The article shows how to improve the performance of public agencies through the integration of social capital. It attempts to fill a gap in the literature of the potential of social capital and how different public policies might interact with it. The work’s originality lies in further clarifying how a social capital approach to public policies should work in practice. Thanks to the availability of unpublished data, it allows one to evaluate the applicative possibilities in the planning and evaluation of public safety policies improving public administration goals.
BoltG.PhillipsD.Van KempenR. (2010). Housing policy, (de)segregation and social mixing: An international perspective. Housing Studies, 25(2), 129–135.
9.
BorgattiS. P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12, 21–34.
10.
BourdieuP. (1980). Le capital social: notes provisoires [Social capital: provisional notes], in «Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales», n. 31, 2–3.
11.
BoyerL.BelzeauxR.MaurelO.Baumstarck-BarrauK.SamuelianJ. C. (2010). A social network analysis of healthcare professional relationships in a French hospital. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 23(5), 460–469.
12.
BrassD. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518–539.
13.
BugattiR.Gatti, . (2013). Migliorare le performance organizzative aziendali attraverso l’utilizzo dell’Organizational network analysis (ONA) [Improving organizational performance through the use of organizational network analysis (ONA)]. SistemiandImpresa, 6, 58–63.
14.
CrossR. L.SingerJ.ColellaS.ThomasR. J.SilverstoneY. (2010). The organizational network fieldbook: Best practices, techniques and exercises to drive organizational innovation and performance. John Wiley & Sons.
15.
De BlasioG.NuzzoG. (2009). Historical traditions of civicness and local economic development. Journal of Regional Science, 50(4), 833–857.
16.
DekkerK. (2007). Social capital, neighbourhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas. A case study in the Hague and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 22(3), 355–379.
17.
Delilah RoqueA.PijawkaD.WutichA. (2020). The role of social capital in resiliency: Disaster recovery in Puerto Rico. Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 11(2), 204–235.
18.
FlintJ.KearnsA. (2006). Housing, neighbourhood renewal and social capital: The case of registered social landlords in Scotland. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), 31–54.
19.
GuisoL.SapienzaP.ZingalesL. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556.
20.
GuisoL.SapienzaP.ZingalesL. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48.
21.
GuisoL.SapienzaP.ZingalesL. (2008). Alfred Marshall LectureSocial capital as good culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2-3), 295–320.
22.
GuisoL.SapienzaP.ZingalesL. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095–1131.
23.
HansenP. G. (2019). The concepts of nudge and nudging in behavioural public policy. In StrassheimH.BeckS. (Eds.), Handbook of behavioural change and public policy (pp. 63–77). Edward Elgar Publishing.
24.
HishidaN.ShawR. (2014). Social capital in disaster recovery in Japan: An overview. In ShawR. (Ed.), Community practices for disaster risk reduction in Japan (pp. 51–62).
25.
HsuehH. Y. (2019). The role of household social capital in post-disaster recovery: An empirical study in Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, 101199.
26.
HuangK.ProvanK. G. (2007). Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health services network. Public Management Review, 9(2), 169–189.
27.
JohnP. (2018). How far to nudge?: Assessing behavioural public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
28.
JoshiA.AokiM. (2014). The role of social capital and public policy in disaster recovery: A case study of Tamil Nadu State, India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 7, 100–108.
29.
KeatingN.SwindleJ.FosterD. (2005). The role of social capital in aging well. In FrankJ. (Ed.), Social capital in action: Thematic policy studies (pp. 24–51).
30.
KenisP.ProvanK. G. (2009). Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 87(3), 440–456.
31.
KilduffM.BrassD. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317–357.
32.
KilduffM.CrosslandC.TsaiW.KrackhardtD. (2008). Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(1), 15–28.
33.
KleinhansR.PriemusH.EngbersenG. (2007). Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 44(5-6), 1069–1091.
34.
KlijnE. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.
35.
KlijnE. H.KoppenjanJ. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717–747.
36.
KlijnE. H.KoppenjanJ. (2012). Governance network theory: Past, present and future. Policy and Politics, 40(4), 587–606.
KnackS.KeeferP. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
39.
KrackhardtD.NohriaN.EcclesB. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In CrossR.ParkerA.SassonL. (Eds.), Networks in the knowledge economy (pp. 216–239).
40.
LangR. E.HornburgS. P. (1998). What is social capital and why is it important to public policy?Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 1–16.
41.
LathamM. (1998). Civilising global capital : New thinking for Australian labor. Allen & Unwin.
42.
LévesqueM. (2005). Social capital in action, thematic policy studies. Policy Research Initiative.
43.
Masud-All-KamalM.Monirul HassanS. M. (2018). The link between social capital and disaster recovery: Evidence from coastal communities in Bangladesh. Natural Hazards, 93, 1547–1564.
44.
MiddletonA.MurieA.GrovesR. (2005). Social capital and neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1711–1738.
45.
MuirJ. (2011). Bridging and linking in a divided society: A social capital case study from Northern Ireland. Urban Studies, 48(5), 959–976.
46.
Policy Research Initiative. (2005). Social capital as a public policy tool: Project report. Government of Canada, Policy Research Initiative.
47.
ProvanK. G.HuangK.MilwardH. B. (2009). The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 873–893.
48.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
49.
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.
50.
PutnamR. D.LeonardiR.NonettiR. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
51.
RhodesJ.TylerP.BrennanA.StevensS.WarnockC.Otero-GarciaM. (2002). Lessons and evaluation evidence from ten single regeneration budget case studies: Mid-term report. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions.
52.
SmithG. R. (1999). Area-based initiatives: the rationale and options for area targeting. Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE), Paper No. 25, London School of Economics.
53.
TabelliniG. (2005). The role of the state in economic development. Kyklos, 58(2), 283–303.
54.
TabelliniG. (2008). Presidential AddressInstitutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2-3), 255–294.
55.
TabelliniG. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.
56.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
VallanceS.RudkevitchA. (2021). Post-disaster recovery and social capital. In McQueenD. V. (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of global public health (pp. 1–18). Oxford University Press.
59.
Van BeckhovenE.Van KempenR. (2013). Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. In GalsterG.MusterdS. (Eds.), Life in poverty neighbourhoods (pp. 57–79). Routledge.
60.
WhelanC. (2011). Network dynamics and network effectiveness: A methodological framework for public sector networks in the field of national security. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), 275–286.
61.
WhelanC. (2015). Managing dynamic public sector networks: Effectiveness, performance, and a methodological framework in the field of national security. International Public Management Journal, 18(4), 536–567.
62.
WhelanC. (2017a). Security networks and occupational culture: understanding culture within and between organisations. Policing & Society, 27(2), 113–135.
63.
WhelanC. (2017b). Managing dynamic security networks: Towards the strategic managing of cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Security Journal, 30, 310–327.
64.
ZakP. J.KnackS. (2001). Trust and growth. Econometrics Journal, 111(470), 295–321.
65.
ZierschA.ArthursonK. (2007). Social capital and housing tenure in an Adelaide neighbourhood. Urban Policy and Research, 25(4), 409–431.
