While material gain continues to be a leading motivator for corrupt acts, this study shows that social status and kinship responsibilities should also be considered possible precursors to corruption. This finding has important implications for constructing an appropriate understanding of corruption, designing anticorruption policies, and achieving ethical governance in developing democracies.
AcemogluD.VerdierT. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90, 194-211.
2.
AidtT. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: A survey. Economic Journal, 113, F632-F652.
3.
AkçayS. (2006).Corruption and human development. Cato Journal, 26, 29-48.
4.
AlemannU. (2004). The unknown depths of political theory: The case for a multidimensional concept of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 42, 25-34.
5.
AshforthB. E.AnandV. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-52.
BayleyD. (1966). The effects of corruption in a developing nation. Western Political Quarterly, 19, 719-732.
8.
BrovkinV. (2003). Corruption in the 20th century Russia. Crime, Law and Social Change, 40, 195-230.
9.
de GraafG.HubertsL. W. J. C. (2008). Portraying the nature of corruption using an explorative case study design. Public Administration Review, 68, 640-653.
10.
DoigA. (2011). Numbers, words and KYC: Knowing your country and knowing your corruption. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7, 142-158.
11.
EarleB. (2000). Bribery and corruption in Eastern Europe, the Baltic states, and the Commonwealth of Independent States: What is to be done?Cornell International Law Journal, 33, 483-513.
12.
ErmannM. D.LundmanR. J. (2002). Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
FijnautC.HubertsL. W. J. C. (Eds.). (2002). Corruption, integrity and law enforcement. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
14.
FishmanR.GattiR. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 325-345.
15.
Forgues-PuccioG.BlackburnK. (2010). Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, 1321-1339.
16.
GrødelandA. (2010). Elite perceptions of anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine. Global Crime, 11, 237-260.
17.
GundlachE.PaldamM. (2009). The transition of corruption: From poverty to honesty. Economics Letters, 103, 146-148.
18.
HaberfeldM. R.IvkovicS.KlockarsC. (2006). Enhancing police integrity. AA Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
HeidenheimerA. J. (2004). Disjunctions between corruption and democracy? A qualitative exploration. Crime, Law and Social Change, 42, 99-109.
21.
HofstedeG. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
HofstedeG. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
HubertsL. W. J. C.NelenJ. M. (2005). Corruptie in het Nederlandse openbaar bestuur: Omvang, aard en afdoening [Corruption in government in the Netherlands: Extent, nature and prosecution]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.
24.
IvkovicS.ShelleyT. O. (2010). The code of silence and disciplinary fairness. Policing, 33, 548-574.
25.
JainA. K. (1998). Economics of corruption. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
JainA. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 71-121.
27.
JohnstonM. (2001). The definitions debate: Good politics, governance, and the concept of corruption. In AvringJ. K. (Ed.), Political economy of corruption (pp. 11-32). London, England: Routledge.
28.
KaluK. (2003). Entrepreneurs or conservators? Contractarian principles of bureaucratic performance. Administration & Society, 35, 539-563.
29.
KarklinsR. (2005). The system made me do it: Corruption in post-communist societies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
30.
KingdonJ. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York, NY: Longman.
31.
KopitsG.CraigJ. D. (1998). Transparency in government operations. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
32.
LedenevaA. (2009). From Russia with blat: Can informal networks help modernize Russia?Social Research, 76, 257-288.
33.
LeffN. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14.
34.
LeysC. (1965). What is the problem about corruption?Journal of Modern African Studies, 3, 215-230.
35.
LuiF. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 760-781.
36.
MarkovskaA.IsaevaA. (2007). Public sector corruption: Lessons to be learned from the Ukrainian experience. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 9, 118-129.
37.
MarkovskayaA.PridemoreW.NakajimaC. (2003). Laws without teeth: An overview of the problems associated with corruption in Ukraine. Crime, Law and Social Change, 39, 193-213.
38.
MenzelD. (2009). In pursuit of ethical governance: New approaches are emerging to fight corruption, including the use of measurement tools. Public Manager, 38(2), 30-35.
TreismanD. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399-457.
56.
TumarkinN. (2000). Russia’s moral rearmament. Wilson Quarterly, 24(2), 48-49.
57.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
UslanerE. M.ConleyR. S. (2003). Civic engagement and particularized trust: The ties that bind people to their ethnic communities. American Politics Research, 31, 331-360.
59.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (RothG.WittichC., Ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.