This study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of e-government innovation initiatives focusing on public services and administration. Our SLR included 704 peer-reviewed studies published in scientific journals between 2000 and 2019. The final sample comprised 70 studies that were read fully, from which we identified four distinct cluster themes and objectives. We then classified them into four clusters, representing an evolutionary view with different stages of e-government initiatives. Further, the study pointed out themes and initiatives to drive future research agendas in e-government.
AnthopoulosL.ReddickC. G.GiannakidouI.MavridisN. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003
2.
ArduiniD.DenniM.LuccheseM.NurraA.ZanfeiA. (2013). The role of technology, organization and contextual factors in the development of e-government services, an empirical analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.007
3.
BekkersV. (2012). Why does e-government look as it does? Looking beyond the explanatory emptiness of the e-government concept. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-2012-0279
4.
BekkersV.HomburgV. (2007). The myths of e-government, looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society, 23(5), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701572913
5.
BertotJ. C.JaegerP. T.GorhamU.TaylorN. G.LincolnR. (2013). Delivering e-government services and transforming communities through innovative partnerships, public libraries government agencies and community organizations. Information Polity, 18(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-130304
6.
Beynon-DaviesP. (2005). Constructing electronic government, the case of the UK inland revenue. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.08.002
7.
BinduN.SankarC. P.KumarK. S. (2019). From conventional governance to e-democracy: Tracing the evolution of e-governance research trends using network analysis tools. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.005
8.
BingL.AkintoyeA.EdwardsP.HardcastleC. (2005). The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.006
9.
BonsónE.RoyoS.RatkaiM. (2017). Facebook practices in Western European municipalities: An empirical analysis of activity and citizens’ engagement. Administration & Society, 49(3), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714544945
10.
BoyerE. J.SchellerD. S. (2018). An examination of state-level public–private partnership adoption: Analyzing economic, political, and demand-related determinants of PPPs. Public Works Management & Policy, 23(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x17729097
11.
BrainardL. A.McNuttJ. G. (2010). Virtual government–citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative?Administration & Society, 42(7), 836–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710386308
CarterL.BélangerF. (2005). The utilization of e-government services, citizen trust innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
14.
Cegarra-NavarroJ. G.PachónJ. R. C.CegarraJ. L. M. (2012). E-government and citizens engagement with local affairs through e-websites, the case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management, 32(5), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.008
15.
ChungC. (2020). Developing digital governance: South Korea as a global digital government leader. Routledge.
16.
CiborraC. U. (2009). Interpreting e-government and development, efficiency transparency or governance at a distance? In Bricolage, care and information. Technology, work and globalization (pp. 90–110). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250611_5
CriadoJ. I.Sandoval-AlmazanR.Gil-GarciaJ. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
19.
CunninghamA.PhillipsM. (2005). Accountability and accessibility: Ensuring the evidence of e-governance in Australia. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57(4), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530510612059
DemirciogluM. A.ChenC.-A. (2019). Public employees’ use of social media: Its impact on need satisfaction and intrinsic work motivation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.008
23.
DesouzaK. C.JacobB. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration & Society, 49(7), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555751
24.
DwivediY. K.SahuG. P.RanaN. P.SinghM.ChandwaniR. K. (2016). Common Services Centres (CSCs). As an approach to bridge the digital divide. Transforming Government, People Process and Policy, 10(4), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-01-2016-0006
25.
EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2009). Software survey, VOSviewer a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
FeeneyM. K.BrownA. (2017). Are small cities online? Content, ranking, and variation of U.S. municipal websites. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.10.005
29.
FerroE.LoukisE. N.CharalabidisY.OsellaM. (2013). Policy making 2.0, from theory to practice. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.018
30.
FinkA. (1998). Conducting research literature reviews, from paper to the internet. SAGE Publications.
31.
FusiF.FeeneyM. K. (2016). Social media in the workplace: Information exchange, productivity, or waste?The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016675722
32.
GaoX.LeeJ. (2017). E-government services and social media adoption, experience of small local governments in Nebraska state. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.005
Gil-GarcíaJ. R.PardoT. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
35.
GoreA. (1993). Reengineering through information technology: Accompanying report of the National Performance Review. U.S. Government Printing Office.
36.
GronlundA. (2002). Electronic government design, applications and Management. Idea Group Pub.
37.
GronlundA.HoranT. A. (2004). Introducing e-gov: History, definitions, and issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 713–729. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01539
38.
GulatiG. J.WilliamsC. B.YatesD. J. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation, a cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005
39.
HartC. (1998). Doing a literature review, releasing the social science research imagination. SAGE Publications.
40.
HawkinsC. V.WangX. H. (2012). Sustainable development governance: Citizen participation and support networks in local sustainability initiatives. Public Works Management & Policy, 17(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x11429045
HoA. T. K.NiA. Y. (2004). Explaining the adoption of e-government features – a case study of Iowa County treasurers’ offices. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004264355
43.
HussainS.McKellarJ. (2020). Exploring the success of social infrastructure public private partnerships: The complex case of Bridgepoint Active Healthcare in Ontario, Canada. Public Works Management & Policy, 25(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x19899406
IrfanullahA. M.KhanN. M. (2009). Public sector innovation, case study of e-government projects in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 48(4II), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.30541/v48i4iipp.439-457
46.
JaegerP. T. (2005). Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government. Government Information Quarterly, 22(4), 702–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.01.012
47.
JanssenM.EstevezE. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
KalvetT. (2012). Innovation, a factor explaining e-government success in Estonia. Electronic Government an International Journal, 9(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2012.046266
50.
KarimM. A. (2003). Technology and improved service delivery, learning points from the Malaysian experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303069002005
KlievinkB.RomijnB.-J.CunninghamS.de BruijnH. (2016). Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9686-2
53.
