Across languages, children do not comprehend 3SG/3PL subject–verb agreement before age five, despite early mastery in spontaneous speech. This study investigates subject–verb agreement in a language hitherto not studied in this respect, namely Dutch. The authors examine if (1) Dutch two- and three-year-olds comprehend subject–verb agreement and (2) a comprehension–production asymmetry still exists if task materials are kept constant across domains. Dutch-speaking two- and three-year-olds completed a comprehension (picture selection) and production (sentence completion) task testing 3SG and 3PL. In comprehension, both groups performed above chance on 3PL but not on 3SG. In production, accuracy on 3PL and 3SG was slightly higher than in comprehension. Comprehension and production were moderately correlated. These results show that comprehension is earlier in Dutch than in previously investigated languages, but only for 3PL, suggesting that phonological salience and cue reliability are important. They also show an asymmetry between comprehension and production, albeit much smaller than assumed in previous studies.
BennisH.MacLeanA. (2006). Variation in verbal inflection in Dutch dialects. Morphology, 16, 291–312.
2.
BlomE. (2003). From root infinitive to finite sentence. The acquisition of verbal inflections and auxiliaries (Dissertation Series). Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
3.
BlomE.PolišenskáD.WeermanF. (2006). Effects of age on the acquisition of agreement inflection. Morphology, 16, 313–336.
4.
BlomE.VasićN.de JongJ. (2014). Production and processing of subject-verb agreement in monolingual Dutch children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 952–965.
5.
BlomE.WijnenF. (2013). Optionality of finiteness: Evidence for a no overlap stage in Dutch child language. First Language, 33, 225–245.
6.
Brandt-KobeleO.-C.HöhleB. (2010). What asymmetries within comprehension reveal about asymmetries between comprehension and production: The case of verb inflection in language acquisition. Lingua, 120, 1910–1925.
7.
BrownR. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BrysbaertM.StevensM.De DeyneS.VoorspoelsW.StormsG. (2014). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80–84.
9.
ClahsenH. (1986). Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics, 24, 79–121.
10.
De VilliersJ. G.GxilisheS. (2008). The acquisition of number agreement in English and Xhosa. In BrucartJ. M.GavarroA.SolàJ. (Eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition (pp. 104–123). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
GathercoleV. C. M.SebastiánE.SotoP. (2002). The emergence of linguistic person in Spanish-speaking children. Language Learning, 52, 679–722.
12.
GrodzinskyY.ReinhartT. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 69–101.
13.
GxilisheS.SmouseM.XhalisaT.de VilliersJ. G. (2009). Children’s insensitivity to information from the target of agreement: The case of Xhosa. In CrawfordJ.OtakiK.TakahashiM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America (pp. 46–53). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
14.
HendriksP. (2008). A unified explanation for production/comprehension asymmetries. In Gavarró AlgueróA.João FreitasM. (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp. 240–251). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
15.
HendriksP.SpenaderJ. (2006). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13, 319–349.
16.
Hirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
17.
HöhleB.BergerF.MüllerA.SchmitzM.WeissenbornJ. (2009). Focus particles in children’s language. Production and comprehension of auch ‘also’ in German learners from 1 year to 4 years of age. Language Acquisition, 16, 36–66.
18.
HüttnerT.DrenhausH.VandeVijverR.WeissenbornJ. (2004). The acquisition of the German focus particle auch ‘too’: Comprehension does not always precede production. In BrugosA.MicciullaL.SmithC. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
19.
JohnsonV. A.de VilliersJ. G.SeymourH. N. (2005). Agreement without understanding? The case of third person singular /s/. First Language, 25, 317–330.
20.
JordensP. (1990). The acquisition of verb placement. Linguistics, 28, 1407–1448.
21.
LegendreG.BarrièreI.GoyetL.NazziT. (2010). Comprehension of infrequent subject-verb agreement forms: Evidence from French-learning children. Child Development, 81, 1859–1875.
22.
LegendreG.CulbertsonJ.ZaroukianE.HsinL.BarrièreI.NazziT. (2013). Is children’s comprehension of subject–verb agreement universally late? Comparative evidence from French, English, and Spanish. Lingua, 144, 21–39.
23.
LeonardL.BertoliniU. (1998). Grammatical morphology and the role of weak syllables in the speech of Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1363–1374.
24.
LeonardL.BertoliniU.CaselliM.McGregorK.SabbadiniL. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition, 2, 151–179.
25.
MacWhinneyB.BatesE.KlieglR. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150.
26.
MontrulS. A. (2004). The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
27.
MüllerA.HöhleB.SchmitzM.WeissenbornJ. (2009). Information structural constraints on children’s early language production: The acquisition of the focus particle auch (‘also’) in German-learning 12- to 36-month-olds. First Language, 29, 373–399.
PoeppelD.WexlerK. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1–33.
30.
PolišenskáD. (2010). Dutch children’s acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection (Dissertation Series). Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
31.
RiceM. L.WexlerK. (2002). Test of early grammatical impairment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
32.
RubinoR. B.PineJ. M. (1998). Subject–verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: What low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language, 25, 35–60.
33.
SchlichtingL.SpelbergL. (2002). Lexilijst Nederlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pearson Assessment and Information B.V.
34.
TheakstonA. L.LievenE. V. M.TomaselloM. (2003). The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 863–877.
35.
ThorntonR.WexlerK. (1999). Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Van BreeC. (1987). Historische grammatical van het Nederlands [Historical grammar of Dutch]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
37.
WeissenbornJ.KailM.FriedericiA. (1990). Language particular or language independent factors in acquisition? Children’s comprehension of object pronouns in Dutch, French and German. First Language, 10, 141–166.
38.
WijnenF.VerripsM. (1998). The acquisition of Dutch syntax. In GillisS.De HouwerA. (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch (pp. 233–299). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
39.
WilsonS. (2003). Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language, 30, 1–41.
40.
ZinkI.LejaegereM. (2002). N-CDIs: Lijsten voor Communicatieve Ontwikkeling. Aanpassing en hernormering van de MacArthur CDIs van Fenson et al. [A CDI user’s manual with normative and validity data]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
