Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Scholars have contended that norms of professionalism are critical to understanding how militaries interact with civilian leaders and when they intervene in politics. Yet, few studies have directly examined the normative structures of military officers. Through a survey of 1468 US Military Academy cadets, this study evaluates cadets’ views toward professionalism, and in particular what is often presumed to be the dominant framework of those norms based on Samuel Huntington’s The Soldier and the State. We identify five patterns of normative beliefs based on cadets’ views of civil–military interaction and the nonpartisan ethic: orthodox, unorthodox, inconsistent, non-committal, and motivated norms. Cadets fall into each of these categories, but approximately one-quarter demonstrate motivated norms, adhering when convenient, and otherwise dispensing with them when the rules they prescribe clash with their partisan identities. These findings, especially our novel conceptualization on norm adherence, contribute to a greater understanding of military culture and professionalism.

Keywords

military culture professionalism/leadership civil–military relations military effectiveness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahamsson

(1972). Military professionalization and political power. Sage Publications.

Ackerman

. (2016, September 16). What to make of military endorsements? The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-to-make-of-military-endorsements

Babcock-Lumish

(2013). Uninformed, not uniformed? The apolitical myth (p. 48-56). Military Review, (September/October).

Bacevich

Kohn

(1997, December 8). Grand army of the Republicans: Has the U.S. military become a partisan force? New Republic, 57, 22-25.

Bartels

(2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 133.

Böhmelt

Escribà-Folch

Pilster

(2018). Pitfalls of professionalism? Military academies and coup risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(5), 1111-1139.

Brooks

(2020). Paradoxes of professionalism: Rethinking U.S. civil-military relations. International Security, 44(4), 7-44.

Brooks

(2012). Thought cloud:the real problem with the civilian-military gap. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/08/02/thought-cloud

Brotz

Wilson

(1946). Characteristics of military society. American Journal of Sociology, 51(5), 371-375.

10.

Brueneau

(2013). Impediments to the accurate conceptualization of civil-military relations. In Bruneau

T. C.

Matei

F. C.

(Eds.), The routledge handbook of civil-military relations (pp. 13-21). Routledge.

11.

Campbell

Converse

Miller

Stokes

D. E.

(1980). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.

12.

Canter

. (2020, July 1). Generals are people too: And their involvement in politics is part of the American tradition. Real clear defense. https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2020/07/01/generals _are_people_too__and_their_involvement_in_politics_is_part_of_the_american_tradition_115429.html

13.

Checkel

J. T.

(2017). Socialization and violence. Journal of Peace Research, 54(5), 592-605.

14.

Cohen

(2002). Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen and leadership in wartime. Simon and Schuster.

15.

Davidson

(2013). The contemporary presidency: Civil-military friction and presidential decision making: Explaining the broken Dialogue. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 129-145.

16.

Deitelhoff

Zimmerman

(2019). Norms under challenge: Unpacking the dynamics of norm robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 6.

17.

Dempsey

(2010). Our army: Soldiers, politics, and American civil-military relations (pp. 70-126). Princeton University Press.

18.

Dempsey

(2016, July 30). Military leaders do not belong at political conventions. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/military-leaders-do-not-belong-at-political-conventions/2016/07/30/0e06fc16-568b-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_story.html

19.

Dornbusch

S. M.

(1955). The military academy as an assimilating institution. Social Forces, 33(4), 316-321.

20.

Farrell

(2005). World culture and military power. Security Studies, 14(3), 448-488.

21.

Farrell

Terriff

(2002). The sources of military change. In Terriff

Farrell

Terriff

(Eds.), The sources of military change: Culture, politics, technology (pp. 3-20). Lynne Rienner.

22.

Feaver

(2003). Armed servants. Harvard University Press.

23.

Feaver

(2016, July 29). We don’t need generals to become cheerleaders at political conventions. Foreign policy . https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/29/we-dont-need-generals-to-become-cheerleaders-at-political-conventions/

24.

Feaver

Kohn

(Eds.), (2001). Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American national security. MIT Press.

25.

Finnemore

(1996). National interests in international society. Cornell University Press.

26.

Finnemore

Sikkink

(1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917.

27.

Finney

Mayfield

(Eds.), (2018). Redefining the modern military: The intersection of profession and ethics. Naval Institute Press.

28.

Garamone

(2014, January 28). Dempsey to evaluate profession of arms campaign. American Forces Press Service. https://www.jcs.mil/Media/News/News-Display/Article/571631/dempsey-to-evaluate-profession-of-arms-campaign/

29.

Golby

Cohn

Feaver

(2016). Thanks for your service. In Schake

Mattis

(Eds.), Warriors & citizens: American views of our military (p. 117). Hoover Institution Press.

30.

Golby

Karlin

(2018). Why “best military advice” is bad for the military-And worse for civilians. Orbis, 62(1), 137-153.

31.

Hammill

Segal

(1995). Self-selection and parental socioeconomic status as determinants of the values of West Point cadets. Armed Forces & Society, 22(1), 113.

32.

Holsti

(2001). Of chasms and convergences: Attitudes and beliefs of civilians and military elites at the start of a new millennium. In Feaver

P. D.

Kohn

R. H.

(Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military Gap and American national security (p. 83). MIT Press.

33.

