The current article examines if, and under which conditions, there exists a positive relationship between working with friends and group performance. To do so, using data from 1,016 groups obtained from 26 studies, we meta-analyzed comparisons of the performance of friendship groups versus acquaintance groups. Results show that friendship has a significant positive effect on group task performance (Cohen’s d = 0.31). Furthermore, this relationship was moderated by group size (i.e., the positive effect of friendship on performance increased with group size) and task focus (i.e., friendship groups performed better than acquaintance groups on tasks requiring a high quantity of output, whereas there was no performance benefit on tasks requiring a single or high-quality output). These results help to reconcile mixed findings and illustrate when friendship groups are more likely to perform better than acquaintance groups.
*AnderssonJ. (2001). Net effect of memory collaboration: How is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 367-375.
2.
*AnderssonJ.RönnbergJ. (1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199-211.
3.
*AnderssonJ.RönnbergJ. (1996). Collaboration and memory: Effects of dyadic retrieval on different memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 171-181.
4.
*AnderssonJ.RönnbergJ. (1997). Cued memory collaboration: Effects of friendship and type of retrieval cue. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 273-287.
5.
AronE. N.AronA. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345-368.
6.
AschS. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
7.
AustinW. (1980). Friendship and fairness effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402-408.
8.
*AzmitiaM.MontgomeryR. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202-221.
9.
BaldwinT. T.BedellM. D.JohnsonJ. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397.
10.
BanduraA.LockeE. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.
11.
BaronR. S.KerrN. L. (2003). Group process, group decision, group action. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
12.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
13.
BeggC. B.MazumdarM. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088-1101.
14.
BermanE. M.WestJ. P.RichterM. N.Jr. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62, 217-230.
15.
BerndtT. J.KeefeK. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312-1329.
16.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Interpersonal attraction and close relationships. In FiskeS.GilbertD.LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., 193-281). New York, NY: Random House.
17.
BirchL. L.BillmanJ. (1986). Preschool children’s food sharing with friends and acquaintances. Child Development, 57, 387-395.
18.
BondR. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 331-354.
19.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Publication bias. In Introduction to meta-analysis (pp. 277-292). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
*BosN. D.BuyukturA.OlsonJ. S.OlsonG. M.VoidaA. (2010, November). Shared identity helps partially distributed teams, but distance still matters. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 89-96). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
22.
BrayR. M.KerrN. L.AtkinR. S. (1978). Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1224-1240.
23.
*BrennanA. A.EnnsJ. T. (2015). What’s in a friendship? Partner visibility supports cognitive collaboration between friends. PLoS ONE, 10, e0143469.
24.
ByrneD. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 11). New York, NY: Academic Press.
25.
CarrP. B.WaltonG. M. (2014). Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 169-184.
26.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
27.
CohenJ. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220.
28.
CohenJ. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.JudgeT. A.ShawJ. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110-127.
30.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
31.
De JongB. A.DirksK. T.GillespieN. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1134-1150.
32.
DeutschM. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
DunnJ. (2004). Children’s friendships: The beginning of intimacy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and Fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
35.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.
36.
EllemersN.De GilderD.HaslamS. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
37.
EvansC. R.DionK. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance a meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
38.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2016). Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 68-80.
39.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC. (2013). Friends shrink foes: The presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent. Psychological Science, 24, 797-802.
40.
ForsythD. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
GalbraithJ. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
42.
GreenbergM. T.MarvinR. S. (1982). Reactions of preschool children to an adult stranger: A behavioral systems approach. Child Development, 53, 481-490.
43.
*GruenfeldD. H.MannixE. A.WilliamsK. Y.NealeM. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1-15.
44.
HackmanJ. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
45.
HackmanJ. R.VidmarN. (1970). Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry, 33(1), 37-54.
46.
HackmanJ. R.WagemanR. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 309-342.
47.
HanhamJ.McCormickJ. M. (2008). Relationships between self-processes and group processes with friends and acquaintances. Issues in Educational Research, 18, 118-137.
48.
*HarrisonD. A.MohammedS.McGrathJ. E.FloreyA. T.VanderstoepS. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633-669.
49.
HartupW. W.StevensN. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355-370.
50.
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6, 107-128.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558.
53.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560.
54.
HoggM. A.HainsS. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 323-341.
55.
*HopeL.OstJ.GabbertF.HealeyS.LentonE. (2008). “With a little help from my friends . . .”: The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica, 127, 476-484.
56.
HuffcuttA. I.ArthurW. (1995). Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 327-334.
57.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM.JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
58.
InghamA. G.LevingerG.GravesJ.PeckhamV. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
59.
JehnK. A.MannixE. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
60.
*JehnK. A.ShahP. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
61.
Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D.SimonL. S.JudgeT. A. (2016). A head start or a step behind? Understanding how dispositional and motivational resources influence emotional exhaustion. Journal of Management, 42, 561-581.
62.
KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
63.
*KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 156-168.
64.
KellyJ. R.McGrathJ. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-407.
65.
KerrN. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
66.
*KerrN. L.SeokD. H. (2011). “. . . with a little help from my friends”: Friendship, effort norms, and group motivation gain. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 205-218.
67.
KerrN. L.TindaleR. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655.
68.
KleinH. J.MulveyP. W. (1995). Two investigations of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 44-53.
69.
KongD. T.DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2014). Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1235-1255.
70.
