Research conducted in Western cultures indicates that perspective-taking is an effective social strategy for reducing stereotyping. The current article explores whether and why the effects of perspective-taking on stereotyping differ across cultures. Studies 1 and 2 established that perspective-taking reduces stereotyping in Western but not in East Asian cultures. Using a socioecological framework, Studies 2 and 3 found that relational mobility, that is, the extent to which individuals’ social environments provide them opportunities to choose new relationships and terminate old ones, explained our effect: Perspective-taking was negatively associated with stereotyping in relationally mobile (Western) but not in relationally stable (East Asian) environments. Finally, Study 4 examined the proximal psychological mechanism underlying the socioecological effect: Individuals in relationally mobile environments are more motivated to develop new relationships than those in relationally stable environments. Subsequently, when this motivation is high, perspective-taking increases self-target group overlap, which then decreases stereotyping.
AbersonC. L.HaagS. C. (2007). Contact, perspective taking, and anxiety as predictors of stereotype endorsement, explicit attitudes, and implicit attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 179-201. doi:10.1177/1368430207074726
2.
AdamsG. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 948-968. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.948
3.
AdamsG.PlautV. C. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North American and West African worlds. Personal Relationships, 10, 333-347. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00053
4.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
5.
BahnsA. J.PickettK. M.CrandallC. S. (2011). Social ecology of similarity: Big schools, small schools and social relationships. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 119-131. doi:10.1177/1368430211410751
6.
BatsonC. D.ChangJ.OrrR.RowlandJ. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656-1666. doi:10.1177/014616702237647
7.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
8.
BatsonC. D.PolycarpouM. P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH. J.MitchenerE. C.BednarL. L.. . . HighbergerL. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105-118.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
10.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
11.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
12.
ChenJ.ChiuC.-y.ChanS. F. (2009). The cultural effects of job mobility and the belief in a fixed world: Evidence from performance forecast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 851-865. doi:10.1037/a0015950
13.
CohenD. (2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 451-471. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.451
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
16.
DavisM. H.ConklinL.SmithA.LuceC. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713-726.
17.
DeS.GelfandM. J.NauD.RoosP. (2015). The inevitability of ethnocentrism revisited: Ethnocentrism diminishes as mobility increases. Scientific Reports, 5, Article 17963. doi:10.1038/srep17963
18.
de Jong-GierveldJ. (1987). Developing and testing a model of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 119-128.
19.
DevineP. G.ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139-1150. doi:10.1177/01461672952111002
20.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. San Diego: Academic Press.
21.
DovidioJ. F.Ten VergertM.StewartT. L.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonJ. D.EssesV. M.. . . PearsonA. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537-1549. doi:10.1177/0146167204271177
22.
DroletA.LarrickR.MorrisM. W. (1998). Thinking of others: How perspective taking changes negotiators’ aspirations and fairness perceptions as a function of negotiator relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 23-31. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2001_3
23.
EpleyN.CarusoE. M.BazermanM. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 872-889. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.872
24.
FalkC. F.HeineS. J.YukiM.TakemuraK. (2009). Why do westerners self-enhance more than East Asians. European Journal of Personality, 23, 183-203. doi:10.1002/per.715
25.
GableS. L.ImpettE. A. (2012). Approach and avoidance motives and close relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 95-108. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00405.x
26.
GalinskyA. D.KuG. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 594-604. doi:10.1177/0146167203262802
27.
GalinskyA. D.KuG.WangC. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 109-124. doi:10.1177/1368430205051060
28.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
29.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2007). Further ironies of suppression: Stereotype and counterstereotype accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 833-841. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.09.001
30.
GalinskyA. D.ToddA. R.HomanA. C.PhillipsK. W.ApfelbaumE. P.SasakiS. J.. . . MadduxW. W. (2015). Maximizing the gains and minimizing the pains of diversity: A policy perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 742-748. doi:10.1177/1745691615598513
31.
GalinskyA. D.WangC. S.KuG. (2008). Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 404-419. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.404
32.
GilinD.MadduxW. W.CarpenterJ.GalinskyA. D. (2013). When to use your head and when to use your heart: The differential value of perspective-taking versus empathy in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0146167212465320
33.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
KuG.WangC. S.GalinskyA. D. (2010). Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 792-798. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.001
35.
KuG.WangC. S.GalinskyA. D. (2015). The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.003
36.
LeeH. (1990). To kill a mockingbird. New York, NY: HarperCollins. (Original work published 1960)
37.