Hoover Green

(2016). The commander’s Dilemma: Creating and controlling armed group violence. Journal of Peace Research, 53(5), 621.

34.

Horton

(2020, August 19). Army is investigating soldiers who appeared in democratic convention video. Washington Post.

35.

Hunt Friend

Karlin

(2020, May 29). Towards a concept of good civilian guidance,” war on the Rocks. War on the Rocks . https://warontherocks.com/2020/05/towards-a-concept-of-good-civilian-guidance/

36.

Janowitz

(1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Free Press.

37.

Katzenstein

(1996). Introduction: Alternative perspectives on national security. In Katzenstein

P. J.

(Ed.), The culture of national security norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.

38.

Kelty

Kleykamp

Segal

(2010). The military and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 181-207.

39.

Kier

(1997). Imagining war: French and British military doctrine between the wars. Princeton University Press.

40.

Klotz

(1995). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Cornell University Press.

41.

Kohn

(1994). Out of control: The Crisis in civil-military relations (Vol. 3). The National Interest, (Spring).

42.

Legro

J. W.

(1997). Which norms matter? Revisiting the “Failure” of internationalism. International Organization, 51(1), 31-63.

43.

Legros

Cislaghi

(2020). Mapping the social-norms literature: An overview of reviews. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 62-80.

44.

Lord

(2015). On military professionalism and civilian control. Joint Force Quarterly, 78, 70-74.

45.

Macias

Mangan

(2020, June 20). Joint Chiefs of staff chairman Milley apologizes for appearing with Trump at church photo-op. CNBC . https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/11/george-floyd-joint-chiefs-chairman-milley-apologizes-for-appearing-with-trump.html.

46.

Marshall

(2000). Men against fire: The problem of battle command. University of Oklahoma Press.

47.

Moskos

C. C.

(1975). The American Combat Soldier in Vietnam. Journal of Social Issues, 31(4), 25-37.

48.

National Defense University (2020). Civ-mil relations Prep, CAPSTONE: General and flag officer course. Retrieved from https://capstone.ndu.edu/Portals/83/204CivMil.pdf

49.

Nix

(2012). American civil-military relations: Samuel P. Huntington and the political dimensions of military professionalism. Naval War College Review, 65(2), 88-104.

50.

Norden

(1990). Democratic consolidation and military professionalism: Argentina in the 1980s. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 32(3), 154.

51.

Owens

(2015). Military officers: Political without partisanship. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9(3), 92.

52.

Price

(1995). A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo. International Organization, 49(1), 73-103.

53.

Ralston

Krebs

Rapport

(2021). No right to Be wrong: what Americans think about civil-military relations. Perspectives on Politics, 11 March.

54.

Rapp

(2015). Civil-military relations: The role of military leaders in strategy making. Parameters, 45(3), 13.

55.

Raymond

(1997). Neutrality norms and the balance of power. Cooperation and Conflict, 32(2), 128.

56.

Ricks

(1997, July). The widening Gap between the military and society. The Atlantic Monthly, 23, 67-78.

57.

Sandholtz

(2008). Dynamics of International norm change: rules against wartime plunder. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 101-131.

58.

Sandholtz

(2019). Norm contestation, robustness, and replacement. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 143-146.

59.

Sandholtz

Stiles

(2008). International norms and cycles of change. Oxford University Press.

60.

Savage

J. D.

Caverley

J. D.

(2017). When human capital threatens the capitol. Journal of Peace Research, 54(4), 542-557.

61.

Shulimson

(1996). Military professionalism: The case of the U.S. Marine officer corps, 1880-1898. The Journal of Military History, 60(2), 231-242.

62.

Snider

(2002). The U.S. army as profession. In Matthews

L. J.

Snider

D. M.

(Eds.), The future of the Army as a profession (p. 14). McGraw-Hill.

63.

Snider

(2015). Will army 2025 be a military profession? Parameters, 45(4), 39-51.

64.

Snider

(2016). Five myths about our future. Parameters, 46(3), 52.

65.

Snider

Priest

Lewis

(2001). The civilian-military Gap and professional military education at the precommissioning level. Armed Forces & Society, 27(2), 251-253.

66.

Sondheimer

R. M.

Toner

Wilson

(2012). Cadet perceptions of military and civilian ideology. Armed Forces & Society, 39(1), 124-134.

67.

Stiehm

(2001). Civil-military relations in war college curricula. Armed Forces & Society, 27(2), 291.

68.

Taber

C. S.

Lodge

(2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.

69.

Urben

(2010). Civil‐military relations in a time of war: Party, politics, and the profession of arms. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.

70.

Urben

(2014). Wearing politics on our sleeves? Levels of political activism of active duty Army officers. Armed Forces & Society, 40(4), 568-591.

71.

Urben

(2017). Like, comment, retweet: The state of the military’s nonpartisan ethic in the world of social media. NDU Press.

72.

U.S. Army War College (2018a). Theory of War and Strategy [syllabus]. Department of National Security and Strategy.

73.

U.S. Army War College (2018b). National security Policy and strategy [syllabus]. Department of National Security and Strategy.

74.

Zaller

(1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.

75.

Zhao

(2019, May 28). U.S. service members may have violated DoD rules by wearing MAGA-inspired patches at trump memorial day address. Newsweek.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.17 MB

0.00 MB