Precursor behaviors are innocuous behaviors that reliably precede the occurrence of problem behavior. Intervention efforts applied to precursors might prevent the occurrence of severe problem behavior. We examined the relationship between precursor behavior and problem behavior in three individuals with developmental disabilities. First, a descriptive (correlational) assessment focusing on transitional probabilities, which established that problem behavior typically followed precursor behavior, was conducted. Next, a functional (experimental) analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between precursor and problem behavior. Results suggested that these two behaviors served the same function. Finally, in the intervention phase, participants were taught a response that was functionally equivalent to the precursor behavior. Results demonstrated a decrease in the frequency of problem behavior. Collectively, these results suggest that prevention efforts might profitably be focused on precursor behavior. Further implications for the use of functional analysis and functional communication training in prevention are discussed.
Albin, R.W., O'Brien, M., & Horner, R.H. (1995). Analysis of an escalating sequence of problem behaviors: A case study. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 16, 133-147.
2.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Carr, E.G., & Durand, V.M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 18, 111-126.
Catania, A. C. (Ed.). (1968). Contemporary research in operant behavior. Glenview, IL : Scott, Foresman.
6.
Desrochers, M.N., Hile, M.G., & Williams-Moseley, T.L. (1997). Survey of functional assessment procedures used with individuals who display mental retardation and severe problem behaviors. American Journal on Mental Retardation , 101, 535-546.
7.
Durand, V.M., & Crimmins, D.B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99-117.
8.
Evans, I.M., Meyer, L.H., Kurkjian, J.A., & Kishi, G.S. (1988). An evaluation of behavioral interrelationships in child behavior therapy. In J. C. Witt , S. N. Elliot, & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in education (pp. 189-215). New York: Plenum.
9.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C.C., Bowman, L.G., Hagopian, L.P., & Langdon, N.A. (1994). Empirically derived consequences: A data-based method for prescribing interventions for destructive behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 133-149.
10.
Hagopian, L.P., Paclawskyj, T.R., & Kuhn, S.C. (2005). The use of conditional probability analysis to identify a response chain leading to the occurrence of eye poking. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 393-397.
11.
Harding, J.W., Wacker, D.P., Berg, W.K., Barretto, A., Winborn, L., & Gardner, A. (2001). Analysis of response class hierarchies with attention-maintained problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 61-64.
12.
Harris, A. (1980). Response class: A Guttman scale analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 213-220.
13.
Horner, R.H., & Day, H.M. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719-732.
14.
Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M., Slifer, K., Bauman, K., & Richman, G. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3-20.
15.
Kuhn, S.A.C., Lerman, D.C., Vorndran, C.M., & Addison, L. (2006). Analysis of factors that affect responding in a two-response chain in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 263-280.
16.
Lalli, J.S., Mace, F.C., Wohn, T., & Livezey, K. (1995). Identification and modification of a response-class hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 551-559.
17.
Magee, S., & Ellis, J. (2000). Extinction effects during the assessment of multiple problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 313-316.
18.
Mayer-Johnson Company. (1994). The picture communication symbols combination book. Solona Beach, CA: Author.
19.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., Storey, L., & Newton, J.S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
Repp, A.C., Karsh, K.G., Van Acker, R., Felce, D., & Harman, M. (1989). A computer-based system for collecting and analyzing observational data. Journal of Special Education, 9, 207-217.
22.
Reynolds, G.S. (1968). A primer of operant conditioning. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
23.
Richman, D.M. (2008). Annotation: Early intervention and prevention of self-injurious behaviour exhibited by young children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research , 52, 3-17.
24.
Richman, D.M., Wacker, D.P., Asmus, J.M., Casey, S.D., & Andelman, M. (1999). Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 269-283.
25.
Skinner, B.F. (1948). "Superstition" in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172.
26.
Smith, R.G., & Churchill, R.M. (2002). Identification of environmental determinants of behavior disorders through functional analysis of precursor behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 125-136.
27.
Voeltz, L.M., & Evans, I.M. (1982). The assessment of behavioral interrelationships in child behavior therapy. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 131-165.
28.
Wahler, R.G. (1975). Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 27-42.
