In this article, the authors argue the need to go beyond the idea of reflective public administration to reflexive public administration. They explore the meaning of reflexivity, in particular self-and critical reflexivity, and suggest that reflexive practice is crucial to public administration because it can lead to more critical, responsible, and ethical actions. This can provide a basis for organizational transformation. The article concludes by offering a number of resources for teaching self-and critical reflexivity.
Adams, G. B., & Balfour, D. L. (1998). Unmasking administrative evil. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17, 432-464.
3.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1996). Making sense of management: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
4.
Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69, 99-109.
5.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting a sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
8.
Boje, D. M. (1994). Organizational storytelling: The struggles of pre-modern, modern and postmodern organizational learning discourses. Management Learning, 25, 433-461.
9.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Into other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
11.
Chia, R. (1996). The problem of reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization. Organization, 3, 31-59.
12.
Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1-26) Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Cooper, R. (1989). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 10, 479-502.
14.
Cooper, R. (1990). Organization/disorganization. In J. Hassard & D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations (pp. 167-197). London: Routledge.
15.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2001). Managers as practical authors: Reconstructing our understanding of management practice. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 351-371.
16.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33, 35-61.
17.
Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtue: Rights, citizenship, and republican liberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
Deetz, S. (1995a). Character, corporate responsibility and the dialogic in the postmodern context: A commentary on Mangham. Organization, 2, 217-225.
19.
Deetz, S. (1995b). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsible and responsive workplaces. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
20.
Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
21.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
22.
Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
23.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge.
24.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
25.
Foucault, M. (1974). In Elders, F. (Ed.) Reflexive water: The basic concerns of mankind. London: Souvenir.
26.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
27.
Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.
28.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
31.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections fromthe prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
32.
Greenwood, D. J., & Morton, L. (1998). Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1, T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
35.
Harmon, M. M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
36.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Tran. by J. MacQuarrie and E. Robinson. London: SCM Press.
37.
Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on thinking: A translation of gelassenheit by J. M. Anderson & E. Hans Freund. New York: Harper & Row.
38.
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Janis, I. (1972). Groupthink: Psychological studies in policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
Jun, J. S. (1994). Philosophy of administration. Seoul, Korea: Daeyoung Moonhwa International.
41.
Jun, J. S. (1997). Interpretive and critical perspectives: An introduction. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 19, 146-153.
42.
Jun, J. S. (1998). Reflexivity in theory and practice. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 20, 123-124.
43.
Jun, J. S. (1999). The need for autonomy and virtues: Civic-minded administrators in a civil society. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 21, 218-226.
44.
Kafka, F. (1948). The trial (W. Muir & E. Muir, Trans.). New York: Knopf.
45.
Kafka, F. (1951). The castle. With an introduction by T. Nann. Trans. by E. and W. Muir. New York: A. A. Knopf.
46.
Kiros, T. (1998). Self-construction and the formation of human values: Truth, language, and desire. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
47.
Lash, S. (1993). Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural economy and social change. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 193-211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Latour, B. (1988). The politics of explanation: An alternative. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 155-176). London: Sage.
49.
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
50.
Lawson, H. (1985). Reflexivity: The postmodern predicament. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
51.
Lyotard, J. F. (1992). The postmodern explained. Ann Arbor: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
53.
Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1, 339-359.
54.
McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: Adiscourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56.
Pollner, M. (1991). Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56, 370-380.
57.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
58.
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
59.
Shotter, J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Managers as practical authors: Everyday conversations for action. In D. Holman & R. Thorpe (Eds.), Management and language: The manager as practical author (pp. 15-37). London: Sage.
60.
Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Townley, B. (1994). Reframing human resource management: Power, ethics, and the subject at work. London: Sage.
63.
Watson, T. (1994). In search of management: Culture, chaos and control in managerial work. London: Routledge.
64.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
65.
Woolgar, S. (Ed.). (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.