KrackhardtD. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In NohriaN.EcclesR. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
71.
*KrylowM. R. (2008). One step beyond being “familiar”: Comparing the engagement of friends and strangers in a hidden profile study (Master’s thesis). The University of Delaware, Newark.
72.
*KutnickP.KingtonA. (2005). Children’s friendships and learning in school: Cognitive enhancement through social interaction?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 521-538.
73.
LaddG. W. (1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment?Child Development, 61, 1081-1100.
74.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
75.
LarsonJ. R.Jr. (2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
76.
LatanéB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
77.
LaughlinP. R. (2011). Group problem solving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
LawrenceP.LorschJ. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
79.
LinY. H. W.RusbultC. E. (1995). Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 7-26.
80.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
81.
LountR. B.Jr.WilkS. L. (2014). Working harder or hardly working? Posting performance eliminates social loafing and promotes social laboring in workgroups. Management Science, 60, 1098-1106.
82.
LoydD. L.WangC. S.PhillipsK. W.LountR. B.Jr. (2013). Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24, 757-772.
83.
LuL.YuanY. C.McLeodP. L. (2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 54-75.
84.
MendelsonM. J.KayA. C. (2003). Positive feelings in friendship: Does imbalance in the relationship matter?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 101-116.
85.
Mesmer-MagnusJ. R.DeChurchL. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535-546.
86.
*MiellD.MacDonaldR. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9, 348-369.
87.
MorelandR. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups?Small Group Research, 41, 251-267.
88.
MorrisonE. W. (2002). Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1149-1160.
89.
MullenB. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 295-322.
90.
NemethC. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
91.
*NewcombA. F.BradyJ. E. (1982). Mutuality in boys’ friendship relations. Child Development, 53, 392-395.
92.
*NiblerR.HarrisK. L. (2003). The effects of culture and cohesiveness on intragroup conflict and effectiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 613-631.
93.
NijstadB. A. (2009). Group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
94.
PatakiS. P.ShapiroC.ClarkM. S. (1994). Children’s acquisition of appropriate norms for friendships and acquaintances. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 427-442.
95.
*PekerM.TekcanA. İ. (2009). The role of familiarity among group members in collaborative inhibition and social contagion. Social Psychology, 40, 111-118.
96.
Perry-SmithJ. E. (2014). Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: An experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 831-846.
97.
PetersonR. S.BehfarK. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 102-112.
98.
PilialohaB. R.BrewerM. B. (2006). Motivated entitativity: Applying balance theory to group perception. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 235-247.
99.
ProffittD. R.StefanucciJ.BantonT.EpsteinW. (2003). The role of effort in perceived distance. Psychological Science, 14, 106-112.
100.
RaudenbushS. W. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 295-315). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
RiordanC. M.GriffethR. W. (1995). The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 141-154.
103.
RossH. S.CheyneJ. A.LollisS. P. (1988). Defining and studying reciprocity in young children. In DuckS.HaleD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 143-160). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
104.
SchnallS.HarberK. D.StefanucciJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1246-1255.
105.
*ShahP. P.JehnK. A. (1993). Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 149-165.
106.
SharabanyR.Hertz-LazarowitzR. (1981). Do friends share and communicate more than non-friends?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 45-59.
107.
SimonsT. L.PetersonR. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
108.
SteinerI. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
109.
StroebeW. (2016). Are most published social psychological findings false?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 134-144.
110.
*SwensonL. M.StroughJ. (2008). Adolescents’ collaboration in the classroom: Do peer relationships or gender matter?Psychology in the Schools, 45, 715-728.
111.
TesserA.MillarM.MooreJ. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 49-61.
112.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
113.
ThomasK. A.DeScioliP.HaqueO. S.PinkerS. (2014). The psychology of coordination and common knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 657-676.
114.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administration. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
115.
*ThompsonN. S. (2016). “The Friend Zone”—Friendship moderates the impact of a web-based group dynamics application on group cohesion: A randomized trail (Master’s thesis). Kansas State University, Manhattan.
116.
TiddS. T.McIntyreH. H.FriedmanR. A. (2004). The importance of role ambiguity and trust in conflict perception: Unpacking the task conflict to relationship conflict linkage. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 364-380.
117.
Van de VenA. H.FerryD. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
118.
*Van DickR.StellmacherJ.WagnerU.LemmerG.TissingtonP. A. (2009). Group membership salience and task performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 609-626.
119.
VeveaJ. L.CoburnK. M. (2015). Maximum-likelihood methods for meta-analysis: A tutorial using R. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 329-347.
120.
*VoidaA.BosN.OlsonJ.OlsonG.DunningL. (2012, May). Cross-cutting faultlines of location and shared identity in the intergroup cooperation of partially distributed groups. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3101-3110). Association for Computing Machinery.
121.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Wiley.
122.
WegnerD. M.ErberR.RaymondP. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
123.
WheelanS. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40, 247-262.
124.
WilliamsK. D. (2010). Dyads can be groups (and often are). Small Group Research, 41, 268-274.
125.
WinsteadB. A.DerlegaV. J.MontgomeryM. J.PilkingtonC. (1995). The quality of friendships at work and job satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 199-215.
126.
YangJ.MossholderK. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 589-605.
127.
ZaccaroS. J.LoweC. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
128.
ZaccaroS. J.McCoyM. C. (2006). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837-851.
