For too long military cohesion scholars have focused on regular infantry forces. This article examines the impact of the Future Reserves 2020 (FR20) policy on cohesion, professionalism, and discipline among British reserve logisticians. In doing so, it makes three significant contributions to the cohesion literature. Firstly, addressing scholars’ almost exclusive focus on regular infantry, it presents the first academic study on cohesion in British reserve logistics forces. Secondly, in detailing how cohesion in these forces is based on interpersonal rather than professional bonds, it argues that the locus of cohesion and discipline in these forces is different to that recently identified in the regular professional infantry. Thirdly, the article argues that while FR20 is gradually changing many of British reserve norms, the organizational realities of reserve service continue to limit the policy's impact. The evidence presented may be theoretically applicable to other reserve and noncombat forces in future cohesion research.
BancroftA. (2009). Drugs, intoxication and society. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
3.
BeckettI. (2008). Territorials: A century of service. Plymouth, England: DRA.
4.
Ben-AriE.Lomksy-FederE. (2011). Epilogue: Theoretical and comparative notes on reserve forces. Armed Forces and Society, 37, 361–371.
5.
Ben-ShalomU.LehrerZ.Ben-AriE. (2005). Cohesion during military operations: A field study on combat units in the Al-Aqsa Intifada. Armed Forces and Society, 32, 63–79.
BuryP. (2016b). Barossa night: Cohesion in the British Army officer corps. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, 314–335.
8.
BuryP. (2016c). The transformation of the army reserve: The origins, evolution, and impact of Future Reserves 2020 on reserve logistics (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Exeter: Exeter
9.
BuryP.KingA. (2015). A profession of love? Cohesion in a British platoon in Afghanistan. In KingA. (Ed.), Frontline: Combat and cohesion in the twenty-first century (pp. 200–216), Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
ConnellyV. (2013) Cultural differences between the regular army and AR as barriers to integration. Unpublished paper prepared for Director, Personnel, Ministry of Defence.
11.
DandekerC.GreenbergN.OrmeG. (2011). The UK’s reserve forces: Retrospect and prospect. Armed Forces and Society, 37, 341–360.
12.
EdmundsT.DawesA.HigateP.JenkinsN.WoodwardR. (2016). Reserve forces and the transformation of British military organisation: Soldiers, citizens and society. Defence Studies, 16, 118–136.
13.
FestingerL.BackK.SchacterS. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York, NY: Harper.
14.
GalR. (1986). Unit Morale: From a theoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration—An Israeli example. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 549–564.
15.
GriffithJ. (1988). Measurement of group cohesion in U.S. Army units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 2.
16.
GriffithJ. (2009a). After 9/11 what kind of reserve soldier. Armed Forces and Society, 35, 214–240.
17.
GriffithJ. (2009b). Being a reserve soldier: A matter of social identity. Armed Forces and Society, 36, 38–64.
18.
GriffithJ. (2011). Contradictory and complementary identities of US Army reservists: A historical perspective. Armed Forces and Society, 37, 261–283.
19.
KingA. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces and Society, 32, 493–512.
20.
KingA. (2007). The existence of group cohesion in the armed forces. Armed Forces and Society, 33, 638–645.
21.
KingA. (2013). The combat soldier. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22.
KingA. (2015). Discipline and punish: Encouraging combat performance in the citizen and professional army. In KingA. (Ed.), Frontline: Combat and cohesion in the twenty-first century (pp. 93–119). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23.
KingA. (2016). On combat effectiveness in the infantry platoon: Beyond the primary group thesis. Security Studies, 25, 699–728.
24.
KirkeC. (2008). Issues in integrating territorial army soldiers into regular British units for operations: A regular view. Defense and Security Analysis, 24, 181–195.
25.
Lomsky-FederE.GazitN.Ben AriE. (2008). Reserve soldiers as transmigrants: Moving between the civilian and military worlds. Armed Forces and Society, 34, 593–614.
26.
MacCounR.HixW. (2010). Cohesion and performance. In National Defense Institute (Eds.), Sexual orientation and U.S. military policy: An update of RAND’s 1993 study (pp. 137–158). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
27.
MacCounR.KierE.BelkinA. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat?Armed Forces and Society, 32, 646–654.
28.
Ministry of Defence. (2013). Future reserves 2020: Valuable and valued (White Paper). London, England: HMSO.
29.
ShilsE.JanowitzM. (1948, Summer). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 280–315.
30.
SieboldG. (1996). Small unit dynamics: Leadership, cohesion, motivation, and morale. In PhelpsR.FarrB. (Eds.), Reserve component soldiers as peacekeepers (pp. 237–286). Virginia: U.S. Army Research Institute.
31.
SieboldG. (2007). The essence of military cohesion. Armed Forces and Society, 33, 286–295.
32.
SieboldG. (2012). The science of military cohesion. In SaloM.SinkkoR. (Eds.), The science of unit cohesion—Its characteristics and impacts (pp. 45–64). Tampere, Finland: Finnish National Defence University.
33.
SieboldG.CrabT.WoodwardR.KingA. (2016). Combat, cohesion, and controversy—Disputatio sine fine. Armed Forces and Society, 42, 449–462.
34.
SieboldG.KellyD. (1988). The development of the platoon cohesion index. Washington, DC: Army Research Institute.
35.
SionL.Ben-AriE. (2005). Hungry, Weary and Horny: Joking and jesting among Israel’s combat reserves. Israel Affairs, 11, 655–671.
36.
StoufferS.LumsdaineA.HarperM.LumsdaineR.WilliamsJ.Brewster SmithM.…CottrellL. (1949). The American soldier: Combat and its aftermath. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
StrachanH. (2006). Training, morale and modern war. Journal of Contemporary History, 41, 211–227.
38.
ThornborrowT.BrownA. (2009). Being regimented: Aspiration and identity work in the British parachute regiment. Organization Studies, 30, 355–376.
39.
VestB. (2013). Citizen, soldier, or citizen-soldier? Negotiating identity in the US national guard. Armed Forces and Society, 39, 602–627.
40.
WalkerW. (1990). Reserve forces and the British territorial army. London, England: Tri-Services.
41.
WeberC. (2011). The French military reserve: Real or abstract force?Armed Forces and Society, 37, 321–340.
42.
WinslowD. (1999). Rites of passage and group bonding in the Canadian airborne. Armed Forces and Society, 25, 429–457.
43.
WongL.KoldtizT.MillemR.PotterT. (2003). Why they fight: Combat motivation in the Iraq War. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
44.
ZurcherL. (1965). The sailor aboard ship: A study of role behaviour in a total institution. Social Forces, 43, 389–400.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