KohC. E.PrybutokV. R. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2003.11647514
54.
KortelandE.BekkersV. (2007). Diffusion of e-government innovations in the dutch public sector, the case of digital community policing. In WimmerM. A.SchollJ.GrönlundÅ. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science electronic government (pp. 252–264). Springer.
55.
LenkK. (2003). Electronic service delivery – a driver of public sector modernisation. Information Polity, 7(2–3), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-2002-0009
56.
LiM. H.FeeneyM. K. (2012). Adoption of electronic technologies in local U.S. Governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012460910
57.
LiangS. W.LuH. P. (2013). Adoption of e-government services, an empirical study of the online tax filing system in Taiwan. Online Information Review, 37(3), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-01-2012-0004
58.
LimJ. H. (2010). Empowering citizens’ voices in the era of e-government: Implications from South Korean cases. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 5(16), 19–31.
59.
Lucendo-MonederoA. L.Ruiz-RodríguezF.González-RelañoR. (2019). Measuring the digital divide at regional level. A spatial analysis of the inequalities in digital development of households and individuals in Europe. Telematics and Informatics, 41, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.05.002
60.
ManoharanA. (2013). A study of the determinants of county e-government in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012437876
61.
ManoharanA. P.ZhengY.MelitskiJ. (2017). Global comparative municipal e-governance, factors & trends. International Review of Public Administration, 22(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2017.1292031
62.
MoonM. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities, rhetoric or reality?Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
63.
MoonM. J.NorrisD. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x
64.
NamT. (2018). Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.005
65.
Naranjo-ZolotovM.OliveiraT.CasteleynS. (2019). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation. Information Technology & People, 32(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-08-2017-0257
66.
NavarraD. D.CornfordT. (2012). The state and democracy after new public management: Exploring alternative models of E-governance. The Information Society, 28(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2012.632264
OliveiraG. H.WelchE. W. (2013). Social media use in local government, linkage of technology task & organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019
70.
ØlnesS.UbachtJ.JanssenM. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007
71.
OsborneS. P.RadnorZ.NasiG. (2012). A new theory for public service management? toward a (public). Service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935
72.
PangM. S.LeeG.DeloneW. H. (2014). IT resources organizational capabilities and value creation in public-sector organizations, a public-value management perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 29(3), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.2
73.
PorumbescuG. (2015). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015607301
74.
PrinsJ.BroedersD.GriffioenH. (2012). iGovernment, a new perspective on the future of government digitisation. Computer Law and Security Review, 28(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.03.010
75.
RausM.FlüggeB.BoutellierR. (2009). Electronic customs innovation, an improvement of governmental infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.008
76.
ReevesE. (2013). The not so good, the bad and the ugly: Over twelve years of PPP in Ireland. Local Government Studies, 39(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.781023
77.
ReddickC. G.ZhengY. (2017). Determinants of citizens’ mobile apps future use in Chinese local governments. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(2), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-11-2016-0078
78.
RosenbergerM.LehrerC.JungR. (2016). Integrating data from user activities of social networks into public administrations. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9682-6
79.
Rubino-HallmanS.HannaN. K. (2007). New technologies for public sector transformation, a critical analysis of e-government initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of E-Government, 3(3), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/j399v03n03_02
80.
SavoldelliA.CodagnoneC.MisuracaG. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox, learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), S63–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
81.
ShareefM. A.KumarU.KumarV.DwivediY. K. (2009). Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government. Electronic Government an International Journal, 6(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2009.022594
82.
ShareefM. A.KumarU.KumarV.DwivediY. K. (2011). e-Government Adoption Model (GAM), differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006
83.
SiddiqueeN. A. (2008). E-government and innovations in service delivery, the Malaysian experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(7), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690802153053
84.
SiddiqueeN. A. (2016). E-government and transformation of service delivery in developing. The Bangladesh experience and lessons. Transforming Government, People Process and Policy, 10(3), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-09-2015-0039
85.
SiemiatyckiM.FarooqiN. (2012). Value for money and risk in public–private partnerships. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.715525
86.
SiewL. S.LengL. Y. (2003). E-government in action: Singapore case study. Journal of Political Marketing, 2(3–4), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1300/j199v02n03_02
87.
SivarajahU.IraniZ.WeerakkodyV. (2015). Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.004
88.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
89.
SpirakisG.SpirakiC.NikolopoulosK. (2010). The impact of electronic government on democracy, e-democracy through e-participation. Electronic Government an International Journal, 7(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2010.029892
90.
TanC. W.BenbasatI. (2009). IT mediated customer services in e-government, a citizen’s perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02412
91.
TaylorN. G.JaegerP. T.GorhamU.BertotJ. C.LincolnR.LarsonE. (2014). The circular continuum of agencies public libraries and users, a model of e-government in practice. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), S18–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.004
92.
ThomasJ. C.StreibG. (2005). E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704273212
93.
TolbertC. J.MossbergerK.McnealR. (2008). Institutions policy innovation and e-government in the American states. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x
94.
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
95.
TungL. L.RieckO. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.001
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y.ChanF. K.HuP. J. (2016). Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612
98.
Vyas-DoorgapersadS. (2009). The application of e-government for increased service delivery in South Africa. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Annual Review, 4(1), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v04i01/52824
99.
WangS.FeeneyM. K. (2016). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014553462
100.
WireduG. O. (2012). Information systems innovation in public organizations, an institutional perspective. Information Technology and People, 25(2), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593841211232703
101.
WohlersT. E. (2009). The digital world of local government, a comparative analysis of the United States and Germany. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680902821593
YehH. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.001
ZupicI.ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
