The existing body of research on the platform economy provides a variety of interpretations of platform labor. Nevertheless, current studies have either placed exchange rather than production at the core of their interpretations or overlooked the historical continuity of the type of labor to which platform labor belongs. Employing a historical-comparative approach, this article introduces the concept of “cross-boundary subsumption” to illuminate the characteristics of platform labor. Drawing insights from investigations and interviews conducted on ride-hailing platforms in China from 2018 to 2020, this article delves into how cross-boundary subsumption works in reality. The goal is to improve the understanding of platform labor and uncover the limits of the current models of the platform economy.
ARRIGHIGIOVANNI (1970) “Labour supplies in historical perspective: a study of the proletarianization of the African peasantry in Rhodesia.” J. of Development Studies6, 3: 197–234.
2.
ARRIGHIGIOVANNIASCHOFFNICOLESCULLYBEN (2010) “Accumulation by dispossession and its limits: the southern Africa paradigm revisited.” Studies in Comparative International Development45, 4: 410–38.
3.
BIRCHKEANCOCHRANED. T. (2022) “Big tech: four emerging forms of digital rentiership.” Science as Culture31, 1: 44–58.
4.
BRAUDELFERNAND (1984) Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, Vol. 3. London: Collins.
5.
BRAVERMANHARRY (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
6.
CHENJULIE Y. (2018) “Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy.” New Media & Society 20, 8: 2691–2711.
7.
CHENJULIE Y.QIUJACK L. (2019) “Digital utility: datafication, regulation, labor, and DiDi’s platformization of urban transport in China.” Chinese J. of Communication12, 3: 274–89.
8.
CHENJULIE Y.SUNPING (2020) “Temporal arbitrage, fragmented rush, and opportunistic behaviors: the labor politics of time in the platform economy.” New Media and Society22, 9: 1561–79.
9.
CHENYIYUAN 陈义媛 (2018) “农产品经纪人与经济作物产品流通: 地方市场的村庄嵌入性研究” (Agricultural commodity brokers and the trade of cash crops: a study on the embeddedness of the local market). 中国农村经济12: 117–29.
10.
CHRISTOPHERSBRETT (2022) Rentier Capitalism: Who Owns the Economy, and Who Pays for It? Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
11.
DING WEI丁未 (2021) “遭遇‘平台’: 另类数字劳动与新权力装置” (Encountering the “platform”: alternative digital labor and the new assemblage of power). 新闻与传播研究10: 20–38.
12.
EDWARDSRICHARD (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.
13.
FENGXIAOJUN 封小郡 (2021) “非正规就业相关研究: 综合性理论图景与经验研究述评” (Studies on informal employment: a comprehensive theoretical picture and critique of empirical studies). 开放时代2: 159–78.
14.
FINKINMATTHEW W. (2016) “Beclouded work, beclouded workers in historical perspective.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy J. 37, 3: 603–18.
15.
FUCHUNHUI 傅春晖 (2014) “包买制: 历史沿革及其理论意义” (The putting-out system: historical evolution and theoretical significance). 社会学研究2: 189–217.
16.
GÜRELBURAK (2011) “Agrarian change and labour supply in Turkey, 1950–1980.” J. of Agrarian Change11, 2: 195–219.
17.
HUANGYU (2015) “Can capitalist farms defeat family farms? The dynamics of capitalist accumulation in shrimp aquaculture in South China.” J. of Agrarian Change 15, 3: 392–412.
18.
HUANGZONGZHI 黄宗智 [Philip C. C. Huang] (2013) “重新认识中国劳动人民——劳动法规的历史演变与当前的非正规经济” (Reconceptualizing China’s laboring people: historical change in China’s labor laws and the present-day informal economy). 开放时代5: 56–73.
19.
JONNAR. JAMILFOSTERJOHN B. (2016) “Marx’s theory of working-class precariousness: its relevance today.” Monthly Rev. 67, 11: 1–20.
20.
KALLEBERGARNE L.HEWISONKEVIN (2013) “Precarious work and the challenge for Asia.” American Behavioral Scientist57, 3: 271–88.
21.
KHANLINA M. (2018) “Sources of tech platform power.” Georgetown Law Technology Rev. 2, 2: 325–34.
22.
LIANGELA K. (2022) “Beyond algorithmic control: flexibility, intermediaries, and paradox in the on-demand economy.” Information, Communication & Society25, 14: 2012–27.
23.
LIANGELA K. (2024) “Beyond precarity: forced labor in China’s ride-hailing industry.” New Media & Society26, 4. doi:10.1177/14614448221080460.
24.
MARGLINSTEPHEN A. (1974) “What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production.” Rev. of Radical Political Economics6, 2: 60–112.
25.
MARXKARL (1967 [1887]) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1 The Process of Capitalist Production. Edited by EngelsFrederick. Translated by MooreSamuelAvelingEdward. New York, NY: International Publishers.
26.
QIHAOLIZHONGJIN (2019) “Giovanni Arrighi in Beijing: rethinking the transformation of the labor supply in rural China during the reform era.” Science & Society83, 3: 327–54.
27.
QIHAOLIZHONGJIN (2020) “Putting precarity back to production: a case study of Didi Kuaiche drivers in the city of Nanjing, China.” Rev. of Radical Political Economics52, 3: 506–22.
28.
ROCHETJEAN-CHARLESTIROLEJEAN (2003) “Platform competition in two-sided markets.” J. of the European Economic Association4, 4: 990–1029.
29.
SADOWSKIJATHAN (2020) “The internet of landlords: digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism.” Antipode52, 2: 562–80.
30.
STANDINGGUY (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. New York: Bloomsbury.
31.
STANFORDJIM (2017) “The resurgence of gig work: historical and theoretical perspectives.” Economic and Labour Relations Rev. 28, 3: 382–401.
32.
STANFORDJIM (2021) “The past, present and future of gig work.” Pp. 46–67 in MeijerinkJeroenJansenGiedoDaskalovaVictoria (eds.), Platform Economy Puzzles: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Gig Work. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33.
STANFORDJIM (2022) “Carrots, sticks, and gigs: social structures, labor extraction, and platform work.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology40A: 79–102.
34.
SUYIHUI 苏熠慧JIANHUA 姚建华YAO (2019) “‘不稳定无产者’研究谱系及其当代意义” (A study on “the precariat” and its implications in contemporary China). 社会科学6: 98–108.
35.
WUGUANGHAN 武广汉 (2012) “‘中间商+农民’模式与农民的半无产化” (The “middleman plus peasant” model and the semi-proletarianization of peasants). 开放时代3: 100–11.
36.
ZHANGLIN (2020) “When platform capitalism meets petty capitalism in China: Alibaba and an integrated approach to platformization.” International J. of Communication2020, 14: 114–34.
37.
ZHANGWEIQIHAOLIZHONGJIN (2021) “Regulated market, trapped workers: the impacts of the ‘tolerant and prudent’ policy on labour precarity in China’s online ride-hailing sector.” Political Economy Research Initiative working paper no. 553. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/peri_workingpapers/369/.
38.
ZHAOLEI 赵磊YUE 韩玥HAN (2021) “跨越企业边界的科层控制——网约车平台的劳动力组织与控制研究” (Hierarchical control across corporate boundaries: on labor organization and control for online ride-hailing platforms—a case study of W ride-hailing platform in City T). 社会学研究5: 70–90.
