Scholarly research focusing on teaching and learning has experienced extraordinary growth in the last 20 years. Although this is generally good news for the profession of teaching, a troubling form of tribalism has emerged that inhibits the advancement of teaching practice. In this essay, we trace the development of scholarly inquiry into teaching and learning and the emergence of different “tribes” within the movement, each with its own outlets, goals, and methods. Finally, we discuss how these tribes can bridge their differences and work together to advance teaching effectiveness.
Abd-El-FattahS. M. (2011). The effect of test expectations on study strategies and test performance: A metacognitive perspective. Educational Psychology, 31, 497–511. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.570250
2.
AnthisK. (2011). Is it the clicker, or is it the question? Untangling the effects of student response system use. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 189–193. doi:10.1177/0098628311411895
3.
BanajiM. R.CrowderR. G. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 44, 1185–1193. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1185
4.
BerryJ. W.ChewS. L. (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 305–312. doi:10.1080/00986280802373841
5.
BoyerE. L. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
CeciS. J.BronfenbrennerU. (1991). On the demise of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 46, 27–31. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.27
8.
ChewS. L. (2005). Seldom in doubt but often wrong: Addressing tenacious student misconceptions. In DunnD. S.ChewS. L. (Eds.), Best practices in teaching general psychology (pp. 211–223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
ChewS. L.BartlettR.DobbinsJ.HammerE. Y.KiteM.LoopT.RoseK. A. (2009). Contextual approach to teaching: Bridging goals and outcomes. In HalpernD. (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline (pp. 95–112). Washington, DC: APA.
10.
ConwayJ. M.AmelE. L.GerwienD. P. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning’s effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 233–245. doi:10.1080/00986280903172969
11.
DanielD. B. (2012). Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 251–253. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.004
12.
DanielD. B.BroidaJ. P. (2004). Using web-based quizzing to improve exam performance: Lessons learned. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 207–208. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3103_6
13.
DanielD. B.PooleD. (2009). Learning for life: An ecological approach to pedagogical research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 91–96. doi:10.1111/j.1745–6924.2009.01095.x
14.
DanielD. B.WoodyW. D. (2012). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016
15.
DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A.MarshE. J.NathanM. J.WillinghamD. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
16.
GeakeJ. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Researcher, 50, 123–133. doi:10.1080/00131880802082518
17.
GoswamiU. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 406–413. doi:10.1038/nrg1869
18.
GurungR. A. R.DanielD. B.LandrumR. E. (2012). A multisite study of learning in introductory psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 170–175. doi:10.1177/0098628312450428
19.
HardinE. E. (2007). Presentation software in the college classroom: Don’t forget the instructor. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 53–57. doi:10.1080/00986280709336652
20.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.
21.
KlatzkyR. L. (1991). Let’s be friends. American Psychologist, 46, 43–45. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.43
22.
MayerR. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
PashlerH.McDanielM.RohrerD.BjorkR. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
25.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (2005). Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 7–27. doi:10.1080/0141192052000310001
26.
RossM. E.GreenS. B.Salisbury-GlennonJ. D.TollefsonN. (2006). College students’ study strategies as a function of testing: An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 361–375. doi:10.1007/s10755-005-9004-2
27.
SawyerR. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, preface. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
ShulmanL. S. (2004). Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
SmithR. A.BuskistW. (Eds.). (2008). The scholarship of teaching and learning in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 247–248. doi:10.1080/00986280802418737
30.
SylvanLChristodoulouJ. A. (2010). Understanding the role of neuroscience in brain-based products: A guide for educators and consumers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01077.x
31.
VosniadouS.BrewerW. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-w
