Two studies tested the affect-as-cognitive-feedback model, in which positive and negative affective states are not uniquely associated with particular processing styles, but rather serve as feedback about currently accessible processing styles. The studies extend existing work by investigating (a) both incidental and integral affect, (b) out-group judgments, and (c) downstream consequences. We manipulated processing styles and either incidental (Study 1) or integral (Study 2) affect and measured perceptions of out-group homogeneity. Positive (relative to negative) affect increased out-group homogeneity judgments when global processing was primed, but under local priming, the effect reversed (Studies 1 and 2). A similar interactive effect emerged on attributions, which had downstream consequences for behavioral intentions (Study 2). These results demonstrate that both incidental and integral affect do not directly produce specific processing styles, but rather influence thinking by providing feedback about currently accessible processing styles.
AjzenI.BrownT. C.CarvajalF. (2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1108-1121.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, UK: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BakkerM.van DijkA.WichertsJ. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543-554.
4.
BlessH.CloreG. L.SchwarzN.GolisanoV.RabeC.WölkM. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665-679.
5.
BodenhausenG. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
BodenhausenG. V.KramerG. P.SüsserK. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621-632.
7.
BodenhausenG. V.MussweilerT.GabrielS.MorenoK. (2001). Affective influences on stereotyping and intergroup relations. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 319-343). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BrewerM. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In SrullT. K.Wyer Jr.R. S. (Eds.), A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.BardenJ. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711-727.
10.
BrunerJ. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
11.
BullockH. E. (2008). Justifying inequality: A social psychology analysis of beliefs about poverty and inequality. In LinA. C.HarrisD. R. (Eds.), The colors of poverty (pp. 52-75). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
12.
BurgoonE. M.HendersonM. D.MarkmanA. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 501-520.
13.
ChoiI.NisbettR. E.NorenzayanA. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47-63.
14.
CloreG. L.GasperK. (2000). Feeling is believing: Some affective influences on belief. In FrijdaN.MansteadT.BemS. (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts (pp. 10-44). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CloreG. L.HuntsingerJ. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 393-399.
16.
CloreG. L.HuntsingerJ. R. (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1, 39-54.
17.
CloreG. L.SchillerA. J. (in press). New light on the affect-cognition connection. In BarrettL. F.LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
CloreG. L.WyerR. S.Jr.DienesB.GasperK.GohmC.IsbellL. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 27-62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
DienerE.DienerC. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181-185.
22.
Er-rafiyA.BrauerM. (2012). Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discrimination: Theory and application. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 920-935.
23.
FishbachA.LabrooA. A. (2007). Be better or be merry: How mood affects self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 158-173.
24.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York, NY: Academic Press.
25.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.KuschelS. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579-599.
26.
FraleyR. C.VazireS. (2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109019.
27.
FriedmanR.FörsterJ. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 875-893.
28.
FrijdaN. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349-358.
29.
GasperK.CloreG. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34-40.
30.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. A.PriceT. F. (2013). Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 301-307.
31.
HarrisL. T.FiskeS. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17, 847-853.
32.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1-22.
34.
HunsingerM.IsbellL. M.CloreG. L. (2012). Sometimes happy people focus on the trees and sad people focus on the forest: Context dependent effects of mood in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 220-232.
35.
HuntsingerJ. R. (2012). Does positive affect broaden and negative affect narrow attentional scope? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 595-600.
36.
HuntsingerJ. R. (2014). A flexible impact of affective feelings on priming effects: Assimilation and contrast. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 450-462.
37.
HuntsingerJ. R.CloreG. L.Bar-AnanY. (2010). Mood and global-local focus: Priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global-local processing. Emotion, 10, 722-726.
38.
HuntsingerJ. R.IsbellL. M.CloreG. L. (2014). The affective control of thought: Malleable, not fixed. Psychological Review, 121, 600-618.
39.
IsbellL. M. (2004). Not all happy people are lazy or stupid: Evidence of systematic processing in happy moods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 341-349.
40.
IsbellL. M.BurnsK. C.HaarT. (2005). The role of affect on the search for global and specific target information. Social Cognition, 23, 529-552.
41.
IsbellL. M.LairE. C. (2013). Moods, emotions, and evaluations as information. In CarlstonD. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 435-462). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
IsbellL. M.LairE. C.RovenporD. R. (2013). Affect-as-information about processing styles: A cognitive malleability approach. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 93-114.
43.
IsbellL. M.McCabeJ.BurnsK. C.LairE. C. (2013). Who am I? The influence of affect on the working self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1073-1090.
44.
IsbellL. M.RovenporD. R.LairE. C. (2016). The impact of negative emotions on self-concept abstraction depends on accessible information processing styles. Manuscript submitted for publication.
45.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206-1217.
46.
KimchiR. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
47.
KooM.CloreG. L.KimJ.ChoiI. (2012). Affective facilitation and inhibition of cultural influences on reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 680-689.
48.
LevyS. R.FreitasA. L.SaloveyP. (2002). Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with and helping, others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1224-1238.
49.
LinvilleP. W.FischerG. W.SaloveyP. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
50.
MackieD. M.WorthL. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
51.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
52.
MartinL. L.WardD. W.AcheeJ. W.WyerR. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317-326.
53.
MesquitaB.BarrettL. F.SmithE. R. (2010). The mind in context. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
MessickD. M.MackieD. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
55.
MikulincerM.KedemP.PazD. (1990). Anxiety and categorization: 1. The structure and boundaries of mental categories. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 805-814.
56.
MurrayN.SujanH.HirtE. R.SujanM. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411-425.
57.
NavonD. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
58.
ParkB.JuddC. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
59.
PastötterB.GleixnerS.NeuhauserT.BäumlK. H. T. (2013). To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame. Cognition, 126, 373-377.
60.
PerrottD. A.BodenhausenG. V. (2002). The way you make me feel: Integral affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 84-86.
61.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741.
62.
QuellerS.MackieD. M.StroessnerS. J. (1996). Ameliorating some negative effects of positive mood: Encouraging happy people to perceive intragroup variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 361-386.
63.
SchillerA. J.CloreG. L. (2014). The impact of affect depends on its object. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
64.
SchwarzN. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
65.
SchwarzN.BlessH.BohnerG. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161-199). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
67.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385-407). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
68.
SimonH. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29-39.
69.
SkitkaL. J. (1999). Ideological and attributional boundaries on public compassion: Reactions to individuals and communities affected by a natural disaster. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 793-808.
70.
StroessnerS. J.MackieD. M.MichaelsenV. (2005). Positive mood and the perception of variability within and between groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 5-25.
71.
WangL.MottronL.PengD.BerthiaumeC.DawsonM. (2007). Local bias and local-to-global interference without global deficit: A robust finding in autism under various conditions of attention, exposure time, and visual angle. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 550-574.
72.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048.
73.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E.SmithS. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5-15.
74.
WeinerB.OsborneD.RudolphU. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the give and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 199-213.
75.
WoltinK.-A.CorneilleC.YzerbytV. (2012). Improving communicative understanding: The benefits of global processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1179-1182.
76.
WyerR. S.Jr.CloreG. L.IsbellL. M. (1999). Affect and information processing. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 1-77). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
77.
YovelI.RevelleW.MinekaS. (2005). Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention. Psychological Science, 16, 123-129.
78.
ZieglerR. (2014). Mood and processing effort: The mood-congruent expectancies approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 287-355.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
