Despite the centrality of both attitude accessibility and attitude basis to the last 30 years of theoretical and empirical work concerning attitudes, little work has systematically investigated their relation. The research that does exist provides conflicting results and is not at all conclusive given the methodology that has been used. The current research uses recent advances in statistical modeling and attitude measurement to provide the most systematic examination of the relation between attitude accessibility and basis to date. Specifically, we use mixed-effects modeling which accounts for variation across individuals and attitude objects in conjunction with the Evaluative Lexicon (EL)—a linguistic approach that allows for the simultaneous measurement of an attitude’s valence, extremity, and emotionality. We demonstrate across four studies, over 10,000 attitudes, and nearly 50 attitude objects that attitudes based on emotion tend to be more accessible in memory, particularly if the attitude is positive.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
2.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
3.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
4.
CraskeM. G.HermansD.VansteenwegenD. (2006). Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
DenrellJ. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112, 951-978. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.951
6.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129.
7.
FazioR. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In HendrickC.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
8.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
FazioR. H. (2007). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
10.
FazioR. H.EiserJ. R.ShookN. J. (2004). Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 293-311. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.293
11.
FazioR. H.PietriE. S.RocklageM. D.ShookN. J. (2015). Positive versus negative valence: Asymmetries in attitude formation and generalization as fundamental individual differences. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 51, pp. 97-146). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260114000033
12.
FazioR. H.PowellM. C.WilliamsC. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 280-288. doi:10.1086/209214
13.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
14.
FazioR. H.WilliamsC. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude–perception and attitude–behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505
15.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2011). Beyond evaluative conditioning! Evidence for transfer of non-evaluative attributes. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 479-486. doi:10.1177/1948550611398413
16.
GawronskiB.MitchellD. G. V. (2014). Simultaneous conditioning of valence and arousal. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 577-595. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.843506
17.
Giner-SorollaR. (2001). Affective attitudes are not always faster: The moderating role of extremity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 666-677.
18.
HaddockG.RothmanA. J.ReberR.SchwarzN. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771-782. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007001
19.
HaddockG.ZannaM. P.EssesV. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105-1118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1105
20.
HerrP. M.PageC. M. (2004). Asymmetric association of liking and disliking judgments: So what’s not to like?Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 588-601. doi:10.1086/380291
21.
HoustonD. A.FazioR. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51-66. doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.1.51
22.
JonesC. R.FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933-948.
23.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54-69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
24.
KimJ.AllenC. T.KardesF. R. (1996). An investigation of the mediational mechanisms underlying attitudinal conditioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 318-328.
25.
KrosnickJ. A.BoningerD. S.ChuangY. C.BerentM. K.CarnotC. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151.
26.
LavineH.ThomsenC. J.ZannaM. P.BorgidaE. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398-421.
27.
NezlekJ. B. (2011). Multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
OlsonM. A.KendrickR. V.FazioR. H. (2009). Implicit learning of evaluative vs. non-evaluative covariations: The role of dimension accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 398-403. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.007
29.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184-188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
30.
PettyR. E.FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752-772). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
PhamM. T. (2007). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 11, 155-178. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155
33.
ReflingE. J.CalnanC. M.FabrigarL. R.MacDonaldT. K.JohnsonV. C.SmithS. M. (2013). To partition or not to partition evaluative judgments: Comparing measures of structural ambivalence. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 387-394. doi:10.1177/1948550612460060
34.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2014). Individual differences in valence weighting: When, how, and why they matter. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 144-157. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.013
35.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2015). The Evaluative Lexicon: Adjective use as a means of assessing and distinguishing attitude valence, extremity, and emotionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 214-227. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.005
36.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2016). On the dominance of attitude emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 259-270. doi:10.1177/0146167215623273
37.
RocklageM. D.RuckerD. D.NordgrenL. F. (in press). The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language. Behavior Research Methods.
38.
Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.FazioR. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198-211.
39.
SchwarzN. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
41.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
42.
SmallmanR.BeckerB.RoeseN. J. (2014). Preferences for expressing preferences: People prefer finer evaluative distinctions for liked than disliked objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 25-31. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.004
43.
StangorC.SullivanL. A.FordT. E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359-380. doi:10.1521/soco.1991.9.4.359
44.
UnkelbachC.FiedlerK.BayerM.StegmüllerM.DannerD. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36-49. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
45.
van den BergH.MansteadA. S. R.van der PligtJ.WigboldusD. H. J. (2006). The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 373-379. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.009
46.
VisserP. S.BizerG. Y.KrosnickJ. A. (2006). Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 1-61). Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S006526010638001X.
47.
YoungA. I.FazioR. H. (2013). Attitude accessibility as a determinant of object construal and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 404-418. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.009
48.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
49.
ZannaM. P.RempelJ. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In Bar-TalD.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
