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 22, 489.
18.
JohnsonB.GranheimP. K.HelgesenJ. (2011). Exceptional prison conditions and the quality of prison life: Prison size and prison culture in Norwegian closed prisons. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811413819
19.
KeenaL. D. (2006). Servant leadership in county jails: An examination of prisoners, faith-based volunteers, and jail administrators [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri-Columbia.
KingG.FarmerJ. (2009). What older people want: Evidence from a study of remote Scottish communities. Rural and Remote Health, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00205
22.
KrienertJ. L.WalshJ. A. (2023). When checking a box is not enough: The (un)readability of PREA messaging. The Prison Journal, 103(6), 728–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855231208008
23.
KubiakS. P.BrennerH.BybeeD.CampbellR.FedockG. (2018). Reporting sexual victimization during incarceration: Using ecological theory as a framework to inform and guide future research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016637078
24.
LedetR.HollandM. M.EmeighS.GivensS. (2024). Carceral safety in a post-PREA era: An examination of perceptual indicators of safety among incarcerated persons in four southeast prisons. Punishment & Society, 26(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231173927
25.
LockwoodD. (1980). Prison sexual violence. Elsevier.
26.
MalkinM. L.DeJongC. (2019). Protections for transgender inmates under PREA: A comparison of state correctional policies in the United States. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16, 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101855
27.
MarinerJ. (2001). No escape: Male rape in U.S. prisons. Human Rights Watch.
28.
MeyerK.WillisR. (2019). Looking back to move forward: The value of reflexive journaling for novice researchers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 62(5), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.36.1.0k5v52l12540w218
29.
MeyersA. R.HeerenT.HingsonR. (1989). Discretionary leniency in police enforcement of laws against drinking and driving: Two examples from the state of Maine, USA. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.02.003
30.
MillerK. L. (2010). The darkest figure of crime: Perceptions of reasons for male inmates to not report sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903292284
RudesD. S.MagnusonS.PortilloS.HatteryA. (2020). Sex logics: Negotiating the prison rape elimination act (PREA) against its administrative, safety, and cultural burdens. Punishment & Society, 23, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520952155
33.
SmithH. P. (2021). Evaluating the implementation of the prison rape elimination act (PREA): A “lessons learned” approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101855
34.
SmithH. P.FerdikF.DuntonC.BolajiQ. (2023). An assessment of the knowledge, support, and behavior surrounding the implementation of the prison rape elimination Act. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(7), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231164966
35.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD. (2006). A comparison of sexual coercion experiences reported by men and women in prison. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1591–1615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506294240
