Despite recent reforms limiting or eliminating cash bail for less serious crimes, we know little about public support for pretrial detention. To help fill this gap, we embedded offense severity experimental manipulations within a national survey administered to 1,368 Americans. While liberals are significantly less likely than conservatives to support pretrial detention in the abstract, these ideological differences largely disappear once offense severity is considered. Support for pretrial detention is significantly lower for misdemeanors versus felonies, non-violent versus violent crimes, and less versus more serious crimes (shoplifting/drug possession vs. robbery/homicide). These offense severity effects hold for respondents across the political spectrum, revealing broad bifurcated support for pretrial detention across more serious versus less serious crimes that align with recent bail reforms targeting less serious crimes. The convergence of decreased support for pretrial detention in less serious cases among conservatives and liberals offers a unique opportunity for bi-partisan bail reform.
BaughmanS. B. (2017). Costs of pretrial detention. Boston University Law Review, 97(1), 1–30.
4.
BaughmanS. B. (2019). Dividing bail reform. Iowa Law Review, 105(3), 947–1025.
5.
BaughmanS. B.BooneL.JacksonN. (2021). Reforming state bail reform. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 74(3), 447–474.
6.
BeckettK.ReostiA.KnaphusE. (2016). The end of an era? Understanding the contradictions of criminal justice reform. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 664(1), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215598973
BurtonA. L.BurtonV. S.Jr.CullenF. T.PickettJ. T.ButlerL. C.ThieloA. J. (2020). Beyond the New Jim Crow: Public support for removing and regulating collateral consequences. Federal Probation, 84(3), 19–59.
10.
BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.BurtonV. S.Jr.GrahamA.ButlerL. C.ThieloA. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
11.
BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.PickettJ. T.BurtonV. S.Jr.ThieloA. J. (2021). Beyond the eternal criminal record: Public support for expungement. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(1), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12531
HannanK. R.CullenF. T.GrahamA.JonsonC. L.PickettJ. T.HanerM.SloanM. M. (2023). Public support for second look sentencing: Is there a Shawshank redemption effect?Criminology & Public Policy, 22(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12616
20.
HardcastleL.BartholomewT.GraffamJ. (2011). Legislative and community support for offender reintegration in Victoria. Deakin Law Review, 16(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2011vol16no1art96
JohnsonL. D. (2015). The politics of the bail system: What’s the price for freedom. The Scholar, 17(2), 171–218.
24.
JohnsonL. M.ElamP.LeboldS. M.BurroughsR. (2018). Use of research evidence by criminal justice professionals. Justice Policy Journal, 16(2), 1–23.
25.
JorgensenI.SmithS. S. (2021). The current state of bail reform in the United States: Results of a landscape analysis of bail reforms across all 50 states (Working Paper No. RWP21-033). Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
26.
KincaidJ. R. (1998). Erotic innocence: The culture of child molesting. Duke University Press.
27.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. University of Chicago Press.
28.
LanuzaY. R.PetersenN.OmoriM. (2023). Colorism in punishment among Hispanics in the criminal justice system. Social Problems, 70(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab044
29.
LeeH.CullenF. T.BurtonA. L.BurtonV. S.Jr. (2022). Millennials as the future of corrections: A generational analysis of public policy opinions. Crime & Delinquency, 68(12), 2355–2392. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211022610
30.
LehmannP. S.PickettJ. T.RyonS. B.KosloskiA. E. (2019). Race, juvenile transfer, and sentencing preferences: Findings from a randomized experiment. Race and Justice, 9(3), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717699674
MartinezB. P.PetersenN.OmoriM. (2020). Time, money, and punishment: Institutional racial-ethnic inequalities in pretrial detention and case outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6-7), 837–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719881600
33.
MarunaS.KingA. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal? ‘Redeemability’and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1–2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9088-1
34.
MetcalfeC.PickettJ. T. (2022). Public fear of protesters and support for protest policing: An experimental test of two theoretical models. Criminology, 60(1), 60–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12291
35.
O’HearM.WheelockD. (2019). Violent crime and punitiveness: An empirical study of public opinion. Marquette Law Review, 103(3), 1035.
36.
OmoriM.PetersenN. (2020). Institutionalizing inequality in the courts: Decomposing racial and ethnic disparities in detention, conviction, and sentencing. Criminology, 58(4), 678–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12257
37.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
38.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
39.
PeerE.RothschildD.GordonA.EverndenZ.DamerE. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
40.
PetersenN. (2019). Low-level, but high speed? Assessing pretrial detention effects on the timing and content of misdemeanor versus felony guilty pleas. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1314–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1639791
41.
PetersenN. (2020). Do detainees plead guilty faster? A survival analysis of pretrial detention and the timing of guilty pleas. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(7), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419838020
42.
PetersenN.OmoriM. (2020). Is the process the only punishment? Racial–ethnic disparities in lower-level courts. Law & Policy, 42(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12140
PickettJ. T.BakerT. (2014). The pragmatic American: Empirical reality or methodological artifact?Criminology, 52(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12035
47.
Princeton Survey Research Associates International. (2007). The NCSC sentencing attitudes survey: A report on the findings. Indiana Law Journal, 82(5), Article 14.
48.
RadeC. B.DesmaraisS. L.MitchellR. E. (2016). A meta-analysis of public attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816655837
RogersP.HirstL.DaviesM. (2011). An investigation into the effect of respondent gender, victim age, and perpetrator treatment on public attitudes towards sex offenders, sex offender treatment, and sex offender rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(8), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.602472
52.
SeedsC. (2017). Bifurcation nation: American penal policy in late mass incarceration. Punishment & Society, 19(5), 590–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516673822
53.
SimonsonJ. (2016). Bail nullification. Michigan Law Review, 115(5), 585–638.
54.
St. LouisS. (2024). The pretrial detention penalty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pretrial detention and case outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 41(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2023.2193624
55.
St. LouisS.PetersenN. (2024). Political ideology and attitudes toward pretrial justice: Exploring the mediating role of racial resentment. Justice Quarterly, 1–24. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2024.2361719
56.
TangJ.BirrellE.LernerA. (2022). Replication: How well do my results generalize now? The external validity of online privacy and security surveys [Conference session]. Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, Boston, MA.
57.
WuE.Gagnon-BartschJ. A. (2018). The LOOP estimator: Adjusting for covariates in randomized experiments. Evaluation Review, 42(4), 458–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X18808003
58.
WuS.McDowallD. (2023). Does bail reform increase crime in New York State: Evidence from interrupted time-series analyses and synthetic control methods. Justice Quarterly, 41(3), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2023.2209145
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
