This research finds evidence for reliable individual differences in people’s perceived attitude stability that predict the actual stability of their attitudes over time. Study 1 examines the reliability and factor structure of an 11-item Personal Attitude Stability Scale (PASS). Study 2 establishes test–retest reliability for the PASS over a 5-week period. Studies 3a and 3b demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity of the PASS in relation to relevant existing individual differences. Studies 4 and 5 show that the PASS predicts attitude stability following a delay period across several distinct topics. Across multiple attitude objects, for people with high (vs. low) scores on the PASS, Time 1 attitudes were more predictive of their Time 2 attitudes, indicative of greater attitudinal consistency over time. The final study also demonstrates that the PASS predicts attitude stability above and beyond other related scales.
AbelsonR. P. (1968). Psychological implication. In AbelsonR. P.AronsonE.McGuireW. J.NewcombT. M.RosenbergM. J.TannenbaumP. H. (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 112–139). Rand McNally.
2.
AkhtarO.WheelerS. C. (2016). Belief in the immutability of attitudes both increases and decreases advocacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 475–492.
3.
AlbarracínD.MitchellA. L. (2004). The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1565–1584.
4.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
5.
BardenJ.PettyR. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 489–509.
6.
BassiliJ. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 637–653.
7.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
8.
BemD. J.AllenA. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520.
9.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
10.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
11.
BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2019). The impact of individual differences on attitudes and attitude change. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB.T. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 520–556). Routledge.
12.
BriñolP.RuckerD. D.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. In KnowlesE. S.LinnJ. A. (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 83–104). Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.
14.
ChaikenS.LibermanA.EaglyA. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (Eds.) Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
ChiuC. Y.HongY. Y.DweckC. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30.
16.
CialdiniR. B. (2004). The science of persuasion. Scientific American Mind, 14(1), 70–77.
17.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R.NewsomJ. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 318–328.
18.
CunninghamW. A.PreacherK. J.BanajiM. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12(2), 163–170.
19.
De CastellaK.ByrneD. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245–267.
20.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Taylor & Francis.
21.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
FestingerL.CarlsmithJ. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210.
23.
FromkinH. L.SnyderC. R. (1980). The search for uniqueness and valuation of scarcity. In GergenK. J.GreenbergM. S.WillisR. H. (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 57–75). Springer.
24.
GlasmanL. R.AlbarracínD. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822.
25.
GellerG.TamborE. S.ChaseG. A.HoltzmanN. A. (1993). Measuring physicians’ tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing. Medical Care, 989–1001.
26.
GoethalsG. R.ReckmanR. F. (1973). The perception of consistency in attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(6), 491–501.
27.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
28.
GoughH. G. (1957). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press.
29.
GoughH. G.SanfordR. N. (1952). Rigidity as a psychological variable [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California, Berkeley.
30.
HinkleD. E.WiersmaW.JursS. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
31.
HirshJ. B.KangS. K.BodenhausenG. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581.
32.
HovlandC. I.JanisI. L.KelleyH. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
33.
JarvisW. B. G. (2017). MediaLab (Version 200x. xx) [Computer Software]. Empirisoft Corporation.
34.
JarvisW. B. G.PettyR. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172–194.
35.
KapteinM.MarkopoulosP.de RuyterB.AartsE. (2009, August). Can you be persuaded? Individual differences in susceptibility to persuasion. In IFIP conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 115–118). Springer.
36.
KrosnickJ. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(3), 240–255.
37.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2016). Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 56–68.
38.
McGuireW. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. In GreenwaldA.BrockT.OstromT. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (p. 196). Academic Press.
39.
NeelR.ShapiroJ. R. (2012). Is racial bias malleable? Whites’ lay theories of racial bias predict divergent strategies for interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 101–120.
40.
NeubergS. L.NewsomJ. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113–131.
41.
OlesonK. C.PoehlmannK. M.YostJ. H.LynchM. E.ArkinR. M. (2000). Subjective overachievement: Individual differences in self-doubt and concern with performance. Journal of Personality, 68(3), 491–524.
42.
OregS. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680–693.
43.
OstromT. M.UpshawH. S. (1968). Psychological perspective and attitude change. In GreenwaldA. G.BrockT. C.OstromT. M. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 217–242). Academic Press.
44.
PaciniR.EpsteinS. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972–987.
45.
PetrocelliJ. V.ClarksonJ. J.TormalaZ. L.HendrixK. S. (2010). Perceiving stability as a means to attitude certainty: The role of implicit theories of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 874–883.
46.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (Eds.), Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). Springer.
47.
PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
PrislinR. (1996). Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(3), 447–477.
49.
RokeachM. (1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 51, 194–204.
50.
RokeachM. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. Basic Books.
RossM. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96(2), 341–357.
53.
RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2004). When resistance is futile: Consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 219–235.
54.
SantosD.BriñolP.PettyR. E.GandarillasB.MateosR. (2019). Trait aggressiveness predicting aggressive behavior: The moderating role of meta-cognitive certainty. Aggressive Behavior, 45(3), 255–264.
55.
SaucierD. A.WebsterR. J. (2010). Social vigilantism: Measuring individual differences in belief superiority and resistance to persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 19–32.
56.
SchaubroeckJ.GansterD. C.KemmererB. (1996). Does trait affect promote job attitude stability?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(2), 191–196.
57.
Shoots-ReinhardB. L.PettyR. E.DeMarreeK. G.RuckerD. D. (2015). Personality certainty and politics: Increasing the predictive utility of individual-difference inventories. Political Psychology, 36(4), 415–430.
58.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.
59.
SnyderM. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 85–128). Elsevier.
60.
SnyderM.DeBonoK. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 586–597.
61.
ThompsonM. M.NaccaratoM. E.ParkerK. E. (1989, June). Assessing cognitive need: The development of the personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity scales [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Halifax, NS, Canada.
62.
TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2001). On-line versus memory-based processing: The role of “need to evaluate” in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1599–1612.
63.
TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313.
64.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.
65.
VisserP. S.KrosnickJ. A. (1998). Development of attitude strength over the life cycle: Surge and decline. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1389–1410.
66.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062.
67.
WheelerS. C.PettyR. E.BizerG. Y. (2005). Self-schema matching and attitude change: Situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 787–797.
68.
WicklundR. A.BrehmJ. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