LiL. M. W.AdamsG.KurtişT.HamamuraT. (2015). Beware of friends: The cultural psychology of relational mobility and cautious intimacy. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 124-133. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12091
38.
LiL. M. W.HamamuraT.AdamsG. (2015). Relational mobility increases social (but not other) risk propensity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 481-488. doi:10.1002/bdm.1894
39.
MacyM. W.SatoY. (2002). Trust, cooperation, and market formation in the US and Japan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 7214-7220. doi:10.1073/pnas.082097399
40.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In StraussJ.GoethalsG. R. (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18-48). New York, NY: Springer.
41.
MaslowA. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
42.
MenonT.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.-y.HongY.-y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.
43.
MorrisM. W.MenonT.AmesD. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 169-182.
MyersM. W.LaurentS. M.HodgesS. D. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 224-234. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9377-y
46.
OishiS. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 5-21. doi:10.1177/1745691609356781
47.
OishiS.GrahamJ. (2010). Social ecology lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 356-377. doi:10.1177/1745691610374588
48.
OishiS.SchugJ.YukiM.AxtJ. (2015). The psychology of residential and relational mobilities. In GelfandM. J.ChiuC.HongY. (Eds.) Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 221-272). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
OlsonM. A.ZabelK. L. (2009). Measures of prejudice. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 367-386). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
50.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London, England: Kegan, Paul, Trench & Trubner.
51.
PierceJ. R.KilduffG. J.GalinskyA. D.SivanathanN. (2013). From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science, 24, 1986-1994. doi:10.1177/0956797613482144
52.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
53.
SchugJ.YukiM.HorikawaH.TakemuraK. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95-103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01277.x
54.
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. (2010). Relational mobility explains between-and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21, 1471-1478. doi:10.1177/0956797610382786
55.
ShihM.WangE.BucherA. T.StotzerR. (2009). Perspective taking: Reducing prejudice towards general outgroups and specific individuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 565-577. doi:10.1177/1368430209337463
56.
SingelisT. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014
57.
SkorinkoJ. L.SinclairS.ConklinL. (2012). Perspective taking shapes the impact of significant-other representations. Self and Identity, 11, 170-184. doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.517986
58.
SmithA. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.
59.
SmithE. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297-316). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60.
SpencerH. (1870). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). London, England: Williams.
61.
TakemuraK.SuzukiS. (2017). Self-expression and relationship formation in high relational mobility environments: A study of dual users of American and Japanese social networking sites. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 251-255. doi:10.1002/ijop.12208
62.
TarrantM.CalitriR.WestonD. (2012). Social identification structures the effects of perspective taking. Psychological Science, 23, 973-978. doi:10.1177/0956797612441221
63.
ToddA. R.BodenhausenG. V.GalinskyA. D. (2012). Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 738-745. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.011
64.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30, 94-108. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.94
65.
TroppL. R.WrightS. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.
66.
VanVoorhisC. R. W.MorganB. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43-50. doi:10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
67.
WangC. S.KuG.TaiK.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Stupid doctors and smart construction workers: Perspective-taking reduces stereotyping of both negative and positive targets. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 430-436. doi:10.1177/1948550613504968
68.
WangC. S.LeungA. K.-y. (2010). The cultural dynamics of rewarding honesty and punishing deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1529-1542. doi:10.1177/0146167210385921
69.
WangC. S.LeungA. K.-y.SeeY. H. M.GaoX. Y. (2011). The effects of culture and friendship on rewarding honesty and punishing deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1295-1299. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.011
70.
WangC. S.TaiK.KuG.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Perspective-taking increases willingness to engage in intergroup contact. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85681. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085681
71.
WeyantJ. M. (2007). Perspective taking as a means of reducing negative stereotyping of individuals who speak English as a second language. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 703-716. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00181.x
72.
WhitsonJ.WangC. S.KimJ.CaoJ.ScrimpshireA. (2014). Responses to normative and norm-violating behavior: Culture, job mobility, and social inclusion and exclusion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 24-35. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.08.001
73.
WuS.KeysarB. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18, 600-606.
74.
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19, 579-584. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x
75.
YamagishiT.JinN.MillerA. S. (1998). In-group bias and culture of collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 315-328. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00020
76.
YukiM.SchugJ. (2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In GillathO.AdamsG.KunkelA. (Eds.) Relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 137-151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
77.
YukiM.SchugJ.HorikawaH.TakemuraK.SatoK.YokotaK.KamayaK. (2007). Development of a scale to measure perceptions of relational mobility in society. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University.
78.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.Jr.ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206. doi:10.1086/651257
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
