Courses and training in public decision-making have often disappeared from Public Administration curricula. This paper argues that this is unfortunate as skills therein are severely needed to steer developments towards the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Whereas some see this as a macro development that befalls countries, this paper argues otherwise. Decision-making by individual and corporate actors is judged to be central in the 4IR. This makes the steering thereof possible and desirable. Without being trained in the needed skills in decision-making our graduates will not be prepared to do so and will not become the responsible public officials able to direct 4IR developments.
BarocasSSelbstAD (2016) Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review104: 671–685.
3.
BenyeraE (2022) The fourth industrial revolution and Africa: a cure which kills the patient. In: Africa and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Cham: Springer.
4.
ChungCS (2020) Developing Digital Governance: South Korea as a Global Digital Government Leader. London: Routledge.
5.
De VriesMS (2001) The attack on the state: a comparison of the arguments. International Review of Administrative Sciences67(3): 389–414.
6.
DonovanP (2020) Profit and Prejudice: The Luddites of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. SI: Routledge.
7.
DuttaSLanvinB (2019) The Network Readiness Index 2019: Towards a Future-Ready Society Portulans Institute (2019). Washington DC, USA: Network Readiness Index 2019.
8.
GillespieT (2014) The Relevance of Algorithms. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. GillespieTBoczkowskiPFootK (eds). Cambridge MA: Media Technologies.
JansenMKukG (2016) The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly33(3): 371–377.
14.
KahnemanDK (2017) Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: MacMillan.
15.
KahnemanDKSibonyOSunsteinC (2021) Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. New York: Little, Brown.
16.
KashinKKingGSonejiS (2015) Systematic bias and non-transparency in US Social Security Administration forecasts. Journal of Economic Perspectives29(2): 239–258.
17.
KodamaFShibataT (2017) Beyond fusion towards IoT by way of open innovation: an investigation based on the Japanese machine tool industry 1975–2015. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity3: 23.
KuziemskiMMisuracaG (2020) AI governance in the public sector: three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy44(6): 101976.
20.
LeadbeaterC (2011) The Civic Long Tail. London: Demos.
21.
LeeMYunJJPykaA, et al. (2018) How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity4(3): 21.
22.
NeneN (2018) Most municipal managers, CFO’s do not meet minimum competency levels. Local Government Review. October 19.
23.
OECD (2017) The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264271036-en. (accessed 2 February 2022).
24.
PlantKPadotanR (2017) Improving skills development in the South African public sector: an internal audit perspective. Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research19(1): 35–48.
25.
RaadscheldersJCWhetsellTA (2018) Conceptualizing the landscape of decision making for complex problem solving. International Journal of Public Administration41(14): 1132–1144.
26.
ReinickeWH (2000) Global Public Policy: Governing without Government?Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
27.
RocoMCBainbridgeWS (2005) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. Journal of Nanoparticle Research7(1): 1–13.
SaviottiPPPykaA (2004) Economic development by the creation of new sectors. J. Evol. Econ14: 1–36.
30.
SchwabKDavisN (2018) Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World. London: Penguin Random House.
31.
SchwabK (2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business.
32.
SchwartzBWardAMonterossoJ, et al. (2002) Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(5): 1178–1197.
33.
SekwenaT (2019) The 4IR: Surviving the Era of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. South Africa: Orison Teknologies (Pty) Ltd.
34.
SimonHA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics69(1): 99–118.
35.
SimonHA (1959) Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review49(3): 253–283.
36.
TaeihaghARameshMHowlettM (2021) Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies. Regulation & Governance15(4): 1009–1019.
37.
UlbrichtLYoungK (2022) Algorithmic regulation: a maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms. Regulation & Governance16(1): 3–22.
Van LaarEVan DeursenAJVan DijkJA, et al. (2017) The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: a systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior72: 577–588.
40.
Van NoordtCMisuracaG (2020) Exploratory insights on artificial intelligence for government in Europe. Social Science Computer Review40: 426–444.
41.
Van WezelAPvan LenteHvan de SandtJJ, et al. (2018) Risk analysis and technology assessment in support of technology development: putting responsible innovation in practice in a case study for nanotechnology. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management14(1): 9–16.
42.
VealeMBrassI (2019) Administration by algorithm? Public management meets public sector machine learning. In: YeungKLodgeM (eds) Algorithmic Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University.
43.
WilliamsonB (2014) New governing experts in education: self-learning software, policy labs, and transactional pedagogies. In: FenwickTMangezEOzgaJ (eds) Governing Knowledge: Comparison, Knowledge-Based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education. London: Routledge, pp. 218–231.
