The concept of personality coherence refers to the extent of psychological unity and wholeness embodied within each individual. In the present research, we examined the extent to which the narrative, functional, and organismic conceptualizations of personality coherence interrelate, as well as their associations with psychological abilities and personal adjustment. College students (N = 391) narrated accounts of three personal memories; listed five personal strivings that they subsequently compared and evaluated; completed performance measures of their intelligence, wisdom, and creativity; and rated their hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Individuals who coherently organized their autobiographical memories were protected against feeling pressured or compelled in their personal strivings and against being steered toward need-detracting futures. Narrative indicators of coherence were otherwise independent of the functional and organismic indicators, although all indicators of personality coherence correlated with personal adjustment. Wisdom and creativity predicted narrative coherence, which partially mediated the associations they demonstrated with eudaimonic well-being.
AdlerJ. M.ChinE. D.KolisettyA. P.OltmannsT. F. (2012). The distinguishing characteristics of narrative identity in adults with features of borderline personality disorder: An empirical investigation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 498-512. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.498
2.
AdlerJ. M.DunlopW. L.FivushR.LilgendahlJ. P.Lodi-SmithJ.McAdamsD. P.. . . SyedM. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 519-527. doi:10.1177/1948550617698202
3.
AdlerJ. M.HarmelingL. H.Walder-BiesanzI. (2013). Narrative meaning-making is associated with sudden gains in clients’ mental health under routine clinical conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 839-845. doi:10.1037/a0033774
4.
AdlerJ. M.Lodi-SmithJ.PhilippeF. L.HouleI. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 142-175. doi:10.1177/1088868315585068
5.
AdlerJ. M.SkalinaL. M.McAdamsD. P. (2008). The narrative reconstruction of psychotherapy and psychological health. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 719-734. doi:10.1080/10503300802326020
6.
AdlerJ. M.WagnerJ. W.McAdamsD. P. (2007). Personality and the coherence of psychotherapy narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1179-1198. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.006
7.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
8.
AllportG. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9.
BaergerD. B.McAdamsD. P. (1999). Life story coherence and its relation to psychological well-being. Narrative Inquiry, 9, 69-96. doi:10.1075/ni.9.1.05bae
10.
BaltesP. B.SmithJ. (1990). The psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 87-120). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122-136. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
12.
BiesanzJ. C.WestS. G. (2000). Personality coherence: Moderating self-other profile agreement and profile consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 425-437. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.425
13.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
14.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CervoneD.ShodaY. (1999). Social-cognitive theories and the coherence of personality. In CervoneD.ShodaY. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 3-33). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
CondonD. M.RevelleW. (2014). The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52-64. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004
17.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122. doi:10.1037/a0021212
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
19.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
20.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
21.
EmmonsR. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058-1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058
22.
EmmonsR. A.KingL. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040-1048. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1040
23.
FournierM. A. (in press). Integrative processes and personality coherence across levels of functioning. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
24.
FournierM. A.Di DomenicoS. I. (2016). Coherence of personality. In Zeigler-HillV.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-11). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1122-1
25.
FournierM. A.Di DomenicoS. I.WeststrateN. M.QuitasolM. N.DongM. (2015). Toward a unified science of personality coherence. Canadian Psychology, 56, 253-262. doi: 10.1037/cap0000022
26.
GagnéM. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223. doi:10.1023/A:1025007614869
27.
GergenK. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in modern life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
GrayJ. S.OzerD. J.RosenthalR. (2017). Goal conflict and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 27-37. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.003
29.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30.
HabermasT.BluckS. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748-769. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.748
31.
HemphillJ. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78-79. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78
32.
KasserT.RyanR. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410-422. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.410
33.
KasserT.RyanR. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280-287. doi:10.1177/0146167296223006
34.
KöberC.SchmiedekF.HabermasT. (2015). Characterizing lifespan development of three aspects of coherence in life narratives: A cohort-sequential study. Developmental Psychology, 51, 260-275. doi:10.1037/a0038668
35.
McAdamsD. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100-122. doi:10.1037//I089-2680.5.2.100
36.
McAdamsD. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19, 109-125. doi:10.1080/10720530500508720
McAdamsD. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8, 272-295. doi:10.1177/1745691612464657
39.
McCraeR. E. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
40.
McNeishD. (2017). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/met0000144
41.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
42.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.R-project.org/
43.
ReeseE.HadenC. A.Baker-WardL.BauerP.FivushR.OrnsteinP. A. (2011). Coherence of personal narratives across the lifespan: A multidimensional model and coding method. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 424-462. doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.587854
44.
RevelleW. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
45.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
47.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlling goals on effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546-557. doi:10.1177/0146167298245010
50.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482-497. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
51.
SheldonK. M.EmmonsR. (1995). Comparing differentiation and integration within personal goal systems. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 39-46.
52.
SheldonK. M.KasserT. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531-543. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.3.531
53.
SmithJ.BaltesP. B. (1990). Wisdom-related knowledge: Age/cohort differences in response to life-planning problems. Developmental Psychology, 26, 494-505. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.494
54.
StaudingerU. M.LopezD. F.BaltesP. B. (1997). The psychometric location of wisdom-related performance: Intelligence, personality, and more?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1200-1214. doi:10.1177/01461672972311007
55.
StaudingerU. M.MacielA. G.SmithJ.BaltesP. B. (1998). What predicts wisdom-related performance? A first look at personality, intelligence, and facilitative experiential contexts. European Journal of Personality, 12, 1-17. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199801/02)12:1<1:: AID-PER285>3.0.CO;2-9
56.
SternbergR. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SyedM.NelsonS. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 375-387. doi:10.1177/2167696815587648
58.
WatersT. E. A.FivushR. (2015). Relations between narrative coherence, identity, and psychological well-being in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality, 83, 441-451. doi:10.1111/jopy.12120
59.
WatersT. E. A.ShallcrossJ. F.FivushR. (2013). The many facets of meaning making: Comparing multiple measures of meaning making and their relations to psychological distress. Memory, 21, 111-124. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.705300
60.
WeststrateN. M.FerrariM.FournierM. A.McLeanK. C. (2018). “It was the best worst day of my life”: Narrative content, structure, and process in wisdom-fostering life event memories. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
